TY - JOUR
T1 - Selection bias in prenatal care utilization
T2 - An interdisciplinary framework and review of the literature
AU - Frick, Kevin D.
AU - Lantz, Paula M.
PY - 1996/12
Y1 - 1996/12
N2 - Since there are no randomized trials of standard prenatal care, it is difficult to assess its impact on birth outcomes without controlling for selection processes that can inhibit or promote its use. In this article, we develop a typology of selection processes in prenatal care utilization, identifying four distinct types of selection and their possible biasing effects on estimates of prenatal care efficacy. Second, using an interdisciplinary framework, we review the published studies on birth outcomes that consider selectivity in prenatal care, all of which have been published in the economics literature. The results from these studies suggest that selectivity in the use of care does exist and that the predominant process is one of adverse selection. This implies that analyses failing to control for selection will underestimate the effects of prenatal care. Third, we discuss the public health policy implications of these findings and offer an agenda for future research.
AB - Since there are no randomized trials of standard prenatal care, it is difficult to assess its impact on birth outcomes without controlling for selection processes that can inhibit or promote its use. In this article, we develop a typology of selection processes in prenatal care utilization, identifying four distinct types of selection and their possible biasing effects on estimates of prenatal care efficacy. Second, using an interdisciplinary framework, we review the published studies on birth outcomes that consider selectivity in prenatal care, all of which have been published in the economics literature. The results from these studies suggest that selectivity in the use of care does exist and that the predominant process is one of adverse selection. This implies that analyses failing to control for selection will underestimate the effects of prenatal care. Third, we discuss the public health policy implications of these findings and offer an agenda for future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030338159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030338159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/107755879605300401
DO - 10.1177/107755879605300401
M3 - Review article
C2 - 10162957
AN - SCOPUS:0030338159
SN - 1077-5587
VL - 53
SP - 371
EP - 396
JO - Medical Care Research and Review
JF - Medical Care Research and Review
IS - 4
ER -