Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department

Ana Castaneda-Guarderas, Jeffrey Glassberg, Corita R. Grudzen, Ka Ming Ngai, Margaret E. Samuels-Kalow, Erica Shelton, Stephen P. Wall, Lynne D. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The emergency department (ED) occupies a unique position within the healthcare system, serving as a safety net for vulnerable patients, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, country of origin, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or medical diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) presents special challenges when used with vulnerable population groups. The differing circumstances, needs, and perspectives of vulnerable groups invoke issues of provider bias, disrespect, judgmental attitudes, and lack of cultural competence, as well as patient mistrust and the consequences of their social and economic disenfranchisement. A research agenda that includes community-engaged approaches, mixed-methods studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses is proposed to address the following questions: 1) What are the best processes/formats for SDM among racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, linguistic, social, or otherwise vulnerable groups who experience disadvantage in the healthcare system? 2) What organizational or systemic changes are needed to support SDM in the ED whenever appropriate? 3) What competencies are needed to enable emergency providers to consider patients’ situation/context in an unbiased way? 4) How do we teach these competencies to students and residents? 5) How do we cultivate these competencies in practicing emergency physicians, nurses, and other clinical providers who lack them? The authors also identify the importance of using accurate, group-specific data to inform risk estimates for SDM decision aids for vulnerable populations and the need for increased ED-based care coordination and transitional care management capabilities to create additional care options that align with the needs and preferences of vulnerable populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1410-1416
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume23
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Hospital Emergency Service
Decision Making
Emergencies
Cultural Competency
Delivery of Health Care
Decision Support Techniques
Religion
Linguistics
Population Groups
Social Class
Sexual Behavior
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Nurses
Economics
Students
Physicians
Safety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Castaneda-Guarderas, A., Glassberg, J., Grudzen, C. R., Ngai, K. M., Samuels-Kalow, M. E., Shelton, E., ... Richardson, L. D. (2016). Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 23(12), 1410-1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13134

Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department. / Castaneda-Guarderas, Ana; Glassberg, Jeffrey; Grudzen, Corita R.; Ngai, Ka Ming; Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E.; Shelton, Erica; Wall, Stephen P.; Richardson, Lynne D.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 12, 01.12.2016, p. 1410-1416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castaneda-Guarderas, A, Glassberg, J, Grudzen, CR, Ngai, KM, Samuels-Kalow, ME, Shelton, E, Wall, SP & Richardson, LD 2016, 'Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1410-1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13134
Castaneda-Guarderas A, Glassberg J, Grudzen CR, Ngai KM, Samuels-Kalow ME, Shelton E et al. Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 Dec 1;23(12):1410-1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13134
Castaneda-Guarderas, Ana ; Glassberg, Jeffrey ; Grudzen, Corita R. ; Ngai, Ka Ming ; Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E. ; Shelton, Erica ; Wall, Stephen P. ; Richardson, Lynne D. / Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 12. pp. 1410-1416.
@article{95e58045613b487c8fd8b7f190e4d1d7,
title = "Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department",
abstract = "The emergency department (ED) occupies a unique position within the healthcare system, serving as a safety net for vulnerable patients, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, country of origin, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or medical diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) presents special challenges when used with vulnerable population groups. The differing circumstances, needs, and perspectives of vulnerable groups invoke issues of provider bias, disrespect, judgmental attitudes, and lack of cultural competence, as well as patient mistrust and the consequences of their social and economic disenfranchisement. A research agenda that includes community-engaged approaches, mixed-methods studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses is proposed to address the following questions: 1) What are the best processes/formats for SDM among racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, linguistic, social, or otherwise vulnerable groups who experience disadvantage in the healthcare system? 2) What organizational or systemic changes are needed to support SDM in the ED whenever appropriate? 3) What competencies are needed to enable emergency providers to consider patients’ situation/context in an unbiased way? 4) How do we teach these competencies to students and residents? 5) How do we cultivate these competencies in practicing emergency physicians, nurses, and other clinical providers who lack them? The authors also identify the importance of using accurate, group-specific data to inform risk estimates for SDM decision aids for vulnerable populations and the need for increased ED-based care coordination and transitional care management capabilities to create additional care options that align with the needs and preferences of vulnerable populations.",
author = "Ana Castaneda-Guarderas and Jeffrey Glassberg and Grudzen, {Corita R.} and Ngai, {Ka Ming} and Samuels-Kalow, {Margaret E.} and Erica Shelton and Wall, {Stephen P.} and Richardson, {Lynne D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acem.13134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1410--1416",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared Decision Making With Vulnerable Populations in the Emergency Department

AU - Castaneda-Guarderas, Ana

AU - Glassberg, Jeffrey

AU - Grudzen, Corita R.

AU - Ngai, Ka Ming

AU - Samuels-Kalow, Margaret E.

AU - Shelton, Erica

AU - Wall, Stephen P.

AU - Richardson, Lynne D.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The emergency department (ED) occupies a unique position within the healthcare system, serving as a safety net for vulnerable patients, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, country of origin, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or medical diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) presents special challenges when used with vulnerable population groups. The differing circumstances, needs, and perspectives of vulnerable groups invoke issues of provider bias, disrespect, judgmental attitudes, and lack of cultural competence, as well as patient mistrust and the consequences of their social and economic disenfranchisement. A research agenda that includes community-engaged approaches, mixed-methods studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses is proposed to address the following questions: 1) What are the best processes/formats for SDM among racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, linguistic, social, or otherwise vulnerable groups who experience disadvantage in the healthcare system? 2) What organizational or systemic changes are needed to support SDM in the ED whenever appropriate? 3) What competencies are needed to enable emergency providers to consider patients’ situation/context in an unbiased way? 4) How do we teach these competencies to students and residents? 5) How do we cultivate these competencies in practicing emergency physicians, nurses, and other clinical providers who lack them? The authors also identify the importance of using accurate, group-specific data to inform risk estimates for SDM decision aids for vulnerable populations and the need for increased ED-based care coordination and transitional care management capabilities to create additional care options that align with the needs and preferences of vulnerable populations.

AB - The emergency department (ED) occupies a unique position within the healthcare system, serving as a safety net for vulnerable patients, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, country of origin, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or medical diagnosis. Shared decision making (SDM) presents special challenges when used with vulnerable population groups. The differing circumstances, needs, and perspectives of vulnerable groups invoke issues of provider bias, disrespect, judgmental attitudes, and lack of cultural competence, as well as patient mistrust and the consequences of their social and economic disenfranchisement. A research agenda that includes community-engaged approaches, mixed-methods studies, and cost-effectiveness analyses is proposed to address the following questions: 1) What are the best processes/formats for SDM among racial, ethnic, cultural, religious, linguistic, social, or otherwise vulnerable groups who experience disadvantage in the healthcare system? 2) What organizational or systemic changes are needed to support SDM in the ED whenever appropriate? 3) What competencies are needed to enable emergency providers to consider patients’ situation/context in an unbiased way? 4) How do we teach these competencies to students and residents? 5) How do we cultivate these competencies in practicing emergency physicians, nurses, and other clinical providers who lack them? The authors also identify the importance of using accurate, group-specific data to inform risk estimates for SDM decision aids for vulnerable populations and the need for increased ED-based care coordination and transitional care management capabilities to create additional care options that align with the needs and preferences of vulnerable populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001955827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85001955827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acem.13134

DO - 10.1111/acem.13134

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1410

EP - 1416

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -