Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex: Possible role of flocculus

S. G. Lisberger, F. A. Miles, David Samuel Zee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

1. Adaptive changes were induced in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of monkeys by oscillating them while they viewed the visual scene through optical devices ('spectacles') that required changes in the amplitude of eye movement during head turns. The 'gain' of the VOR (eye velocity divided by head velocity) during sinusoidal oscillation in darkness underwent gradual changes that were appropriate to reduce the motion of images on the retina during the adapting procedures. 2. Bilateral ablation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus caused a complete and enduring loss of the ability to undergo adaptive changes in the VOR. Partial lesions caused a substantial but incomplete loss of the adaptive capability. We conclude that the flocculus is necessary for adaptive changes in the monkey's VOR. 3. Further experiments in normal animals determined the types of stimuli that were necessary and/or sufficient to cause changes in VOR gain. 4. Full-field visual stimulation was not necessary to induce adaptive changes in the VOR. Monkeys tracked a small spot in the conditions that elicited the same combination of eye and head movements seen during passive oscillation with spectacles. The gain of the VOR showed changes 50-70% as large as those produced by the same duration of oscillation with spectacles. Since the effective tracking conditions cause a consistent correlation of floccular output with vestibular inputs, these data are compatible with our previous suggestion (20) that the flocculus may provide signals used by the central nervous system to compute errors in the gain of the VOR. 5. Prolonged sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation with the head stationary caused only a slight increase in VOR gain. Left-right reversal of vision and eye movement during sinusoidal vestibular oscillation caused decreases in VOR gain. In rabbits, both of these stimulus conditions produced large increases in the gain of the VOR (3), which implied that eye velocity signals were used instead of vestibular inputs to compute errors in the VOR. Our different results argue that vestibular signals are necessary for computing errors in VOR gain in the monkey. The species difference may reflect the additional role that smooth pursuit eye movements play in stabilizing gaze during head turns in monkeys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1140-1153
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume52
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex
Haplorhini
Eye Movements
Head
Smooth Pursuit
Optical Devices
Head Movements
Photic Stimulation
Aptitude
Darkness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex : Possible role of flocculus. / Lisberger, S. G.; Miles, F. A.; Zee, David Samuel.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 52, No. 6, 1984, p. 1140-1153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb8ca45cd19a4433bf24c3a8e2ee0fb5,
title = "Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex: Possible role of flocculus",
abstract = "1. Adaptive changes were induced in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of monkeys by oscillating them while they viewed the visual scene through optical devices ('spectacles') that required changes in the amplitude of eye movement during head turns. The 'gain' of the VOR (eye velocity divided by head velocity) during sinusoidal oscillation in darkness underwent gradual changes that were appropriate to reduce the motion of images on the retina during the adapting procedures. 2. Bilateral ablation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus caused a complete and enduring loss of the ability to undergo adaptive changes in the VOR. Partial lesions caused a substantial but incomplete loss of the adaptive capability. We conclude that the flocculus is necessary for adaptive changes in the monkey's VOR. 3. Further experiments in normal animals determined the types of stimuli that were necessary and/or sufficient to cause changes in VOR gain. 4. Full-field visual stimulation was not necessary to induce adaptive changes in the VOR. Monkeys tracked a small spot in the conditions that elicited the same combination of eye and head movements seen during passive oscillation with spectacles. The gain of the VOR showed changes 50-70{\%} as large as those produced by the same duration of oscillation with spectacles. Since the effective tracking conditions cause a consistent correlation of floccular output with vestibular inputs, these data are compatible with our previous suggestion (20) that the flocculus may provide signals used by the central nervous system to compute errors in the gain of the VOR. 5. Prolonged sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation with the head stationary caused only a slight increase in VOR gain. Left-right reversal of vision and eye movement during sinusoidal vestibular oscillation caused decreases in VOR gain. In rabbits, both of these stimulus conditions produced large increases in the gain of the VOR (3), which implied that eye velocity signals were used instead of vestibular inputs to compute errors in the VOR. Our different results argue that vestibular signals are necessary for computing errors in VOR gain in the monkey. The species difference may reflect the additional role that smooth pursuit eye movements play in stabilizing gaze during head turns in monkeys.",
author = "Lisberger, {S. G.} and Miles, {F. A.} and Zee, {David Samuel}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1140--1153",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex

T2 - Possible role of flocculus

AU - Lisberger, S. G.

AU - Miles, F. A.

AU - Zee, David Samuel

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - 1. Adaptive changes were induced in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of monkeys by oscillating them while they viewed the visual scene through optical devices ('spectacles') that required changes in the amplitude of eye movement during head turns. The 'gain' of the VOR (eye velocity divided by head velocity) during sinusoidal oscillation in darkness underwent gradual changes that were appropriate to reduce the motion of images on the retina during the adapting procedures. 2. Bilateral ablation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus caused a complete and enduring loss of the ability to undergo adaptive changes in the VOR. Partial lesions caused a substantial but incomplete loss of the adaptive capability. We conclude that the flocculus is necessary for adaptive changes in the monkey's VOR. 3. Further experiments in normal animals determined the types of stimuli that were necessary and/or sufficient to cause changes in VOR gain. 4. Full-field visual stimulation was not necessary to induce adaptive changes in the VOR. Monkeys tracked a small spot in the conditions that elicited the same combination of eye and head movements seen during passive oscillation with spectacles. The gain of the VOR showed changes 50-70% as large as those produced by the same duration of oscillation with spectacles. Since the effective tracking conditions cause a consistent correlation of floccular output with vestibular inputs, these data are compatible with our previous suggestion (20) that the flocculus may provide signals used by the central nervous system to compute errors in the gain of the VOR. 5. Prolonged sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation with the head stationary caused only a slight increase in VOR gain. Left-right reversal of vision and eye movement during sinusoidal vestibular oscillation caused decreases in VOR gain. In rabbits, both of these stimulus conditions produced large increases in the gain of the VOR (3), which implied that eye velocity signals were used instead of vestibular inputs to compute errors in the VOR. Our different results argue that vestibular signals are necessary for computing errors in VOR gain in the monkey. The species difference may reflect the additional role that smooth pursuit eye movements play in stabilizing gaze during head turns in monkeys.

AB - 1. Adaptive changes were induced in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) of monkeys by oscillating them while they viewed the visual scene through optical devices ('spectacles') that required changes in the amplitude of eye movement during head turns. The 'gain' of the VOR (eye velocity divided by head velocity) during sinusoidal oscillation in darkness underwent gradual changes that were appropriate to reduce the motion of images on the retina during the adapting procedures. 2. Bilateral ablation of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus caused a complete and enduring loss of the ability to undergo adaptive changes in the VOR. Partial lesions caused a substantial but incomplete loss of the adaptive capability. We conclude that the flocculus is necessary for adaptive changes in the monkey's VOR. 3. Further experiments in normal animals determined the types of stimuli that were necessary and/or sufficient to cause changes in VOR gain. 4. Full-field visual stimulation was not necessary to induce adaptive changes in the VOR. Monkeys tracked a small spot in the conditions that elicited the same combination of eye and head movements seen during passive oscillation with spectacles. The gain of the VOR showed changes 50-70% as large as those produced by the same duration of oscillation with spectacles. Since the effective tracking conditions cause a consistent correlation of floccular output with vestibular inputs, these data are compatible with our previous suggestion (20) that the flocculus may provide signals used by the central nervous system to compute errors in the gain of the VOR. 5. Prolonged sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation with the head stationary caused only a slight increase in VOR gain. Left-right reversal of vision and eye movement during sinusoidal vestibular oscillation caused decreases in VOR gain. In rabbits, both of these stimulus conditions produced large increases in the gain of the VOR (3), which implied that eye velocity signals were used instead of vestibular inputs to compute errors in the VOR. Our different results argue that vestibular signals are necessary for computing errors in VOR gain in the monkey. The species difference may reflect the additional role that smooth pursuit eye movements play in stabilizing gaze during head turns in monkeys.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021744354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021744354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6335171

AN - SCOPUS:0021744354

VL - 52

SP - 1140

EP - 1153

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 6

ER -