Shoulder Dystocia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using an evidence-based, medical approach, the strengths and pitfalls of the causation- and standard-of-care-based arguments proffered by plaintiff and defense counsel in shoulder dystocia- associated birth injury litigation are reviewed based on medical plausibility. The role of the expert witness as arbiter of the relationship between medical care rendered and the untoward outcome of such care is distinguished from that of other court members. Proposed solutions to the medical malpractice litigation crisis are also examined in light of relevant differences in the pathogenetic bases for birth injuries of various types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-385
Number of pages21
JournalClinics in Perinatology
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Birth Injuries
Dystocia
Jurisprudence
Malpractice
Expert Testimony
Standard of Care
Causality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Shoulder Dystocia. / Gurewitsch Allen, Edith; Allen, Robert.

In: Clinics in Perinatology, Vol. 34, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 365-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e058aae93fc4eb7a64b7109f0e538e9,
title = "Shoulder Dystocia",
abstract = "Using an evidence-based, medical approach, the strengths and pitfalls of the causation- and standard-of-care-based arguments proffered by plaintiff and defense counsel in shoulder dystocia- associated birth injury litigation are reviewed based on medical plausibility. The role of the expert witness as arbiter of the relationship between medical care rendered and the untoward outcome of such care is distinguished from that of other court members. Proposed solutions to the medical malpractice litigation crisis are also examined in light of relevant differences in the pathogenetic bases for birth injuries of various types.",
author = "{Gurewitsch Allen}, Edith and Robert Allen",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.clp.2007.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "365--385",
journal = "Clinics in Perinatology",
issn = "0095-5108",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shoulder Dystocia

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith

AU - Allen, Robert

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Using an evidence-based, medical approach, the strengths and pitfalls of the causation- and standard-of-care-based arguments proffered by plaintiff and defense counsel in shoulder dystocia- associated birth injury litigation are reviewed based on medical plausibility. The role of the expert witness as arbiter of the relationship between medical care rendered and the untoward outcome of such care is distinguished from that of other court members. Proposed solutions to the medical malpractice litigation crisis are also examined in light of relevant differences in the pathogenetic bases for birth injuries of various types.

AB - Using an evidence-based, medical approach, the strengths and pitfalls of the causation- and standard-of-care-based arguments proffered by plaintiff and defense counsel in shoulder dystocia- associated birth injury litigation are reviewed based on medical plausibility. The role of the expert witness as arbiter of the relationship between medical care rendered and the untoward outcome of such care is distinguished from that of other court members. Proposed solutions to the medical malpractice litigation crisis are also examined in light of relevant differences in the pathogenetic bases for birth injuries of various types.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548297619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548297619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clp.2007.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.clp.2007.04.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17765488

AN - SCOPUS:34548297619

VL - 34

SP - 365

EP - 385

JO - Clinics in Perinatology

JF - Clinics in Perinatology

SN - 0095-5108

IS - 3

ER -