Seeing is believing: Effects of visual contextual cues on learning and transfer of locomotor adaptation

Gelsy Torres-Oviedo, Amy J Bastian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Devices such as robots or treadmills are often used to drive motor learning because they can create novel physical environments. However, the learning (i.e., adaptation) acquired on these devices only partially generalizes to natural movements. What determines the specificity of motor learning, and can this be reliably made more general? Here we investigated the effect of visual cues on the specificity of split-belt walking adaptation. We systematically removed vision to eliminate the visual-proprioceptive mismatch that is a salient cue specific to treadmills: vision indicates that we are not moving while leg proprioception indicates that we are.Weevaluated the adaptation of temporal and spatial features of gait (i.e., timing and location of foot landing), their transfer to walking over ground, and washout of adaptation when subjects returned to the treadmill. Removing vision during both training (i.e., on the treadmill) and testing (i.e., over ground) strongly improved the transfer of treadmill adaptation to natural walking. Removing vision only during training increased transfer of temporal adaptation, whereas removing vision only during testing increased the transfer of spatial adaptation. This dissociation reveals differences in adaptive mechanisms for temporal and spatial features of walking. Finally training without vision increased the amount that was learned and was linked to the variability in the behavior during adaptation. In conclusion, contextual cues can be manipulated to modulate the magnitude, transfer, and washout of device-induced learning in humans. These results bring us closer to our ultimate goal of developing rehabilitation strategies that improve movements beyond the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17015-17022
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume30
Issue number50
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2010

Fingerprint

Cues
Walking
Learning
Equipment and Supplies
Proprioception
Gait
Transfer (Psychology)
Foot
Leg
Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Seeing is believing : Effects of visual contextual cues on learning and transfer of locomotor adaptation. / Torres-Oviedo, Gelsy; Bastian, Amy J.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 30, No. 50, 15.12.2010, p. 17015-17022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c55989b045d493ca2907f119a8b562e,
title = "Seeing is believing: Effects of visual contextual cues on learning and transfer of locomotor adaptation",
abstract = "Devices such as robots or treadmills are often used to drive motor learning because they can create novel physical environments. However, the learning (i.e., adaptation) acquired on these devices only partially generalizes to natural movements. What determines the specificity of motor learning, and can this be reliably made more general? Here we investigated the effect of visual cues on the specificity of split-belt walking adaptation. We systematically removed vision to eliminate the visual-proprioceptive mismatch that is a salient cue specific to treadmills: vision indicates that we are not moving while leg proprioception indicates that we are.Weevaluated the adaptation of temporal and spatial features of gait (i.e., timing and location of foot landing), their transfer to walking over ground, and washout of adaptation when subjects returned to the treadmill. Removing vision during both training (i.e., on the treadmill) and testing (i.e., over ground) strongly improved the transfer of treadmill adaptation to natural walking. Removing vision only during training increased transfer of temporal adaptation, whereas removing vision only during testing increased the transfer of spatial adaptation. This dissociation reveals differences in adaptive mechanisms for temporal and spatial features of walking. Finally training without vision increased the amount that was learned and was linked to the variability in the behavior during adaptation. In conclusion, contextual cues can be manipulated to modulate the magnitude, transfer, and washout of device-induced learning in humans. These results bring us closer to our ultimate goal of developing rehabilitation strategies that improve movements beyond the clinical setting.",
author = "Gelsy Torres-Oviedo and Bastian, {Amy J}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4205-10.2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "17015--17022",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "50",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing is believing

T2 - Effects of visual contextual cues on learning and transfer of locomotor adaptation

AU - Torres-Oviedo, Gelsy

AU - Bastian, Amy J

PY - 2010/12/15

Y1 - 2010/12/15

N2 - Devices such as robots or treadmills are often used to drive motor learning because they can create novel physical environments. However, the learning (i.e., adaptation) acquired on these devices only partially generalizes to natural movements. What determines the specificity of motor learning, and can this be reliably made more general? Here we investigated the effect of visual cues on the specificity of split-belt walking adaptation. We systematically removed vision to eliminate the visual-proprioceptive mismatch that is a salient cue specific to treadmills: vision indicates that we are not moving while leg proprioception indicates that we are.Weevaluated the adaptation of temporal and spatial features of gait (i.e., timing and location of foot landing), their transfer to walking over ground, and washout of adaptation when subjects returned to the treadmill. Removing vision during both training (i.e., on the treadmill) and testing (i.e., over ground) strongly improved the transfer of treadmill adaptation to natural walking. Removing vision only during training increased transfer of temporal adaptation, whereas removing vision only during testing increased the transfer of spatial adaptation. This dissociation reveals differences in adaptive mechanisms for temporal and spatial features of walking. Finally training without vision increased the amount that was learned and was linked to the variability in the behavior during adaptation. In conclusion, contextual cues can be manipulated to modulate the magnitude, transfer, and washout of device-induced learning in humans. These results bring us closer to our ultimate goal of developing rehabilitation strategies that improve movements beyond the clinical setting.

AB - Devices such as robots or treadmills are often used to drive motor learning because they can create novel physical environments. However, the learning (i.e., adaptation) acquired on these devices only partially generalizes to natural movements. What determines the specificity of motor learning, and can this be reliably made more general? Here we investigated the effect of visual cues on the specificity of split-belt walking adaptation. We systematically removed vision to eliminate the visual-proprioceptive mismatch that is a salient cue specific to treadmills: vision indicates that we are not moving while leg proprioception indicates that we are.Weevaluated the adaptation of temporal and spatial features of gait (i.e., timing and location of foot landing), their transfer to walking over ground, and washout of adaptation when subjects returned to the treadmill. Removing vision during both training (i.e., on the treadmill) and testing (i.e., over ground) strongly improved the transfer of treadmill adaptation to natural walking. Removing vision only during training increased transfer of temporal adaptation, whereas removing vision only during testing increased the transfer of spatial adaptation. This dissociation reveals differences in adaptive mechanisms for temporal and spatial features of walking. Finally training without vision increased the amount that was learned and was linked to the variability in the behavior during adaptation. In conclusion, contextual cues can be manipulated to modulate the magnitude, transfer, and washout of device-induced learning in humans. These results bring us closer to our ultimate goal of developing rehabilitation strategies that improve movements beyond the clinical setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650389045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650389045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4205-10.2010

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4205-10.2010

M3 - Article

C2 - 21159971

AN - SCOPUS:78650389045

VL - 30

SP - 17015

EP - 17022

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 50

ER -