Spinal cord stimulators

Typical positioning and postsurgical complications

Elcin Zan, Kubra Neslihan Kurt, David Mark Yousem, Paul Christo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is one option for pain control in individuals with chronic lumbosacral radicular or axial lumbar pain. The expected positioning of SCSs based on the location of pain, the types of electrodes (percutaneous vs surgical paddle), and the types of electrode arrays and the potential complications have not been described to date in the radiology literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 5-year retrospective review of the radiology information system at our institution revealed 24 patients with images of 36 SCSs. Those images were reviewed to identify the location and type of electrodes as well as the location of the lead within the spinal canal. Not all implantable pulse generators were within the radiologic field of view. Complications identified by reviewing medical records were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS. Fourteen different types of electrodes were identified. Most were placed in the thoracic spine only, but six thoracolumbar and two cervical spine electrodes were also present. We measured the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal on 26 CT studies of the 24 patients. On 22 of 26 CT studies, the electrodes were placed in the epidural space in the posterior one third of the spinal canal. Complications included misplaced, retained, and broken leads; puncture of the thecal sac; infection; and hematoma. CONCLUSION. Radiologists should be familiar with the different types of electrodes and typical spinal locations of electrodes, leads, and implantable pulse generators. Improper placement of electrodes may lead to ineffective pain relief or to other complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)437-445
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume196
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord
Electrodes
Spinal Canal
Pain
Spine
Radiology Information Systems
Epidural Space
Implanted Electrodes
Punctures
Radiology
Hematoma
Medical Records
Thorax
Infection

Keywords

  • CT
  • Ct myelography
  • Epidural positioning
  • Postsurgical complication
  • Spinal cord stimulator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Spinal cord stimulators : Typical positioning and postsurgical complications. / Zan, Elcin; Kurt, Kubra Neslihan; Yousem, David Mark; Christo, Paul.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 196, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 437-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16963fd5828d43abaee25121afc95c46,
title = "Spinal cord stimulators: Typical positioning and postsurgical complications",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is one option for pain control in individuals with chronic lumbosacral radicular or axial lumbar pain. The expected positioning of SCSs based on the location of pain, the types of electrodes (percutaneous vs surgical paddle), and the types of electrode arrays and the potential complications have not been described to date in the radiology literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 5-year retrospective review of the radiology information system at our institution revealed 24 patients with images of 36 SCSs. Those images were reviewed to identify the location and type of electrodes as well as the location of the lead within the spinal canal. Not all implantable pulse generators were within the radiologic field of view. Complications identified by reviewing medical records were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS. Fourteen different types of electrodes were identified. Most were placed in the thoracic spine only, but six thoracolumbar and two cervical spine electrodes were also present. We measured the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal on 26 CT studies of the 24 patients. On 22 of 26 CT studies, the electrodes were placed in the epidural space in the posterior one third of the spinal canal. Complications included misplaced, retained, and broken leads; puncture of the thecal sac; infection; and hematoma. CONCLUSION. Radiologists should be familiar with the different types of electrodes and typical spinal locations of electrodes, leads, and implantable pulse generators. Improper placement of electrodes may lead to ineffective pain relief or to other complications.",
keywords = "CT, Ct myelography, Epidural positioning, Postsurgical complication, Spinal cord stimulator",
author = "Elcin Zan and Kurt, {Kubra Neslihan} and Yousem, {David Mark} and Paul Christo",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.10.4789",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
pages = "437--445",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal cord stimulators

T2 - Typical positioning and postsurgical complications

AU - Zan, Elcin

AU - Kurt, Kubra Neslihan

AU - Yousem, David Mark

AU - Christo, Paul

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is one option for pain control in individuals with chronic lumbosacral radicular or axial lumbar pain. The expected positioning of SCSs based on the location of pain, the types of electrodes (percutaneous vs surgical paddle), and the types of electrode arrays and the potential complications have not been described to date in the radiology literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 5-year retrospective review of the radiology information system at our institution revealed 24 patients with images of 36 SCSs. Those images were reviewed to identify the location and type of electrodes as well as the location of the lead within the spinal canal. Not all implantable pulse generators were within the radiologic field of view. Complications identified by reviewing medical records were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS. Fourteen different types of electrodes were identified. Most were placed in the thoracic spine only, but six thoracolumbar and two cervical spine electrodes were also present. We measured the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal on 26 CT studies of the 24 patients. On 22 of 26 CT studies, the electrodes were placed in the epidural space in the posterior one third of the spinal canal. Complications included misplaced, retained, and broken leads; puncture of the thecal sac; infection; and hematoma. CONCLUSION. Radiologists should be familiar with the different types of electrodes and typical spinal locations of electrodes, leads, and implantable pulse generators. Improper placement of electrodes may lead to ineffective pain relief or to other complications.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Implantation of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is one option for pain control in individuals with chronic lumbosacral radicular or axial lumbar pain. The expected positioning of SCSs based on the location of pain, the types of electrodes (percutaneous vs surgical paddle), and the types of electrode arrays and the potential complications have not been described to date in the radiology literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A 5-year retrospective review of the radiology information system at our institution revealed 24 patients with images of 36 SCSs. Those images were reviewed to identify the location and type of electrodes as well as the location of the lead within the spinal canal. Not all implantable pulse generators were within the radiologic field of view. Complications identified by reviewing medical records were correlated with imaging findings. RESULTS. Fourteen different types of electrodes were identified. Most were placed in the thoracic spine only, but six thoracolumbar and two cervical spine electrodes were also present. We measured the position of the electrodes within the spinal canal on 26 CT studies of the 24 patients. On 22 of 26 CT studies, the electrodes were placed in the epidural space in the posterior one third of the spinal canal. Complications included misplaced, retained, and broken leads; puncture of the thecal sac; infection; and hematoma. CONCLUSION. Radiologists should be familiar with the different types of electrodes and typical spinal locations of electrodes, leads, and implantable pulse generators. Improper placement of electrodes may lead to ineffective pain relief or to other complications.

KW - CT

KW - Ct myelography

KW - Epidural positioning

KW - Postsurgical complication

KW - Spinal cord stimulator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79251522845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79251522845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.10.4789

DO - 10.2214/AJR.10.4789

M3 - Article

VL - 196

SP - 437

EP - 445

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 2

ER -