Setting the global research agenda for community health systems: Literature and consultative review

Smisha Kaysin, Karen Kirk, Pooja Sripad, Ben Bellows, Timothy Abuya, Charlotte Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Globally, there is renewed interest in and momentum for strengthening community health systems, as also emphasized by the recent Astana Declaration. Recent reviews have identified factors critical to successful community health worker (CHW) programs but pointed to significant evidence gaps. This review aims to propose a global research agenda to strengthen CHW programs. Methods and results: We conducted a search for extant systematic reviews on any intermediate factors affecting the effectiveness of CHW programs in February 2018. A total of 30 articles published after year 2000 were included. Data on research gaps were abstracted and summarized under headings based on predominant themes identified in the literature. Following this data gathering phase, two technical advisory groups comprised of experts in the field of community health - including policymakers, implementors, researchers, advocates and donors - were convened to discuss, validate, and prioritize the research gaps identified. Research gap areas that were identified in the literature and validated through expert consultation include selection and training of CHWs, community embeddedness, institutionalization of CHW programs (referrals, supervision, and supply chain), CHW needs including incentives and remuneration, governance and sustainability of CHW programs, performance and quality of care, and cost-effectiveness of CHW programs. Priority research questions included queries on effective policy, financing, governance, supervision and monitoring systems for CHWs and community health systems, implementation questions around the role of digital technologies, CHW preferences, and drivers of CHW motivation and retention over time. Conclusions: As international interest and investment in CHW programs and community health systems continue to grow, it becomes critical not only to analyze the evidence that exists, but also to clearly define research questions and collect additional evidence to ensure that CHW programs are effective, efficient, equity promoting, and evidence based. Generally, the literature places a strong emphasis on the need for higher quality, more robust research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number22
JournalHuman Resources for Health
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 21 2019

Fingerprint

Community Health Planning
health
Research
community
worker
Motivation
literature
Referral and Consultation
Remuneration
Institutionalization
supervision
evidence
Quality of Health Care
expert
governance
Cost-Benefit Analysis
financial management

Keywords

  • Community health systems
  • Community health workers
  • Frontline health workers
  • Literature review
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Setting the global research agenda for community health systems : Literature and consultative review. / Kaysin, Smisha; Kirk, Karen; Sripad, Pooja; Bellows, Ben; Abuya, Timothy; Warren, Charlotte.

In: Human Resources for Health, Vol. 17, No. 1, 22, 21.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Kaysin, Smisha ; Kirk, Karen ; Sripad, Pooja ; Bellows, Ben ; Abuya, Timothy ; Warren, Charlotte. / Setting the global research agenda for community health systems : Literature and consultative review. In: Human Resources for Health. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 1.
@article{3a702e176f9347199d8c491cf7155788,
title = "Setting the global research agenda for community health systems: Literature and consultative review",
abstract = "Background: Globally, there is renewed interest in and momentum for strengthening community health systems, as also emphasized by the recent Astana Declaration. Recent reviews have identified factors critical to successful community health worker (CHW) programs but pointed to significant evidence gaps. This review aims to propose a global research agenda to strengthen CHW programs. Methods and results: We conducted a search for extant systematic reviews on any intermediate factors affecting the effectiveness of CHW programs in February 2018. A total of 30 articles published after year 2000 were included. Data on research gaps were abstracted and summarized under headings based on predominant themes identified in the literature. Following this data gathering phase, two technical advisory groups comprised of experts in the field of community health - including policymakers, implementors, researchers, advocates and donors - were convened to discuss, validate, and prioritize the research gaps identified. Research gap areas that were identified in the literature and validated through expert consultation include selection and training of CHWs, community embeddedness, institutionalization of CHW programs (referrals, supervision, and supply chain), CHW needs including incentives and remuneration, governance and sustainability of CHW programs, performance and quality of care, and cost-effectiveness of CHW programs. Priority research questions included queries on effective policy, financing, governance, supervision and monitoring systems for CHWs and community health systems, implementation questions around the role of digital technologies, CHW preferences, and drivers of CHW motivation and retention over time. Conclusions: As international interest and investment in CHW programs and community health systems continue to grow, it becomes critical not only to analyze the evidence that exists, but also to clearly define research questions and collect additional evidence to ensure that CHW programs are effective, efficient, equity promoting, and evidence based. Generally, the literature places a strong emphasis on the need for higher quality, more robust research.",
keywords = "Community health systems, Community health workers, Frontline health workers, Literature review, Primary health care",
author = "Smisha Kaysin and Karen Kirk and Pooja Sripad and Ben Bellows and Timothy Abuya and Charlotte Warren",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s12960-019-0362-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Human Resources for Health",
issn = "1478-4491",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting the global research agenda for community health systems

T2 - Literature and consultative review

AU - Kaysin, Smisha

AU - Kirk, Karen

AU - Sripad, Pooja

AU - Bellows, Ben

AU - Abuya, Timothy

AU - Warren, Charlotte

PY - 2019/3/21

Y1 - 2019/3/21

N2 - Background: Globally, there is renewed interest in and momentum for strengthening community health systems, as also emphasized by the recent Astana Declaration. Recent reviews have identified factors critical to successful community health worker (CHW) programs but pointed to significant evidence gaps. This review aims to propose a global research agenda to strengthen CHW programs. Methods and results: We conducted a search for extant systematic reviews on any intermediate factors affecting the effectiveness of CHW programs in February 2018. A total of 30 articles published after year 2000 were included. Data on research gaps were abstracted and summarized under headings based on predominant themes identified in the literature. Following this data gathering phase, two technical advisory groups comprised of experts in the field of community health - including policymakers, implementors, researchers, advocates and donors - were convened to discuss, validate, and prioritize the research gaps identified. Research gap areas that were identified in the literature and validated through expert consultation include selection and training of CHWs, community embeddedness, institutionalization of CHW programs (referrals, supervision, and supply chain), CHW needs including incentives and remuneration, governance and sustainability of CHW programs, performance and quality of care, and cost-effectiveness of CHW programs. Priority research questions included queries on effective policy, financing, governance, supervision and monitoring systems for CHWs and community health systems, implementation questions around the role of digital technologies, CHW preferences, and drivers of CHW motivation and retention over time. Conclusions: As international interest and investment in CHW programs and community health systems continue to grow, it becomes critical not only to analyze the evidence that exists, but also to clearly define research questions and collect additional evidence to ensure that CHW programs are effective, efficient, equity promoting, and evidence based. Generally, the literature places a strong emphasis on the need for higher quality, more robust research.

AB - Background: Globally, there is renewed interest in and momentum for strengthening community health systems, as also emphasized by the recent Astana Declaration. Recent reviews have identified factors critical to successful community health worker (CHW) programs but pointed to significant evidence gaps. This review aims to propose a global research agenda to strengthen CHW programs. Methods and results: We conducted a search for extant systematic reviews on any intermediate factors affecting the effectiveness of CHW programs in February 2018. A total of 30 articles published after year 2000 were included. Data on research gaps were abstracted and summarized under headings based on predominant themes identified in the literature. Following this data gathering phase, two technical advisory groups comprised of experts in the field of community health - including policymakers, implementors, researchers, advocates and donors - were convened to discuss, validate, and prioritize the research gaps identified. Research gap areas that were identified in the literature and validated through expert consultation include selection and training of CHWs, community embeddedness, institutionalization of CHW programs (referrals, supervision, and supply chain), CHW needs including incentives and remuneration, governance and sustainability of CHW programs, performance and quality of care, and cost-effectiveness of CHW programs. Priority research questions included queries on effective policy, financing, governance, supervision and monitoring systems for CHWs and community health systems, implementation questions around the role of digital technologies, CHW preferences, and drivers of CHW motivation and retention over time. Conclusions: As international interest and investment in CHW programs and community health systems continue to grow, it becomes critical not only to analyze the evidence that exists, but also to clearly define research questions and collect additional evidence to ensure that CHW programs are effective, efficient, equity promoting, and evidence based. Generally, the literature places a strong emphasis on the need for higher quality, more robust research.

KW - Community health systems

KW - Community health workers

KW - Frontline health workers

KW - Literature review

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063367009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063367009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12960-019-0362-8

DO - 10.1186/s12960-019-0362-8

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30898136

AN - SCOPUS:85063367009

VL - 17

JO - Human Resources for Health

JF - Human Resources for Health

SN - 1478-4491

IS - 1

M1 - 22

ER -