Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series

Yi Zhang, Hye Young Heo, Dong Hoon Lee, Xuna Zhao, Shanshan Jiang, Kai Zhang, Haiyun Li, Jinyuan Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background To compare different reference images selected for registration among chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) series. Materials and Methods Five normal volunteers and eight brain tumor patients were studied on a 3 Tesla scanner. Image registration was performed by choosing each of the acquired CEST saturation or unsaturation dynamic images as the reference. CEST images at 3.5 ppm (amide proton transfer, APT) were computed for each motion-corrected data set after main magnetic field inhomogeneity correction. A uniformity index was defined to quantify the efficacy of image registration using different reference images. Joint histograms and the structural similarity index (SSIM) were used to analyze the intrinsic image similarity between various dynamic images. Results Image registration increased the average uniformity index by 18% if the 3.5 ppm saturated image was selected as the reference image. However, registering to the unsaturated dynamic image reduced the uniformity index by 13% on average. The joint histogram analysis showed that the saturated dynamic images were highly similar (SSIM = 0.89 ± 0.01), and were considerably different from the unsaturated dynamic image (SSIM = 0.58 ± 0.03). Conclusion The selection of the 3.5 ppm dynamic image as the reference image generated the highest uniformity index for APT imaging though other saturated images were equally suited as reference images. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;43:756-761.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)756-761
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Amides
Protons
Joints
Magnetic Fields
Brain Neoplasms
Healthy Volunteers
Datasets

Keywords

  • APT imaging
  • brain tumor
  • CEST imaging
  • image registration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series. / Zhang, Yi; Heo, Hye Young; Lee, Dong Hoon; Zhao, Xuna; Jiang, Shanshan; Zhang, Kai; Li, Haiyun; Zhou, Jinyuan.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 756-761.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, Yi ; Heo, Hye Young ; Lee, Dong Hoon ; Zhao, Xuna ; Jiang, Shanshan ; Zhang, Kai ; Li, Haiyun ; Zhou, Jinyuan. / Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series. In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2016 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 756-761.
@article{c6af6ef5d149488cadf304184f9ceee6,
title = "Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series",
abstract = "Background To compare different reference images selected for registration among chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) series. Materials and Methods Five normal volunteers and eight brain tumor patients were studied on a 3 Tesla scanner. Image registration was performed by choosing each of the acquired CEST saturation or unsaturation dynamic images as the reference. CEST images at 3.5 ppm (amide proton transfer, APT) were computed for each motion-corrected data set after main magnetic field inhomogeneity correction. A uniformity index was defined to quantify the efficacy of image registration using different reference images. Joint histograms and the structural similarity index (SSIM) were used to analyze the intrinsic image similarity between various dynamic images. Results Image registration increased the average uniformity index by 18{\%} if the 3.5 ppm saturated image was selected as the reference image. However, registering to the unsaturated dynamic image reduced the uniformity index by 13{\%} on average. The joint histogram analysis showed that the saturated dynamic images were highly similar (SSIM = 0.89 ± 0.01), and were considerably different from the unsaturated dynamic image (SSIM = 0.58 ± 0.03). Conclusion The selection of the 3.5 ppm dynamic image as the reference image generated the highest uniformity index for APT imaging though other saturated images were equally suited as reference images. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;43:756-761.",
keywords = "APT imaging, brain tumor, CEST imaging, image registration",
author = "Yi Zhang and Heo, {Hye Young} and Lee, {Dong Hoon} and Xuna Zhao and Shanshan Jiang and Kai Zhang and Haiyun Li and Jinyuan Zhou",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.25027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "756--761",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series

AU - Zhang, Yi

AU - Heo, Hye Young

AU - Lee, Dong Hoon

AU - Zhao, Xuna

AU - Jiang, Shanshan

AU - Zhang, Kai

AU - Li, Haiyun

AU - Zhou, Jinyuan

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background To compare different reference images selected for registration among chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) series. Materials and Methods Five normal volunteers and eight brain tumor patients were studied on a 3 Tesla scanner. Image registration was performed by choosing each of the acquired CEST saturation or unsaturation dynamic images as the reference. CEST images at 3.5 ppm (amide proton transfer, APT) were computed for each motion-corrected data set after main magnetic field inhomogeneity correction. A uniformity index was defined to quantify the efficacy of image registration using different reference images. Joint histograms and the structural similarity index (SSIM) were used to analyze the intrinsic image similarity between various dynamic images. Results Image registration increased the average uniformity index by 18% if the 3.5 ppm saturated image was selected as the reference image. However, registering to the unsaturated dynamic image reduced the uniformity index by 13% on average. The joint histogram analysis showed that the saturated dynamic images were highly similar (SSIM = 0.89 ± 0.01), and were considerably different from the unsaturated dynamic image (SSIM = 0.58 ± 0.03). Conclusion The selection of the 3.5 ppm dynamic image as the reference image generated the highest uniformity index for APT imaging though other saturated images were equally suited as reference images. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;43:756-761.

AB - Background To compare different reference images selected for registration among chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) series. Materials and Methods Five normal volunteers and eight brain tumor patients were studied on a 3 Tesla scanner. Image registration was performed by choosing each of the acquired CEST saturation or unsaturation dynamic images as the reference. CEST images at 3.5 ppm (amide proton transfer, APT) were computed for each motion-corrected data set after main magnetic field inhomogeneity correction. A uniformity index was defined to quantify the efficacy of image registration using different reference images. Joint histograms and the structural similarity index (SSIM) were used to analyze the intrinsic image similarity between various dynamic images. Results Image registration increased the average uniformity index by 18% if the 3.5 ppm saturated image was selected as the reference image. However, registering to the unsaturated dynamic image reduced the uniformity index by 13% on average. The joint histogram analysis showed that the saturated dynamic images were highly similar (SSIM = 0.89 ± 0.01), and were considerably different from the unsaturated dynamic image (SSIM = 0.58 ± 0.03). Conclusion The selection of the 3.5 ppm dynamic image as the reference image generated the highest uniformity index for APT imaging though other saturated images were equally suited as reference images. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2016;43:756-761.

KW - APT imaging

KW - brain tumor

KW - CEST imaging

KW - image registration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959551970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959551970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.25027

DO - 10.1002/jmri.25027

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 756

EP - 761

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 3

ER -