Social value judgments in healthcare: A philosophical critique

Laura Biron, Benedict Rumbold, Ruth R Faden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to consider some of the philosophical and bioethical issues raised by the creation of the draft social values framework developed to facilitate data collection and country-specific presentations at the inaugural workshop on "Social values and health priority setting" held in February 2011. Design/methodology/approach: Conceptual analysis is used to analyse the term "social values", as employed in the framework, and its relationship to related ideas such as moral values. The structure of the framework (process and content values) is considered in light of current debate in philosophy and bioethics about the political and moral aims served by these kinds of values, and the extent to which they are either suited to, or sufficient for, the policy context. Findings: There is much to be gained by engaging with the arguments presented in the philosophical literature in order to further refine the framework. The framework should remain neutral in respect of the importance of procedural values in different contexts and should be as inclusive as possible in respect of the principles it includes. Further development would be best served by taking a multidisciplinary approach. The framework could provide a valuable space in which future debates about procedural/substantive values can be considered. Originality/value: The paper brings philosophical and bioethics perspectives to bear on a new framework proposed for the analysis of social values in health priority setting. It identifies how such a practical, policy-focused framework might be informed by engagement with deeper, and often unresolved, questions or principle around resource allocation in health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-330
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Health, Organisation and Management
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Social Values
Delivery of Health Care
Health Priorities
Bioethics
Bioethical Issues
Resource Allocation
Education
Value judgements
Social values
Healthcare
Health

Keywords

  • Bioethics
  • Health care
  • Health policy
  • Moral values
  • Philosophy
  • Social values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Social value judgments in healthcare : A philosophical critique. / Biron, Laura; Rumbold, Benedict; Faden, Ruth R.

In: Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 317-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da28a8a28ff840c68ff0a7f548a5d49a,
title = "Social value judgments in healthcare: A philosophical critique",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to consider some of the philosophical and bioethical issues raised by the creation of the draft social values framework developed to facilitate data collection and country-specific presentations at the inaugural workshop on {"}Social values and health priority setting{"} held in February 2011. Design/methodology/approach: Conceptual analysis is used to analyse the term {"}social values{"}, as employed in the framework, and its relationship to related ideas such as moral values. The structure of the framework (process and content values) is considered in light of current debate in philosophy and bioethics about the political and moral aims served by these kinds of values, and the extent to which they are either suited to, or sufficient for, the policy context. Findings: There is much to be gained by engaging with the arguments presented in the philosophical literature in order to further refine the framework. The framework should remain neutral in respect of the importance of procedural values in different contexts and should be as inclusive as possible in respect of the principles it includes. Further development would be best served by taking a multidisciplinary approach. The framework could provide a valuable space in which future debates about procedural/substantive values can be considered. Originality/value: The paper brings philosophical and bioethics perspectives to bear on a new framework proposed for the analysis of social values in health priority setting. It identifies how such a practical, policy-focused framework might be informed by engagement with deeper, and often unresolved, questions or principle around resource allocation in health.",
keywords = "Bioethics, Health care, Health policy, Moral values, Philosophy, Social values",
author = "Laura Biron and Benedict Rumbold and Faden, {Ruth R}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1108/14777261211238963",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "317--330",
journal = "Journal of Health Organization and Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social value judgments in healthcare

T2 - A philosophical critique

AU - Biron, Laura

AU - Rumbold, Benedict

AU - Faden, Ruth R

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to consider some of the philosophical and bioethical issues raised by the creation of the draft social values framework developed to facilitate data collection and country-specific presentations at the inaugural workshop on "Social values and health priority setting" held in February 2011. Design/methodology/approach: Conceptual analysis is used to analyse the term "social values", as employed in the framework, and its relationship to related ideas such as moral values. The structure of the framework (process and content values) is considered in light of current debate in philosophy and bioethics about the political and moral aims served by these kinds of values, and the extent to which they are either suited to, or sufficient for, the policy context. Findings: There is much to be gained by engaging with the arguments presented in the philosophical literature in order to further refine the framework. The framework should remain neutral in respect of the importance of procedural values in different contexts and should be as inclusive as possible in respect of the principles it includes. Further development would be best served by taking a multidisciplinary approach. The framework could provide a valuable space in which future debates about procedural/substantive values can be considered. Originality/value: The paper brings philosophical and bioethics perspectives to bear on a new framework proposed for the analysis of social values in health priority setting. It identifies how such a practical, policy-focused framework might be informed by engagement with deeper, and often unresolved, questions or principle around resource allocation in health.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to consider some of the philosophical and bioethical issues raised by the creation of the draft social values framework developed to facilitate data collection and country-specific presentations at the inaugural workshop on "Social values and health priority setting" held in February 2011. Design/methodology/approach: Conceptual analysis is used to analyse the term "social values", as employed in the framework, and its relationship to related ideas such as moral values. The structure of the framework (process and content values) is considered in light of current debate in philosophy and bioethics about the political and moral aims served by these kinds of values, and the extent to which they are either suited to, or sufficient for, the policy context. Findings: There is much to be gained by engaging with the arguments presented in the philosophical literature in order to further refine the framework. The framework should remain neutral in respect of the importance of procedural values in different contexts and should be as inclusive as possible in respect of the principles it includes. Further development would be best served by taking a multidisciplinary approach. The framework could provide a valuable space in which future debates about procedural/substantive values can be considered. Originality/value: The paper brings philosophical and bioethics perspectives to bear on a new framework proposed for the analysis of social values in health priority setting. It identifies how such a practical, policy-focused framework might be informed by engagement with deeper, and often unresolved, questions or principle around resource allocation in health.

KW - Bioethics

KW - Health care

KW - Health policy

KW - Moral values

KW - Philosophy

KW - Social values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861308184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861308184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14777261211238963

DO - 10.1108/14777261211238963

M3 - Article

C2 - 22852454

AN - SCOPUS:84861308184

VL - 26

SP - 317

EP - 330

JO - Journal of Health Organization and Management

JF - Journal of Health Organization and Management

SN - 1477-7266

IS - 3

ER -