Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Michael Saheb Kashaf, Elizabeth Tyner McGill, Zackary Berger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease which necessitates the development of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider. This review systematically examines the association between treatment shared decision-making (SDM) and outcomes in diabetes. Methods: A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. Included studies were subjected to dual data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes were synthesized using meta-analyses where reporting was sufficiently homogenous or alternatively synthesized in narrative fashion. Results: The search retrieved 4592 records, which were screened by title, abstract, and full text to identify 16 studies with a range of study designs and populations. We found evidence of an association between SDM and improved decision quality, patient knowledge and patient risk perception. We found little evidence of an association between SDM and glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life, medication adherence or trust in physician. Conclusions: This work elucidates the potential clinical utility of SDM interventions in the management of Type 2 Diabetes and helps inform future research on the topic. Practice implications: A more complete understanding of the associations between SDM and outcomes will guide and motivate efforts aimed at improving uptake of the SDM paradigm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Meta-Analysis
Decision Making
Bibliographic Databases
Medication Adherence
Patient Satisfaction
Chronic Disease
Quality of Life
Physicians
Therapeutics
Population

Keywords

  • Outcomes research
  • Patient-centered care
  • Shared decision-making
  • Type II diabetes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Saheb Kashaf, Michael; McGill, Elizabeth Tyner; Berger, Zackary.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb958faef35a476b95fbe67eabfeb14d,
title = "Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease which necessitates the development of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider. This review systematically examines the association between treatment shared decision-making (SDM) and outcomes in diabetes. Methods: A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. Included studies were subjected to dual data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes were synthesized using meta-analyses where reporting was sufficiently homogenous or alternatively synthesized in narrative fashion. Results: The search retrieved 4592 records, which were screened by title, abstract, and full text to identify 16 studies with a range of study designs and populations. We found evidence of an association between SDM and improved decision quality, patient knowledge and patient risk perception. We found little evidence of an association between SDM and glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life, medication adherence or trust in physician. Conclusions: This work elucidates the potential clinical utility of SDM interventions in the management of Type 2 Diabetes and helps inform future research on the topic. Practice implications: A more complete understanding of the associations between SDM and outcomes will guide and motivate efforts aimed at improving uptake of the SDM paradigm.",
keywords = "Outcomes research, Patient-centered care, Shared decision-making, Type II diabetes",
author = "{Saheb Kashaf}, Michael and McGill, {Elizabeth Tyner} and Zackary Berger",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.030",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Saheb Kashaf, Michael

AU - McGill, Elizabeth Tyner

AU - Berger, Zackary

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objective: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease which necessitates the development of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider. This review systematically examines the association between treatment shared decision-making (SDM) and outcomes in diabetes. Methods: A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. Included studies were subjected to dual data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes were synthesized using meta-analyses where reporting was sufficiently homogenous or alternatively synthesized in narrative fashion. Results: The search retrieved 4592 records, which were screened by title, abstract, and full text to identify 16 studies with a range of study designs and populations. We found evidence of an association between SDM and improved decision quality, patient knowledge and patient risk perception. We found little evidence of an association between SDM and glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life, medication adherence or trust in physician. Conclusions: This work elucidates the potential clinical utility of SDM interventions in the management of Type 2 Diabetes and helps inform future research on the topic. Practice implications: A more complete understanding of the associations between SDM and outcomes will guide and motivate efforts aimed at improving uptake of the SDM paradigm.

AB - Objective: Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease which necessitates the development of a therapeutic alliance between patient and provider. This review systematically examines the association between treatment shared decision-making (SDM) and outcomes in diabetes. Methods: A range of bibliographic databases and gray literature sources was searched. Included studies were subjected to dual data extraction and quality assessment. Outcomes were synthesized using meta-analyses where reporting was sufficiently homogenous or alternatively synthesized in narrative fashion. Results: The search retrieved 4592 records, which were screened by title, abstract, and full text to identify 16 studies with a range of study designs and populations. We found evidence of an association between SDM and improved decision quality, patient knowledge and patient risk perception. We found little evidence of an association between SDM and glycemic control, patient satisfaction, quality of life, medication adherence or trust in physician. Conclusions: This work elucidates the potential clinical utility of SDM interventions in the management of Type 2 Diabetes and helps inform future research on the topic. Practice implications: A more complete understanding of the associations between SDM and outcomes will guide and motivate efforts aimed at improving uptake of the SDM paradigm.

KW - Outcomes research

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Shared decision-making

KW - Type II diabetes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022068934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85022068934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.030

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 28693922

AN - SCOPUS:85022068934

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

ER -