Sometimes you can't make it on your own: The impact of a professionalism curriculum on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of an academic plastic surgery practice

Charles Scott Hultman, Eric G. Halvorson, Donna Kaye, Richard Helgans, Michael O. Meyers, Pamela A. Rowland, Anthony A. Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Professionalism is now recognized as a core competency for graduate medical education and maintenance of certification. However, few models exist in plastic surgery that define, teach, and assess professionalism as a competency. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a professionalism curriculum in an academic plastic surgery practice. Methods: We created and conducted a 6-wk, 12-h course for health care professionals in plastic surgery (faculty, residents, nurses, medical students). Teaching methods included didactic lectures, journal club, small group discussions, and book review. Topics included: (1) Professionalism in Our Culture, (2) Leadership Styles, (3) Modeling Professional Behavior, (4) Leading Your Team, (5) Managing Oneself, and (6) Leading While You Work. Using Kirkpatrick methodology to assess perception of the course (level 1 data), learning of the material (level 2 data), effect on behavior (level 3 data), and impact on the organization (level 4 data), we compiled participant questionnaires, scores from pre- and post-tests, and such metrics as incidence of sentinel events (defined as infractions requiring involvement by senior administrators), number of patient complaints reported to Patient Relations, and patient satisfaction (Press Ganey surveys), for the 6 mo before and after the course. Results: Thirty health care professionals participated in a 6-wk course, designed to improve professionalism in plastic surgery. Level 1 data: Although only 56.5% of respondents felt that the course was a "good use of my time," 73.9% agreed that the course "will help me become a better professional" and 82.6% "would recommend the course to others." Level 2 data: Post-test scores increased from 48% to 70% (P < 0.05), and the ability to recall all six competencies increased from 22% to 73% (P < 0.01). Level 3 data: The number of sentinel events in our division decreased from 13 to three. After the course, one resident was placed on probation and resigned, and two other employees left the division after being counseled on issues of professionalism. Interestingly, these participants did very well on the post-test but were not considered to be "team players." Level 4 data: Patient complaints decreased from 14 to eight, and patient satisfaction increased from 85.5% to 90.5%. Conclusions: A focused curriculum in professionalism may improve the knowledge of participants and overall behavior of the group, but may not affect individual attitudes. Nevertheless, efforts toward assessing, teaching, and influencing professionalism in plastic surgery are very valuable and should be pursued by educators to help satisfy Graduate Medical Education/Maintenance of Certification requirements and to improve the performance of the organization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-14
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume180
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Curriculum
Graduate Medical Education
Certification
Patient Satisfaction
Teaching
Maintenance
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care
Aptitude
Professionalism
Administrative Personnel
Medical Students
Nurses
Learning
Incidence
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Plastic surgery
  • Professionalism
  • Surgical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Sometimes you can't make it on your own : The impact of a professionalism curriculum on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of an academic plastic surgery practice. / Hultman, Charles Scott; Halvorson, Eric G.; Kaye, Donna; Helgans, Richard; Meyers, Michael O.; Rowland, Pamela A.; Meyer, Anthony A.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 180, No. 1, 01.03.2013, p. 8-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hultman, Charles Scott ; Halvorson, Eric G. ; Kaye, Donna ; Helgans, Richard ; Meyers, Michael O. ; Rowland, Pamela A. ; Meyer, Anthony A. / Sometimes you can't make it on your own : The impact of a professionalism curriculum on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of an academic plastic surgery practice. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2013 ; Vol. 180, No. 1. pp. 8-14.
@article{d49f9596a5bd4c1c8209f20c27a92732,
title = "Sometimes you can't make it on your own: The impact of a professionalism curriculum on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of an academic plastic surgery practice",
abstract = "Introduction: Professionalism is now recognized as a core competency for graduate medical education and maintenance of certification. However, few models exist in plastic surgery that define, teach, and assess professionalism as a competency. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a professionalism curriculum in an academic plastic surgery practice. Methods: We created and conducted a 6-wk, 12-h course for health care professionals in plastic surgery (faculty, residents, nurses, medical students). Teaching methods included didactic lectures, journal club, small group discussions, and book review. Topics included: (1) Professionalism in Our Culture, (2) Leadership Styles, (3) Modeling Professional Behavior, (4) Leading Your Team, (5) Managing Oneself, and (6) Leading While You Work. Using Kirkpatrick methodology to assess perception of the course (level 1 data), learning of the material (level 2 data), effect on behavior (level 3 data), and impact on the organization (level 4 data), we compiled participant questionnaires, scores from pre- and post-tests, and such metrics as incidence of sentinel events (defined as infractions requiring involvement by senior administrators), number of patient complaints reported to Patient Relations, and patient satisfaction (Press Ganey surveys), for the 6 mo before and after the course. Results: Thirty health care professionals participated in a 6-wk course, designed to improve professionalism in plastic surgery. Level 1 data: Although only 56.5{\%} of respondents felt that the course was a {"}good use of my time,{"} 73.9{\%} agreed that the course {"}will help me become a better professional{"} and 82.6{\%} {"}would recommend the course to others.{"} Level 2 data: Post-test scores increased from 48{\%} to 70{\%} (P < 0.05), and the ability to recall all six competencies increased from 22{\%} to 73{\%} (P < 0.01). Level 3 data: The number of sentinel events in our division decreased from 13 to three. After the course, one resident was placed on probation and resigned, and two other employees left the division after being counseled on issues of professionalism. Interestingly, these participants did very well on the post-test but were not considered to be {"}team players.{"} Level 4 data: Patient complaints decreased from 14 to eight, and patient satisfaction increased from 85.5{\%} to 90.5{\%}. Conclusions: A focused curriculum in professionalism may improve the knowledge of participants and overall behavior of the group, but may not affect individual attitudes. Nevertheless, efforts toward assessing, teaching, and influencing professionalism in plastic surgery are very valuable and should be pursued by educators to help satisfy Graduate Medical Education/Maintenance of Certification requirements and to improve the performance of the organization.",
keywords = "Plastic surgery, Professionalism, Surgical education",
author = "Hultman, {Charles Scott} and Halvorson, {Eric G.} and Donna Kaye and Richard Helgans and Meyers, {Michael O.} and Rowland, {Pamela A.} and Meyer, {Anthony A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "180",
pages = "8--14",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sometimes you can't make it on your own

T2 - The impact of a professionalism curriculum on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of an academic plastic surgery practice

AU - Hultman, Charles Scott

AU - Halvorson, Eric G.

AU - Kaye, Donna

AU - Helgans, Richard

AU - Meyers, Michael O.

AU - Rowland, Pamela A.

AU - Meyer, Anthony A.

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Introduction: Professionalism is now recognized as a core competency for graduate medical education and maintenance of certification. However, few models exist in plastic surgery that define, teach, and assess professionalism as a competency. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a professionalism curriculum in an academic plastic surgery practice. Methods: We created and conducted a 6-wk, 12-h course for health care professionals in plastic surgery (faculty, residents, nurses, medical students). Teaching methods included didactic lectures, journal club, small group discussions, and book review. Topics included: (1) Professionalism in Our Culture, (2) Leadership Styles, (3) Modeling Professional Behavior, (4) Leading Your Team, (5) Managing Oneself, and (6) Leading While You Work. Using Kirkpatrick methodology to assess perception of the course (level 1 data), learning of the material (level 2 data), effect on behavior (level 3 data), and impact on the organization (level 4 data), we compiled participant questionnaires, scores from pre- and post-tests, and such metrics as incidence of sentinel events (defined as infractions requiring involvement by senior administrators), number of patient complaints reported to Patient Relations, and patient satisfaction (Press Ganey surveys), for the 6 mo before and after the course. Results: Thirty health care professionals participated in a 6-wk course, designed to improve professionalism in plastic surgery. Level 1 data: Although only 56.5% of respondents felt that the course was a "good use of my time," 73.9% agreed that the course "will help me become a better professional" and 82.6% "would recommend the course to others." Level 2 data: Post-test scores increased from 48% to 70% (P < 0.05), and the ability to recall all six competencies increased from 22% to 73% (P < 0.01). Level 3 data: The number of sentinel events in our division decreased from 13 to three. After the course, one resident was placed on probation and resigned, and two other employees left the division after being counseled on issues of professionalism. Interestingly, these participants did very well on the post-test but were not considered to be "team players." Level 4 data: Patient complaints decreased from 14 to eight, and patient satisfaction increased from 85.5% to 90.5%. Conclusions: A focused curriculum in professionalism may improve the knowledge of participants and overall behavior of the group, but may not affect individual attitudes. Nevertheless, efforts toward assessing, teaching, and influencing professionalism in plastic surgery are very valuable and should be pursued by educators to help satisfy Graduate Medical Education/Maintenance of Certification requirements and to improve the performance of the organization.

AB - Introduction: Professionalism is now recognized as a core competency for graduate medical education and maintenance of certification. However, few models exist in plastic surgery that define, teach, and assess professionalism as a competency. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a professionalism curriculum in an academic plastic surgery practice. Methods: We created and conducted a 6-wk, 12-h course for health care professionals in plastic surgery (faculty, residents, nurses, medical students). Teaching methods included didactic lectures, journal club, small group discussions, and book review. Topics included: (1) Professionalism in Our Culture, (2) Leadership Styles, (3) Modeling Professional Behavior, (4) Leading Your Team, (5) Managing Oneself, and (6) Leading While You Work. Using Kirkpatrick methodology to assess perception of the course (level 1 data), learning of the material (level 2 data), effect on behavior (level 3 data), and impact on the organization (level 4 data), we compiled participant questionnaires, scores from pre- and post-tests, and such metrics as incidence of sentinel events (defined as infractions requiring involvement by senior administrators), number of patient complaints reported to Patient Relations, and patient satisfaction (Press Ganey surveys), for the 6 mo before and after the course. Results: Thirty health care professionals participated in a 6-wk course, designed to improve professionalism in plastic surgery. Level 1 data: Although only 56.5% of respondents felt that the course was a "good use of my time," 73.9% agreed that the course "will help me become a better professional" and 82.6% "would recommend the course to others." Level 2 data: Post-test scores increased from 48% to 70% (P < 0.05), and the ability to recall all six competencies increased from 22% to 73% (P < 0.01). Level 3 data: The number of sentinel events in our division decreased from 13 to three. After the course, one resident was placed on probation and resigned, and two other employees left the division after being counseled on issues of professionalism. Interestingly, these participants did very well on the post-test but were not considered to be "team players." Level 4 data: Patient complaints decreased from 14 to eight, and patient satisfaction increased from 85.5% to 90.5%. Conclusions: A focused curriculum in professionalism may improve the knowledge of participants and overall behavior of the group, but may not affect individual attitudes. Nevertheless, efforts toward assessing, teaching, and influencing professionalism in plastic surgery are very valuable and should be pursued by educators to help satisfy Graduate Medical Education/Maintenance of Certification requirements and to improve the performance of the organization.

KW - Plastic surgery

KW - Professionalism

KW - Surgical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873705205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873705205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 23312813

AN - SCOPUS:84873705205

VL - 180

SP - 8

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -