TY - JOUR
T1 - Spinal cord stimulators
T2 - Typical positioning and postsurgical complications
AU - Zan, Elcin
AU - Kurt, Kubra Neslihan
AU - Yousem, David M.
AU - Christo, Paul J.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - OBJECTIVE. Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is one option for pain control in individuals with chronic lumbosacral radicular or axial lumbar pain. The expected positioning of SCSs based on the location of pain, the types of electrodes (percutaneous vs surgical paddle), and the types of electrode arrays and the potential complications have not been described to date in the radiology literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 5-year retrospective review of the radiology information system at our institution revealed 24 patients with images of 36 SCSs. Those images were reviewed to identify the location and type of electrodes as well as the location of the lead within the spinal canal. Not all implantable pulse generators were within the radiologic field of view. Complications identified by reviewing medical records were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS. Fourteen different types of electrodes were identified. Most were placed in the thoracic spine only, but six thoracolumbar and two cervical spine electrodes were also present. We measured the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal on 26 CT studies of the 24 patients. On 22 of 26 CT studies, the electrodes were placed in the epidural space in the posterior one third of the spinal canal. Complications included misplaced, retained, and broken leads; puncture of the thecal sac; infection; and hematoma. CONCLUSION. Radiologists should be familiar with the different types of electrodes and typical spinal locations of electrodes, leads, and implantable pulse generators. Improper placement of electrodes may lead to ineffective pain relief or to other complications.
AB - OBJECTIVE. Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is one option for pain control in individuals with chronic lumbosacral radicular or axial lumbar pain. The expected positioning of SCSs based on the location of pain, the types of electrodes (percutaneous vs surgical paddle), and the types of electrode arrays and the potential complications have not been described to date in the radiology literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 5-year retrospective review of the radiology information system at our institution revealed 24 patients with images of 36 SCSs. Those images were reviewed to identify the location and type of electrodes as well as the location of the lead within the spinal canal. Not all implantable pulse generators were within the radiologic field of view. Complications identified by reviewing medical records were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS. Fourteen different types of electrodes were identified. Most were placed in the thoracic spine only, but six thoracolumbar and two cervical spine electrodes were also present. We measured the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal on 26 CT studies of the 24 patients. On 22 of 26 CT studies, the electrodes were placed in the epidural space in the posterior one third of the spinal canal. Complications included misplaced, retained, and broken leads; puncture of the thecal sac; infection; and hematoma. CONCLUSION. Radiologists should be familiar with the different types of electrodes and typical spinal locations of electrodes, leads, and implantable pulse generators. Improper placement of electrodes may lead to ineffective pain relief or to other complications.
KW - CT
KW - Ct myelography
KW - Epidural positioning
KW - Postsurgical complication
KW - Spinal cord stimulator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251522845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251522845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.10.4789
DO - 10.2214/AJR.10.4789
M3 - Article
C2 - 21257898
AN - SCOPUS:79251522845
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 196
SP - 437
EP - 445
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 2
ER -