Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective

Karen E. Boyle, Anthony J. Thomas, Joel L. Marmar, Steven Hirshberg, Arnold M. Belker, Jonathan P. Jarow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is cost-effective. Design: Model of actual costs and results at five institutions. Setting: Multicenter study comprising five centers, including university hospitals and private practices. Patient(s): Men undergoing vasectomy reversal. Intervention(s): We established two models for vasectomy reversal. The first model was sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal. The second model was sperm harvesting at the time of IVF only if the patient remained azoospermic after vasectomy reversal. Vasectomy reversal procedures modeled included bilateral vasovasostomy and bilateral epididymovasostomy. The costs for each procedure at the five institutions were collated and median costs determined. Main Outcome Measure(s): Median cost of procedure and calculated financial comparisons. Result(s): The median cost of testicular sperm extraction/cryopreservation performed at the time of bilateral vasovasostomy was $1,765 (range, $1,025- $2,800). The median cost of microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction with cryopreservation performed at the time of epididymovasostomy was $1,209 (range, $905-$2,488). The average of the median costs for percutaneous sperm aspiration or testicular sperm aspiration for those patients with a failed vasectomy reversal was $725 (range, $400-$1,455). Conclusion(s): Sperm retrieval with cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is not a cost-effective management strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)961-964
Number of pages4
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Vasovasostomy
Cryopreservation
Spermatozoa
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sperm Retrieval
Private Practice
Multicenter Studies

Keywords

  • Epididymovasostomy
  • IVF
  • MESA
  • PESA
  • Sperm cryopreservation
  • Sperm retrieval
  • TESA
  • TESE
  • Vasectomy reversal
  • Vasovasostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Boyle, K. E., Thomas, A. J., Marmar, J. L., Hirshberg, S., Belker, A. M., & Jarow, J. P. (2006). Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective. Fertility and Sterility, 85(4), 961-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.031

Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective. / Boyle, Karen E.; Thomas, Anthony J.; Marmar, Joel L.; Hirshberg, Steven; Belker, Arnold M.; Jarow, Jonathan P.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 85, No. 4, 04.2006, p. 961-964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boyle, KE, Thomas, AJ, Marmar, JL, Hirshberg, S, Belker, AM & Jarow, JP 2006, 'Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective', Fertility and Sterility, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 961-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.031
Boyle, Karen E. ; Thomas, Anthony J. ; Marmar, Joel L. ; Hirshberg, Steven ; Belker, Arnold M. ; Jarow, Jonathan P. / Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2006 ; Vol. 85, No. 4. pp. 961-964.
@article{70323ed93e164b7e8aebc6883c228cfc,
title = "Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is cost-effective. Design: Model of actual costs and results at five institutions. Setting: Multicenter study comprising five centers, including university hospitals and private practices. Patient(s): Men undergoing vasectomy reversal. Intervention(s): We established two models for vasectomy reversal. The first model was sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal. The second model was sperm harvesting at the time of IVF only if the patient remained azoospermic after vasectomy reversal. Vasectomy reversal procedures modeled included bilateral vasovasostomy and bilateral epididymovasostomy. The costs for each procedure at the five institutions were collated and median costs determined. Main Outcome Measure(s): Median cost of procedure and calculated financial comparisons. Result(s): The median cost of testicular sperm extraction/cryopreservation performed at the time of bilateral vasovasostomy was $1,765 (range, $1,025- $2,800). The median cost of microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction with cryopreservation performed at the time of epididymovasostomy was $1,209 (range, $905-$2,488). The average of the median costs for percutaneous sperm aspiration or testicular sperm aspiration for those patients with a failed vasectomy reversal was $725 (range, $400-$1,455). Conclusion(s): Sperm retrieval with cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is not a cost-effective management strategy.",
keywords = "Epididymovasostomy, IVF, MESA, PESA, Sperm cryopreservation, Sperm retrieval, TESA, TESE, Vasectomy reversal, Vasovasostomy",
author = "Boyle, {Karen E.} and Thomas, {Anthony J.} and Marmar, {Joel L.} and Steven Hirshberg and Belker, {Arnold M.} and Jarow, {Jonathan P.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "961--964",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective

AU - Boyle, Karen E.

AU - Thomas, Anthony J.

AU - Marmar, Joel L.

AU - Hirshberg, Steven

AU - Belker, Arnold M.

AU - Jarow, Jonathan P.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Objective: To determine whether sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is cost-effective. Design: Model of actual costs and results at five institutions. Setting: Multicenter study comprising five centers, including university hospitals and private practices. Patient(s): Men undergoing vasectomy reversal. Intervention(s): We established two models for vasectomy reversal. The first model was sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal. The second model was sperm harvesting at the time of IVF only if the patient remained azoospermic after vasectomy reversal. Vasectomy reversal procedures modeled included bilateral vasovasostomy and bilateral epididymovasostomy. The costs for each procedure at the five institutions were collated and median costs determined. Main Outcome Measure(s): Median cost of procedure and calculated financial comparisons. Result(s): The median cost of testicular sperm extraction/cryopreservation performed at the time of bilateral vasovasostomy was $1,765 (range, $1,025- $2,800). The median cost of microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction with cryopreservation performed at the time of epididymovasostomy was $1,209 (range, $905-$2,488). The average of the median costs for percutaneous sperm aspiration or testicular sperm aspiration for those patients with a failed vasectomy reversal was $725 (range, $400-$1,455). Conclusion(s): Sperm retrieval with cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is not a cost-effective management strategy.

AB - Objective: To determine whether sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is cost-effective. Design: Model of actual costs and results at five institutions. Setting: Multicenter study comprising five centers, including university hospitals and private practices. Patient(s): Men undergoing vasectomy reversal. Intervention(s): We established two models for vasectomy reversal. The first model was sperm harvesting and cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal. The second model was sperm harvesting at the time of IVF only if the patient remained azoospermic after vasectomy reversal. Vasectomy reversal procedures modeled included bilateral vasovasostomy and bilateral epididymovasostomy. The costs for each procedure at the five institutions were collated and median costs determined. Main Outcome Measure(s): Median cost of procedure and calculated financial comparisons. Result(s): The median cost of testicular sperm extraction/cryopreservation performed at the time of bilateral vasovasostomy was $1,765 (range, $1,025- $2,800). The median cost of microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration or testicular sperm extraction with cryopreservation performed at the time of epididymovasostomy was $1,209 (range, $905-$2,488). The average of the median costs for percutaneous sperm aspiration or testicular sperm aspiration for those patients with a failed vasectomy reversal was $725 (range, $400-$1,455). Conclusion(s): Sperm retrieval with cryopreservation at the time of vasectomy reversal is not a cost-effective management strategy.

KW - Epididymovasostomy

KW - IVF

KW - MESA

KW - PESA

KW - Sperm cryopreservation

KW - Sperm retrieval

KW - TESA

KW - TESE

KW - Vasectomy reversal

KW - Vasovasostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645391063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645391063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.031

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 16580381

AN - SCOPUS:33645391063

VL - 85

SP - 961

EP - 964

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 4

ER -