Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography

D. M. Herrington, M. Siebes, Gary D Walford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many studies have reported the accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) based on experiments using moderated-size phantoms imaged under unrealistic radiographic conditions. However, these observations may not be generalizable to the setting of clinical angiography. To determine QCA accuracy in a realistic radiographic setting and evaluate the impact of the x-ray system line spread function, plexiglass phantoms were imaged inside and out of a human thorax. A realistic radiographic background was associated with a 38% increase in variability of results (p <0.05). Low concentrations of contrast and large image intensifier input screens were associated with significantly larger errors and variability in results (p <0.05). There was a systematic overestimation of diameter in the smallest phantom. A mathematical model of the x-ray line spread function was developed that explains the observed overestimation of the smallest phantom and provide a rational approach for correction of the line spread function for QCA. Many factors encountered in clinical coronary angiography such as nonuniform radiographic background, low concentrations of contrast, and small vessel diameters have a significant adverse impact on the accuracy and/or variability of gradient-based edge detection QCA systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-321
Number of pages8
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis
Volume29
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Coronary Angiography
Research Design
X-Rays
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Angiography
Theoretical Models
Thorax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography. / Herrington, D. M.; Siebes, M.; Walford, Gary D.

In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1993, p. 314-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herrington, D. M. ; Siebes, M. ; Walford, Gary D. / Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography. In: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis. 1993 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 314-321.
@article{163a51ff01ab4a88a9b817bfe10b1378,
title = "Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography",
abstract = "Many studies have reported the accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) based on experiments using moderated-size phantoms imaged under unrealistic radiographic conditions. However, these observations may not be generalizable to the setting of clinical angiography. To determine QCA accuracy in a realistic radiographic setting and evaluate the impact of the x-ray system line spread function, plexiglass phantoms were imaged inside and out of a human thorax. A realistic radiographic background was associated with a 38{\%} increase in variability of results (p <0.05). Low concentrations of contrast and large image intensifier input screens were associated with significantly larger errors and variability in results (p <0.05). There was a systematic overestimation of diameter in the smallest phantom. A mathematical model of the x-ray line spread function was developed that explains the observed overestimation of the smallest phantom and provide a rational approach for correction of the line spread function for QCA. Many factors encountered in clinical coronary angiography such as nonuniform radiographic background, low concentrations of contrast, and small vessel diameters have a significant adverse impact on the accuracy and/or variability of gradient-based edge detection QCA systems.",
author = "Herrington, {D. M.} and M. Siebes and Walford, {Gary D}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "314--321",
journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1522-1946",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography

AU - Herrington, D. M.

AU - Siebes, M.

AU - Walford, Gary D

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Many studies have reported the accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) based on experiments using moderated-size phantoms imaged under unrealistic radiographic conditions. However, these observations may not be generalizable to the setting of clinical angiography. To determine QCA accuracy in a realistic radiographic setting and evaluate the impact of the x-ray system line spread function, plexiglass phantoms were imaged inside and out of a human thorax. A realistic radiographic background was associated with a 38% increase in variability of results (p <0.05). Low concentrations of contrast and large image intensifier input screens were associated with significantly larger errors and variability in results (p <0.05). There was a systematic overestimation of diameter in the smallest phantom. A mathematical model of the x-ray line spread function was developed that explains the observed overestimation of the smallest phantom and provide a rational approach for correction of the line spread function for QCA. Many factors encountered in clinical coronary angiography such as nonuniform radiographic background, low concentrations of contrast, and small vessel diameters have a significant adverse impact on the accuracy and/or variability of gradient-based edge detection QCA systems.

AB - Many studies have reported the accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) based on experiments using moderated-size phantoms imaged under unrealistic radiographic conditions. However, these observations may not be generalizable to the setting of clinical angiography. To determine QCA accuracy in a realistic radiographic setting and evaluate the impact of the x-ray system line spread function, plexiglass phantoms were imaged inside and out of a human thorax. A realistic radiographic background was associated with a 38% increase in variability of results (p <0.05). Low concentrations of contrast and large image intensifier input screens were associated with significantly larger errors and variability in results (p <0.05). There was a systematic overestimation of diameter in the smallest phantom. A mathematical model of the x-ray line spread function was developed that explains the observed overestimation of the smallest phantom and provide a rational approach for correction of the line spread function for QCA. Many factors encountered in clinical coronary angiography such as nonuniform radiographic background, low concentrations of contrast, and small vessel diameters have a significant adverse impact on the accuracy and/or variability of gradient-based edge detection QCA systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027165740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027165740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 314

EP - 321

JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1522-1946

IS - 4

ER -