Should male circumcision be advocated for genital cancer prevention

Brian J. Morris, Adrian Mindel, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Catherine A. Hankins, Ronald H. Gray, Robert C. Bailey, Xavier Bosch, Alex D. Wodak

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


The recent policy statement by the Cancer Council of Australia on infant circumcision and cancer prevention and the announcement that the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine will be made available for boys in Australia prompted us to provide an assessment of genital cancer prevention. While HPV vaccination of boys should help reduce anal cancer in homosexual men and cervical cancer in women, it will have little or no impact on penile or prostate cancer. Male circumcision can reduce cervical, penile and possibly prostate cancer. Promotion of both HPV vaccination and male circumcision will synergistically maximize genital cancer prevention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4839-4842
Number of pages4
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2012


  • Cancer
  • Infectious diseases
  • Men's health
  • Public health
  • Sexual health
  • Urology
  • Women's health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cancer Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Should male circumcision be advocated for genital cancer prevention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this