Abstract
Objective: To determine whether ERP components can differentiate between the semantic priming mechanisms of automatic spreading activation, expectancy, and semantic matching. Methods: The present study manipulated two factors known to differentiate semantic priming mechanisms: associations between words (forward, backward, and symmetrical) and prime-target stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). Twenty-six participants were tested in each SOA condition while high-density 128-channel data were collected. Principal components analysis was applied to separate the ERP components. Results: Priming was observed for all conditions. Three semantic components were present: (1) the standard N400 effect for symmetric and forward priming pairs at both short and long SOAs, (2) an N300 for the long SOA symmetric priming pairs, and (3) a right-lateralized posterior N400RP for long SOA backward priming pairs. Conclusions: Results suggest that the N300 reflects expectancy, but only for categorical and/or semantic similarity priming. Results further suggest that the N400RP is a replicable ERP component that responds to semantic matching. There is also some evidence that the N400 indirectly responds to both ASA and expectancy, perhaps as part of a post-lexical updating process and that backward priming at short SOAs is different from that at long SOAs. Significance: Improved understanding of the semantic properties of the N400 and related ERP components may increase their utility for understanding language processes and for diagnostic purposes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1053-1068 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Clinical Neurophysiology |
Volume | 118 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 1 2007 |
Keywords
- Attention
- Event related potential (ERP)
- N400
- Semantic priming
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sensory Systems
- Neurology
- Clinical Neurology
- Physiology (medical)