Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma

Andrew McLaughlin, Marcus H. Colyer, Denise S. Ryan, Rose K. Sia, Eric D. Weichel, Andrew Spiegelman, S. G. Eaddy, Robert A. Mazzoli, Kraig Bower

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the visual outlook and quality of life of service members after combat ocular trauma. Methods: In a single-center, prospective observational study of service members sustaining ocular trauma, participants underwent a series of ocular examinations and noninvasive tests, including the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Results: Of the 165 enrolled participants, 137 completed the VFQ-25. The mean VFQ-25 composite score was 74.4 ± 20.7 (range: 1.4–100). Among 118 participants with visual acuity assessment, 92% had best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better in at least one eye. Among participants with severe vision loss (BCVA ≤20/200), there was no statistically significant difference in self-reported general health compared to those without severe vision loss (p = 0.17). However, there was a significantly lower visual quality of life reported in the composite score and all of the 11 subscales of the VFQ-25. Conclusions: While this study provides evidence that combat ocular trauma is associated with a lower visual quality of life, limitations include the relatively small sample size and the limited documentation of the use of eye protection at time of injury among participants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number239
Pages (from-to)239-242
Number of pages4
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume182
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Wounds and Injuries
Visual Acuity
National Eye Institute (U.S.)
Documentation
Sample Size
Observational Studies
Prospective Studies
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

McLaughlin, A., Colyer, M. H., Ryan, D. S., Sia, R. K., Weichel, E. D., Spiegelman, A., ... Bower, K. (2017). Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma. Military Medicine, 182, 239-242. [239]. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00139

Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma. / McLaughlin, Andrew; Colyer, Marcus H.; Ryan, Denise S.; Sia, Rose K.; Weichel, Eric D.; Spiegelman, Andrew; Eaddy, S. G.; Mazzoli, Robert A.; Bower, Kraig.

In: Military Medicine, Vol. 182, 239, 01.03.2017, p. 239-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McLaughlin, A, Colyer, MH, Ryan, DS, Sia, RK, Weichel, ED, Spiegelman, A, Eaddy, SG, Mazzoli, RA & Bower, K 2017, 'Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma', Military Medicine, vol. 182, 239, pp. 239-242. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00139
McLaughlin A, Colyer MH, Ryan DS, Sia RK, Weichel ED, Spiegelman A et al. Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma. Military Medicine. 2017 Mar 1;182:239-242. 239. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00139
McLaughlin, Andrew ; Colyer, Marcus H. ; Ryan, Denise S. ; Sia, Rose K. ; Weichel, Eric D. ; Spiegelman, Andrew ; Eaddy, S. G. ; Mazzoli, Robert A. ; Bower, Kraig. / Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma. In: Military Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 182. pp. 239-242.
@article{e833a998c2254244a98454bf3fbb23e7,
title = "Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma",
abstract = "Objectives: To describe the visual outlook and quality of life of service members after combat ocular trauma. Methods: In a single-center, prospective observational study of service members sustaining ocular trauma, participants underwent a series of ocular examinations and noninvasive tests, including the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Results: Of the 165 enrolled participants, 137 completed the VFQ-25. The mean VFQ-25 composite score was 74.4 ± 20.7 (range: 1.4–100). Among 118 participants with visual acuity assessment, 92{\%} had best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better in at least one eye. Among participants with severe vision loss (BCVA ≤20/200), there was no statistically significant difference in self-reported general health compared to those without severe vision loss (p = 0.17). However, there was a significantly lower visual quality of life reported in the composite score and all of the 11 subscales of the VFQ-25. Conclusions: While this study provides evidence that combat ocular trauma is associated with a lower visual quality of life, limitations include the relatively small sample size and the limited documentation of the use of eye protection at time of injury among participants.",
author = "Andrew McLaughlin and Colyer, {Marcus H.} and Ryan, {Denise S.} and Sia, {Rose K.} and Weichel, {Eric D.} and Andrew Spiegelman and Eaddy, {S. G.} and Mazzoli, {Robert A.} and Kraig Bower",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00139",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "182",
pages = "239--242",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-reported visual quality of life after combat ocular trauma

AU - McLaughlin, Andrew

AU - Colyer, Marcus H.

AU - Ryan, Denise S.

AU - Sia, Rose K.

AU - Weichel, Eric D.

AU - Spiegelman, Andrew

AU - Eaddy, S. G.

AU - Mazzoli, Robert A.

AU - Bower, Kraig

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objectives: To describe the visual outlook and quality of life of service members after combat ocular trauma. Methods: In a single-center, prospective observational study of service members sustaining ocular trauma, participants underwent a series of ocular examinations and noninvasive tests, including the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Results: Of the 165 enrolled participants, 137 completed the VFQ-25. The mean VFQ-25 composite score was 74.4 ± 20.7 (range: 1.4–100). Among 118 participants with visual acuity assessment, 92% had best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better in at least one eye. Among participants with severe vision loss (BCVA ≤20/200), there was no statistically significant difference in self-reported general health compared to those without severe vision loss (p = 0.17). However, there was a significantly lower visual quality of life reported in the composite score and all of the 11 subscales of the VFQ-25. Conclusions: While this study provides evidence that combat ocular trauma is associated with a lower visual quality of life, limitations include the relatively small sample size and the limited documentation of the use of eye protection at time of injury among participants.

AB - Objectives: To describe the visual outlook and quality of life of service members after combat ocular trauma. Methods: In a single-center, prospective observational study of service members sustaining ocular trauma, participants underwent a series of ocular examinations and noninvasive tests, including the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Results: Of the 165 enrolled participants, 137 completed the VFQ-25. The mean VFQ-25 composite score was 74.4 ± 20.7 (range: 1.4–100). Among 118 participants with visual acuity assessment, 92% had best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better in at least one eye. Among participants with severe vision loss (BCVA ≤20/200), there was no statistically significant difference in self-reported general health compared to those without severe vision loss (p = 0.17). However, there was a significantly lower visual quality of life reported in the composite score and all of the 11 subscales of the VFQ-25. Conclusions: While this study provides evidence that combat ocular trauma is associated with a lower visual quality of life, limitations include the relatively small sample size and the limited documentation of the use of eye protection at time of injury among participants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015192185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015192185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00139

DO - 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00139

M3 - Article

C2 - 28291481

AN - SCOPUS:85015192185

VL - 182

SP - 239

EP - 242

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

M1 - 239

ER -