Scientific uses of animals

Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs

G. Griffin, J. MacArthur Clark, J. Zurlo, M. Ritskes-Hoitinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The principles of humane experimental technique, first described by Russell and Burch in 1959, focus on minimising suffering to animals used for scientific purposes. Internationally, as these principles became embedded in the various systems of oversight for the use of animals in science, attention focused on how to minimise pain, distress and lasting harm to animals while maximising the benefits to be obtained from the work. Suffering can arise from the experimental procedures, but it can also arise from the manner in which the animals are housed and cared for. Increased attention is therefore being paid to the entire lifetime experience of an animal, in order to afford it as good a quality of life as possible. Russell and Burch were also concerned that animals should not be used if alternatives to such use were available, and that animals were not wasted through poor-quality science. This concept is being revisited through new efforts to ensure that experiments are well designed and properly reported in the literature, that all results - positive, negative or neutral - are made available to ensure a complete research record, and that animal models are properly evaluated through periodic systematic reviews. These efforts should ensure that animal use is truly reduced as far as possible and that the benefits derived through the use of animals truly outweigh the harms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-272
Number of pages8
JournalOIE Revue Scientifique et Technique
Volume33
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

animal use alternatives
animals
systematic review
animal science
distress
quality of life
pain
animal models

Keywords

  • Experimental design
  • Harm-benefit analysis
  • Meta-analysis
  • Publication standard
  • Reduction
  • Refinement
  • Systematic review
  • Three Rs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Griffin, G., MacArthur Clark, J., Zurlo, J., & Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. (2014). Scientific uses of animals: Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 33(1), 265-272.

Scientific uses of animals : Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs. / Griffin, G.; MacArthur Clark, J.; Zurlo, J.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.

In: OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2014, p. 265-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griffin, G, MacArthur Clark, J, Zurlo, J & Ritskes-Hoitinga, M 2014, 'Scientific uses of animals: Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs', OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 265-272.
Griffin, G. ; MacArthur Clark, J. ; Zurlo, J. ; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. / Scientific uses of animals : Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs. In: OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique. 2014 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 265-272.
@article{9ab00da1efe3429ab6c208fb99087245,
title = "Scientific uses of animals: Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs",
abstract = "The principles of humane experimental technique, first described by Russell and Burch in 1959, focus on minimising suffering to animals used for scientific purposes. Internationally, as these principles became embedded in the various systems of oversight for the use of animals in science, attention focused on how to minimise pain, distress and lasting harm to animals while maximising the benefits to be obtained from the work. Suffering can arise from the experimental procedures, but it can also arise from the manner in which the animals are housed and cared for. Increased attention is therefore being paid to the entire lifetime experience of an animal, in order to afford it as good a quality of life as possible. Russell and Burch were also concerned that animals should not be used if alternatives to such use were available, and that animals were not wasted through poor-quality science. This concept is being revisited through new efforts to ensure that experiments are well designed and properly reported in the literature, that all results - positive, negative or neutral - are made available to ensure a complete research record, and that animal models are properly evaluated through periodic systematic reviews. These efforts should ensure that animal use is truly reduced as far as possible and that the benefits derived through the use of animals truly outweigh the harms.",
keywords = "Experimental design, Harm-benefit analysis, Meta-analysis, Publication standard, Reduction, Refinement, Systematic review, Three Rs",
author = "G. Griffin and {MacArthur Clark}, J. and J. Zurlo and M. Ritskes-Hoitinga",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "265--272",
journal = "OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique",
issn = "0253-1933",
publisher = "Office International des Epizooties",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific uses of animals

T2 - Harm-benefit analysis and complementary approaches to implementing the Three Rs

AU - Griffin, G.

AU - MacArthur Clark, J.

AU - Zurlo, J.

AU - Ritskes-Hoitinga, M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The principles of humane experimental technique, first described by Russell and Burch in 1959, focus on minimising suffering to animals used for scientific purposes. Internationally, as these principles became embedded in the various systems of oversight for the use of animals in science, attention focused on how to minimise pain, distress and lasting harm to animals while maximising the benefits to be obtained from the work. Suffering can arise from the experimental procedures, but it can also arise from the manner in which the animals are housed and cared for. Increased attention is therefore being paid to the entire lifetime experience of an animal, in order to afford it as good a quality of life as possible. Russell and Burch were also concerned that animals should not be used if alternatives to such use were available, and that animals were not wasted through poor-quality science. This concept is being revisited through new efforts to ensure that experiments are well designed and properly reported in the literature, that all results - positive, negative or neutral - are made available to ensure a complete research record, and that animal models are properly evaluated through periodic systematic reviews. These efforts should ensure that animal use is truly reduced as far as possible and that the benefits derived through the use of animals truly outweigh the harms.

AB - The principles of humane experimental technique, first described by Russell and Burch in 1959, focus on minimising suffering to animals used for scientific purposes. Internationally, as these principles became embedded in the various systems of oversight for the use of animals in science, attention focused on how to minimise pain, distress and lasting harm to animals while maximising the benefits to be obtained from the work. Suffering can arise from the experimental procedures, but it can also arise from the manner in which the animals are housed and cared for. Increased attention is therefore being paid to the entire lifetime experience of an animal, in order to afford it as good a quality of life as possible. Russell and Burch were also concerned that animals should not be used if alternatives to such use were available, and that animals were not wasted through poor-quality science. This concept is being revisited through new efforts to ensure that experiments are well designed and properly reported in the literature, that all results - positive, negative or neutral - are made available to ensure a complete research record, and that animal models are properly evaluated through periodic systematic reviews. These efforts should ensure that animal use is truly reduced as far as possible and that the benefits derived through the use of animals truly outweigh the harms.

KW - Experimental design

KW - Harm-benefit analysis

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Publication standard

KW - Reduction

KW - Refinement

KW - Systematic review

KW - Three Rs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904311711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904311711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 265

EP - 272

JO - OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique

JF - OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique

SN - 0253-1933

IS - 1

ER -