Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection

Giulio Canlù, Carlo L. Soient, Franco Mattavelli, Natalia Pizzi, Stefano Riccio, Francesco Dimeco, Gabriella Bimbi, Massimo Squadrelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ketcham popularized the craniofacial resection for tumors of the paranasal sinuses involving the anterior skull base. His pioneering experience fostered the work of many others, leading to surgical removal of tumors with intracranial extension. Many technical advances were gradually introduced but without changing the basic concept of block resection. An unnatural communication between intra- and extracranial spaces is the result of such operations, irrespective of the technique used. The repair of a skull base defect has been the object of heated discussions, and many variations have been proposed. The simple reconstruction of Ketcham has been followed by more sophisticated procedures using galeal-pericranial flaps, free flaps with microvascular anastomosis and bony or alloplastic augmentation. Ketcham did not repair the skull base; he used only a split-thickness skin graft placed on the dura. He had many complications but never brain herniation. The reasons advanced by those who support sophisticated repairs are, to supply adequate structural support for the intracranial contents, thereby preventing brain herniation: avoid intracranial infections; diminish the risk of CSF leakage; and avoid pneuinocephalus. Between 1987 and 1999, 200 patients underwent an anterior craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors at the Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumor of Milan, Italy. We perform a coronal skin and galea incision, by raising the skin and galea and preparing a rectangular anteriorly pedicled pericranial flap. The frontal craniotomy measures 7x3 cm. Its inferior edge is 1 cm above the orbital roofs, thus sparing supraorbital vessels and nerves. After the resection of the tumor, our skull base reconstruction is very simple. We make 6 little holes on the bony edges of the skull base defect, 2 on the residual sphenoid roof and 4 laterally on the orbit roofs. The pericranial flap is brought back and into the cranium and fixed with 6 sutures to these holes. We do not use bone or alloplastic augmentation. When an orbital clearance or a total maxillectomy is performed, we use the temporal muscle (26 cases) or a free flap (6 cases) for coverage. We never had brain herniation; CSF leak occured in 18 patients, none of whom required reoperation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50
Number of pages1
JournalSkull Base
Volume11
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Skull Base
Free Tissue Flaps
Neoplasms
Skin
Brain
Temporal Muscle
Surgical Flaps
Craniotomy
Paranasal Sinuses
Orbit
Reoperation
Skull
Sutures
Italy
Communication
Transplants
Bone and Bones
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Canlù, G., Soient, C. L., Mattavelli, F., Pizzi, N., Riccio, S., Dimeco, F., ... Squadrelli, M. (2001). Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection. Skull Base, 11(SUPPL. 2), 50.

Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection. / Canlù, Giulio; Soient, Carlo L.; Mattavelli, Franco; Pizzi, Natalia; Riccio, Stefano; Dimeco, Francesco; Bimbi, Gabriella; Squadrelli, Massimo.

In: Skull Base, Vol. 11, No. SUPPL. 2, 2001, p. 50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Canlù, G, Soient, CL, Mattavelli, F, Pizzi, N, Riccio, S, Dimeco, F, Bimbi, G & Squadrelli, M 2001, 'Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection', Skull Base, vol. 11, no. SUPPL. 2, pp. 50.
Canlù G, Soient CL, Mattavelli F, Pizzi N, Riccio S, Dimeco F et al. Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection. Skull Base. 2001;11(SUPPL. 2):50.
Canlù, Giulio ; Soient, Carlo L. ; Mattavelli, Franco ; Pizzi, Natalia ; Riccio, Stefano ; Dimeco, Francesco ; Bimbi, Gabriella ; Squadrelli, Massimo. / Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection. In: Skull Base. 2001 ; Vol. 11, No. SUPPL. 2. pp. 50.
@article{96c5b9b0575b4f3f8363ce064ed1a5a4,
title = "Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection",
abstract = "Ketcham popularized the craniofacial resection for tumors of the paranasal sinuses involving the anterior skull base. His pioneering experience fostered the work of many others, leading to surgical removal of tumors with intracranial extension. Many technical advances were gradually introduced but without changing the basic concept of block resection. An unnatural communication between intra- and extracranial spaces is the result of such operations, irrespective of the technique used. The repair of a skull base defect has been the object of heated discussions, and many variations have been proposed. The simple reconstruction of Ketcham has been followed by more sophisticated procedures using galeal-pericranial flaps, free flaps with microvascular anastomosis and bony or alloplastic augmentation. Ketcham did not repair the skull base; he used only a split-thickness skin graft placed on the dura. He had many complications but never brain herniation. The reasons advanced by those who support sophisticated repairs are, to supply adequate structural support for the intracranial contents, thereby preventing brain herniation: avoid intracranial infections; diminish the risk of CSF leakage; and avoid pneuinocephalus. Between 1987 and 1999, 200 patients underwent an anterior craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors at the Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumor of Milan, Italy. We perform a coronal skin and galea incision, by raising the skin and galea and preparing a rectangular anteriorly pedicled pericranial flap. The frontal craniotomy measures 7x3 cm. Its inferior edge is 1 cm above the orbital roofs, thus sparing supraorbital vessels and nerves. After the resection of the tumor, our skull base reconstruction is very simple. We make 6 little holes on the bony edges of the skull base defect, 2 on the residual sphenoid roof and 4 laterally on the orbit roofs. The pericranial flap is brought back and into the cranium and fixed with 6 sutures to these holes. We do not use bone or alloplastic augmentation. When an orbital clearance or a total maxillectomy is performed, we use the temporal muscle (26 cases) or a free flap (6 cases) for coverage. We never had brain herniation; CSF leak occured in 18 patients, none of whom required reoperation.",
author = "Giulio Canl{\`u} and Soient, {Carlo L.} and Franco Mattavelli and Natalia Pizzi and Stefano Riccio and Francesco Dimeco and Gabriella Bimbi and Massimo Squadrelli",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "50",
journal = "Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base",
issn = "2193-6331",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skull base reconstruction after anterior craniofacial resection

AU - Canlù, Giulio

AU - Soient, Carlo L.

AU - Mattavelli, Franco

AU - Pizzi, Natalia

AU - Riccio, Stefano

AU - Dimeco, Francesco

AU - Bimbi, Gabriella

AU - Squadrelli, Massimo

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Ketcham popularized the craniofacial resection for tumors of the paranasal sinuses involving the anterior skull base. His pioneering experience fostered the work of many others, leading to surgical removal of tumors with intracranial extension. Many technical advances were gradually introduced but without changing the basic concept of block resection. An unnatural communication between intra- and extracranial spaces is the result of such operations, irrespective of the technique used. The repair of a skull base defect has been the object of heated discussions, and many variations have been proposed. The simple reconstruction of Ketcham has been followed by more sophisticated procedures using galeal-pericranial flaps, free flaps with microvascular anastomosis and bony or alloplastic augmentation. Ketcham did not repair the skull base; he used only a split-thickness skin graft placed on the dura. He had many complications but never brain herniation. The reasons advanced by those who support sophisticated repairs are, to supply adequate structural support for the intracranial contents, thereby preventing brain herniation: avoid intracranial infections; diminish the risk of CSF leakage; and avoid pneuinocephalus. Between 1987 and 1999, 200 patients underwent an anterior craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors at the Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumor of Milan, Italy. We perform a coronal skin and galea incision, by raising the skin and galea and preparing a rectangular anteriorly pedicled pericranial flap. The frontal craniotomy measures 7x3 cm. Its inferior edge is 1 cm above the orbital roofs, thus sparing supraorbital vessels and nerves. After the resection of the tumor, our skull base reconstruction is very simple. We make 6 little holes on the bony edges of the skull base defect, 2 on the residual sphenoid roof and 4 laterally on the orbit roofs. The pericranial flap is brought back and into the cranium and fixed with 6 sutures to these holes. We do not use bone or alloplastic augmentation. When an orbital clearance or a total maxillectomy is performed, we use the temporal muscle (26 cases) or a free flap (6 cases) for coverage. We never had brain herniation; CSF leak occured in 18 patients, none of whom required reoperation.

AB - Ketcham popularized the craniofacial resection for tumors of the paranasal sinuses involving the anterior skull base. His pioneering experience fostered the work of many others, leading to surgical removal of tumors with intracranial extension. Many technical advances were gradually introduced but without changing the basic concept of block resection. An unnatural communication between intra- and extracranial spaces is the result of such operations, irrespective of the technique used. The repair of a skull base defect has been the object of heated discussions, and many variations have been proposed. The simple reconstruction of Ketcham has been followed by more sophisticated procedures using galeal-pericranial flaps, free flaps with microvascular anastomosis and bony or alloplastic augmentation. Ketcham did not repair the skull base; he used only a split-thickness skin graft placed on the dura. He had many complications but never brain herniation. The reasons advanced by those who support sophisticated repairs are, to supply adequate structural support for the intracranial contents, thereby preventing brain herniation: avoid intracranial infections; diminish the risk of CSF leakage; and avoid pneuinocephalus. Between 1987 and 1999, 200 patients underwent an anterior craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors at the Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumor of Milan, Italy. We perform a coronal skin and galea incision, by raising the skin and galea and preparing a rectangular anteriorly pedicled pericranial flap. The frontal craniotomy measures 7x3 cm. Its inferior edge is 1 cm above the orbital roofs, thus sparing supraorbital vessels and nerves. After the resection of the tumor, our skull base reconstruction is very simple. We make 6 little holes on the bony edges of the skull base defect, 2 on the residual sphenoid roof and 4 laterally on the orbit roofs. The pericranial flap is brought back and into the cranium and fixed with 6 sutures to these holes. We do not use bone or alloplastic augmentation. When an orbital clearance or a total maxillectomy is performed, we use the temporal muscle (26 cases) or a free flap (6 cases) for coverage. We never had brain herniation; CSF leak occured in 18 patients, none of whom required reoperation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747810528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747810528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 50

JO - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

JF - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

SN - 2193-6331

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -