Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning

Ryan T. Roemmich, Andrew W. Long, Amy J Bastian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In human motor learning, it is thought that the more information we have about our errors, the faster we learn. Here, we show that additional error information can lead to improved motor performance without any concomitant improvement in learning. We studied split-belt treadmill walking that drives people to learn a new gait pattern using sensory prediction errors detected by proprioceptive feedback. When we also provided visual error feedback, participants acquired the new walking pattern far more rapidly and showed accelerated restoration of the normal walking pattern during washout. However, when the visual error feedback was removed during either learning or washout, errors reappeared with performance immediately returning to the level expected based on proprioceptive learning alone. These findings support a model with two mechanisms: a dual-rate adaptation process that learns invariantly from sensory prediction error detected by proprioception and a visual-feedback-dependent process that monitors learning and corrects residual errors but shows no learning itself. We show that our voluntary correction model accurately predicted behavior in multiple situations where visual feedback was used to change acquisition of new walking patterns while the underlying learning was unaffected. The computational and behavioral framework proposed here suggests that parallel learning and error correction systems allow us to rapidly satisfy task demands without necessarily committing to learning, as the relative permanence of learning may be inappropriate or inefficient when facing environments that are liable to change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2707-2716
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume26
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 24 2016

Fingerprint

learning
Learning
Sensory Feedback
Feedback
walking
Walking
Exercise equipment
proprioception
Error correction
Proprioception
belts (equipment)
prediction
Restoration
exercise equipment
gait
Gait

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • feedback
  • gait
  • locomotion
  • motor learning
  • split-belt treadmill
  • walking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning. / Roemmich, Ryan T.; Long, Andrew W.; Bastian, Amy J.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 26, No. 20, 24.10.2016, p. 2707-2716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roemmich, Ryan T. ; Long, Andrew W. ; Bastian, Amy J. / Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning. In: Current Biology. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 20. pp. 2707-2716.
@article{eac496b4a080438d8e3d8bd1fb4d5d1b,
title = "Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning",
abstract = "In human motor learning, it is thought that the more information we have about our errors, the faster we learn. Here, we show that additional error information can lead to improved motor performance without any concomitant improvement in learning. We studied split-belt treadmill walking that drives people to learn a new gait pattern using sensory prediction errors detected by proprioceptive feedback. When we also provided visual error feedback, participants acquired the new walking pattern far more rapidly and showed accelerated restoration of the normal walking pattern during washout. However, when the visual error feedback was removed during either learning or washout, errors reappeared with performance immediately returning to the level expected based on proprioceptive learning alone. These findings support a model with two mechanisms: a dual-rate adaptation process that learns invariantly from sensory prediction error detected by proprioception and a visual-feedback-dependent process that monitors learning and corrects residual errors but shows no learning itself. We show that our voluntary correction model accurately predicted behavior in multiple situations where visual feedback was used to change acquisition of new walking patterns while the underlying learning was unaffected. The computational and behavioral framework proposed here suggests that parallel learning and error correction systems allow us to rapidly satisfy task demands without necessarily committing to learning, as the relative permanence of learning may be inappropriate or inefficient when facing environments that are liable to change.",
keywords = "adaptation, feedback, gait, locomotion, motor learning, split-belt treadmill, walking",
author = "Roemmich, {Ryan T.} and Long, {Andrew W.} and Bastian, {Amy J}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "2707--2716",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing the Errors You Feel Enhances Locomotor Performance but Not Learning

AU - Roemmich, Ryan T.

AU - Long, Andrew W.

AU - Bastian, Amy J

PY - 2016/10/24

Y1 - 2016/10/24

N2 - In human motor learning, it is thought that the more information we have about our errors, the faster we learn. Here, we show that additional error information can lead to improved motor performance without any concomitant improvement in learning. We studied split-belt treadmill walking that drives people to learn a new gait pattern using sensory prediction errors detected by proprioceptive feedback. When we also provided visual error feedback, participants acquired the new walking pattern far more rapidly and showed accelerated restoration of the normal walking pattern during washout. However, when the visual error feedback was removed during either learning or washout, errors reappeared with performance immediately returning to the level expected based on proprioceptive learning alone. These findings support a model with two mechanisms: a dual-rate adaptation process that learns invariantly from sensory prediction error detected by proprioception and a visual-feedback-dependent process that monitors learning and corrects residual errors but shows no learning itself. We show that our voluntary correction model accurately predicted behavior in multiple situations where visual feedback was used to change acquisition of new walking patterns while the underlying learning was unaffected. The computational and behavioral framework proposed here suggests that parallel learning and error correction systems allow us to rapidly satisfy task demands without necessarily committing to learning, as the relative permanence of learning may be inappropriate or inefficient when facing environments that are liable to change.

AB - In human motor learning, it is thought that the more information we have about our errors, the faster we learn. Here, we show that additional error information can lead to improved motor performance without any concomitant improvement in learning. We studied split-belt treadmill walking that drives people to learn a new gait pattern using sensory prediction errors detected by proprioceptive feedback. When we also provided visual error feedback, participants acquired the new walking pattern far more rapidly and showed accelerated restoration of the normal walking pattern during washout. However, when the visual error feedback was removed during either learning or washout, errors reappeared with performance immediately returning to the level expected based on proprioceptive learning alone. These findings support a model with two mechanisms: a dual-rate adaptation process that learns invariantly from sensory prediction error detected by proprioception and a visual-feedback-dependent process that monitors learning and corrects residual errors but shows no learning itself. We show that our voluntary correction model accurately predicted behavior in multiple situations where visual feedback was used to change acquisition of new walking patterns while the underlying learning was unaffected. The computational and behavioral framework proposed here suggests that parallel learning and error correction systems allow us to rapidly satisfy task demands without necessarily committing to learning, as the relative permanence of learning may be inappropriate or inefficient when facing environments that are liable to change.

KW - adaptation

KW - feedback

KW - gait

KW - locomotion

KW - motor learning

KW - split-belt treadmill

KW - walking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994491869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994491869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.012

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 2707

EP - 2716

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 20

ER -