TY - JOUR
T1 - Scaling properties of pain intensity ratings in paediatric populations using the Faces Pain Scale-revised
T2 - Secondary analyses of published data based on the item response theory
AU - Avian, Alexander
AU - Messerer, Brigitte
AU - Frey, Andreas
AU - Meissner, Winfried
AU - Weinberg, Annelie
AU - Ravekes, William
AU - Berghold, Andrea
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank C. von Baeyer for his valuable comments during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This study was supported by funds of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Anniversary Fund, project number: 14335) and the DFG (German Research Foundation, project number FR 2552/5-1). The first author was supported by the DFG and Oesterreichische Nationalbank. The funding source had no role in the study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or writing of the report. The authors thank C. Weinmann for her excellent English proofreading.
Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank C. von Baeyer for his valuable comments during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This study was supported by funds of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Anniversary Fund, project number: 14335) and the DFG (German Research Foundation, project number FR 2552/5-1). The first author was supported by the DFG and Oesterreichische Nationalbank. The funding source had no role in the study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data or writing of the report. The authors thank C. Weinmann for her excellent English proofreading.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - Background: The Faces Pain Scale-revised (FPS-r) has been developed as an interval scale. For other pain measurement instruments, several studies found evidence for and against an interval level of measurement. Objectives: The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate the scale properties of the FPS-r using an item response theory approach. Design: Secondary analysis of published data. Setting: Three studies; Study 1 and study 2: One university hospital; Study 3: international pain registry. Participants: Study 1: n = 246, female: 41%, age: 11–18 years, 3 pain items; Study 2: n = 240, female: 43%, age: 11–18 years, 9 pain items; Study 3: n = 2266, female: 41%, age: 4–18 years, 3 pain items. Methods: The rating scale model (interval scale), the graded response model (no interval scale, ordered response categories) and the partial credit model (no interval scale) were used to scale the data. Results: In all three studies, the rating scale model was outperformed by the graded response model or the partial credit model in terms of model fit. Overlapping response categories were found in items associated with less pain. Response category widths were wider for categories associated with low pain intensity and smaller for categories associated with high pain intensities. Smallest response categories were 1%–67% smaller compared to the widest response category of the same item. Conclusion: According to these findings, the interval scale properties of the FPS-r may be questioned. Item response theory methods may help to solve the problem of missing linearity in pain intensity ratings using FPS-r.
AB - Background: The Faces Pain Scale-revised (FPS-r) has been developed as an interval scale. For other pain measurement instruments, several studies found evidence for and against an interval level of measurement. Objectives: The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate the scale properties of the FPS-r using an item response theory approach. Design: Secondary analysis of published data. Setting: Three studies; Study 1 and study 2: One university hospital; Study 3: international pain registry. Participants: Study 1: n = 246, female: 41%, age: 11–18 years, 3 pain items; Study 2: n = 240, female: 43%, age: 11–18 years, 9 pain items; Study 3: n = 2266, female: 41%, age: 4–18 years, 3 pain items. Methods: The rating scale model (interval scale), the graded response model (no interval scale, ordered response categories) and the partial credit model (no interval scale) were used to scale the data. Results: In all three studies, the rating scale model was outperformed by the graded response model or the partial credit model in terms of model fit. Overlapping response categories were found in items associated with less pain. Response category widths were wider for categories associated with low pain intensity and smaller for categories associated with high pain intensities. Smallest response categories were 1%–67% smaller compared to the widest response category of the same item. Conclusion: According to these findings, the interval scale properties of the FPS-r may be questioned. Item response theory methods may help to solve the problem of missing linearity in pain intensity ratings using FPS-r.
KW - Pain measurement
KW - Pediatrics
KW - Scale propertiers
KW - Surveys and questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050402218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050402218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 30055373
AN - SCOPUS:85050402218
SN - 0020-7489
VL - 87
SP - 49
EP - 59
JO - International journal of nursing studies
JF - International journal of nursing studies
ER -