Should Euthanasia Be Considered Iatrogenic?

Silvana Barone, Yoram Unguru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As more countries adopt laws and regulations concerning euthanasia, pediatric euthanasia has become an important topic of discussion. Conceptions of what constitutes harm to patients are fluid and highly dependent on a myriad of factors including, but not limited to, health care ethics, family values, and cultural context. Euthanasia could be viewed as iatrogenic insofar as it results in an outcome (death) that some might consider inherently negative. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that death, the outcome of euthanasia, is not an inadvertent or preventable complication but rather the goal of the medical intervention. Conversely, the refusal to engage in the practice of euthanasia might be conceived as iatrogenic insofar as it might inadvertently prolong patient suffering. This article will explore cultural and social factors informing families', health care professionals', and society's views on pediatric euthanasia in selected countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)802-814
Number of pages13
JournalAMA journal of ethics
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Euthanasia
Pediatrics
Patient Harm
Bioethics
Family Health
Psychological Stress
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Should Euthanasia Be Considered Iatrogenic? / Barone, Silvana; Unguru, Yoram.

In: AMA journal of ethics, Vol. 19, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 802-814.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barone, Silvana ; Unguru, Yoram. / Should Euthanasia Be Considered Iatrogenic?. In: AMA journal of ethics. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 8. pp. 802-814.
@article{498629b80b154c049b17972070d530de,
title = "Should Euthanasia Be Considered Iatrogenic?",
abstract = "As more countries adopt laws and regulations concerning euthanasia, pediatric euthanasia has become an important topic of discussion. Conceptions of what constitutes harm to patients are fluid and highly dependent on a myriad of factors including, but not limited to, health care ethics, family values, and cultural context. Euthanasia could be viewed as iatrogenic insofar as it results in an outcome (death) that some might consider inherently negative. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that death, the outcome of euthanasia, is not an inadvertent or preventable complication but rather the goal of the medical intervention. Conversely, the refusal to engage in the practice of euthanasia might be conceived as iatrogenic insofar as it might inadvertently prolong patient suffering. This article will explore cultural and social factors informing families', health care professionals', and society's views on pediatric euthanasia in selected countries.",
author = "Silvana Barone and Yoram Unguru",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.msoc1-1708",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "802--814",
journal = "AMA journal of ethics",
issn = "2376-6980",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should Euthanasia Be Considered Iatrogenic?

AU - Barone, Silvana

AU - Unguru, Yoram

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - As more countries adopt laws and regulations concerning euthanasia, pediatric euthanasia has become an important topic of discussion. Conceptions of what constitutes harm to patients are fluid and highly dependent on a myriad of factors including, but not limited to, health care ethics, family values, and cultural context. Euthanasia could be viewed as iatrogenic insofar as it results in an outcome (death) that some might consider inherently negative. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that death, the outcome of euthanasia, is not an inadvertent or preventable complication but rather the goal of the medical intervention. Conversely, the refusal to engage in the practice of euthanasia might be conceived as iatrogenic insofar as it might inadvertently prolong patient suffering. This article will explore cultural and social factors informing families', health care professionals', and society's views on pediatric euthanasia in selected countries.

AB - As more countries adopt laws and regulations concerning euthanasia, pediatric euthanasia has become an important topic of discussion. Conceptions of what constitutes harm to patients are fluid and highly dependent on a myriad of factors including, but not limited to, health care ethics, family values, and cultural context. Euthanasia could be viewed as iatrogenic insofar as it results in an outcome (death) that some might consider inherently negative. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that death, the outcome of euthanasia, is not an inadvertent or preventable complication but rather the goal of the medical intervention. Conversely, the refusal to engage in the practice of euthanasia might be conceived as iatrogenic insofar as it might inadvertently prolong patient suffering. This article will explore cultural and social factors informing families', health care professionals', and society's views on pediatric euthanasia in selected countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041678748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041678748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.msoc1-1708

DO - 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.msoc1-1708

M3 - Article

C2 - 28846520

AN - SCOPUS:85041678748

VL - 19

SP - 802

EP - 814

JO - AMA journal of ethics

JF - AMA journal of ethics

SN - 2376-6980

IS - 8

ER -