Sarcopenia: Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function

Anne B. Newman, Varant Kupelian, Marjolein Visser, Eleanor Marie Simonsick, Bret Goodpaster, Michael Nevitt, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Frances A. Tylavsky, Susan M. Rubin, Tamara B. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare two sarcopenia definitions and examine the relationship between them and lower extremity function and other health related factors using data from the baseline examination of the Health Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Two U.S. communities in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 70 to 79 (N = 2,984, 52% women, 41% black). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and were classified as sarcopenic using two different approaches to adjust lean mass for body size: appendicular lean mass divided by height-squared (aLM/ht2) and appendicular lean mass adjusted for height and body fat mass (residuals). RESULTS: These methods differed substantially in the classification of individuals as being sarcopenic, especially those who were more obese. The former method was highly correlated with body mass index and identified fewer overweight or obese individuals as sarcopenic. In both men and women, none of the obese group would be considered sarcopenic using the aLM/ht2 method, compared with 11.5% of men and 21.0% of women using the residuals method. In men, both classifications of sarcopenia were associated with smoking, poorer health, lower activity, and impaired lower extremity function. Fewer associations with health factors were noted in women, but the classification based on both height and fat mass was more strongly associated with lower extremity functional limitations (odds ratio (OR)= 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.2 for low kg/ht 2; OR= 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5 for lean mass adjusted for height and fat mass). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that fat mass should be considered in estimating prevalence of sarcopenia in women and in overweight or obese individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1602-1609
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sarcopenia
Lower Extremity
Fats
Health
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Body Size
Body Composition
Observational Studies
Adipose Tissue
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Smoking
X-Rays

Keywords

  • Muscle mass
  • Physical function
  • Sarcopenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Sarcopenia : Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function. / Newman, Anne B.; Kupelian, Varant; Visser, Marjolein; Simonsick, Eleanor Marie; Goodpaster, Bret; Nevitt, Michael; Kritchevsky, Stephen B.; Tylavsky, Frances A.; Rubin, Susan M.; Harris, Tamara B.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 51, No. 11, 11.2003, p. 1602-1609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newman, AB, Kupelian, V, Visser, M, Simonsick, EM, Goodpaster, B, Nevitt, M, Kritchevsky, SB, Tylavsky, FA, Rubin, SM & Harris, TB 2003, 'Sarcopenia: Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function', Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1602-1609. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51534.x
Newman, Anne B. ; Kupelian, Varant ; Visser, Marjolein ; Simonsick, Eleanor Marie ; Goodpaster, Bret ; Nevitt, Michael ; Kritchevsky, Stephen B. ; Tylavsky, Frances A. ; Rubin, Susan M. ; Harris, Tamara B. / Sarcopenia : Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2003 ; Vol. 51, No. 11. pp. 1602-1609.
@article{5f0dc652b61645809eee38f814220bc3,
title = "Sarcopenia: Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To compare two sarcopenia definitions and examine the relationship between them and lower extremity function and other health related factors using data from the baseline examination of the Health Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Two U.S. communities in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 70 to 79 (N = 2,984, 52{\%} women, 41{\%} black). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and were classified as sarcopenic using two different approaches to adjust lean mass for body size: appendicular lean mass divided by height-squared (aLM/ht2) and appendicular lean mass adjusted for height and body fat mass (residuals). RESULTS: These methods differed substantially in the classification of individuals as being sarcopenic, especially those who were more obese. The former method was highly correlated with body mass index and identified fewer overweight or obese individuals as sarcopenic. In both men and women, none of the obese group would be considered sarcopenic using the aLM/ht2 method, compared with 11.5{\%} of men and 21.0{\%} of women using the residuals method. In men, both classifications of sarcopenia were associated with smoking, poorer health, lower activity, and impaired lower extremity function. Fewer associations with health factors were noted in women, but the classification based on both height and fat mass was more strongly associated with lower extremity functional limitations (odds ratio (OR)= 0.9, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.2 for low kg/ht 2; OR= 1.9, 95{\%} CI = 1.4-2.5 for lean mass adjusted for height and fat mass). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that fat mass should be considered in estimating prevalence of sarcopenia in women and in overweight or obese individuals.",
keywords = "Muscle mass, Physical function, Sarcopenia",
author = "Newman, {Anne B.} and Varant Kupelian and Marjolein Visser and Simonsick, {Eleanor Marie} and Bret Goodpaster and Michael Nevitt and Kritchevsky, {Stephen B.} and Tylavsky, {Frances A.} and Rubin, {Susan M.} and Harris, {Tamara B.}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51534.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1602--1609",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sarcopenia

T2 - Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function

AU - Newman, Anne B.

AU - Kupelian, Varant

AU - Visser, Marjolein

AU - Simonsick, Eleanor Marie

AU - Goodpaster, Bret

AU - Nevitt, Michael

AU - Kritchevsky, Stephen B.

AU - Tylavsky, Frances A.

AU - Rubin, Susan M.

AU - Harris, Tamara B.

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare two sarcopenia definitions and examine the relationship between them and lower extremity function and other health related factors using data from the baseline examination of the Health Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Two U.S. communities in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 70 to 79 (N = 2,984, 52% women, 41% black). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and were classified as sarcopenic using two different approaches to adjust lean mass for body size: appendicular lean mass divided by height-squared (aLM/ht2) and appendicular lean mass adjusted for height and body fat mass (residuals). RESULTS: These methods differed substantially in the classification of individuals as being sarcopenic, especially those who were more obese. The former method was highly correlated with body mass index and identified fewer overweight or obese individuals as sarcopenic. In both men and women, none of the obese group would be considered sarcopenic using the aLM/ht2 method, compared with 11.5% of men and 21.0% of women using the residuals method. In men, both classifications of sarcopenia were associated with smoking, poorer health, lower activity, and impaired lower extremity function. Fewer associations with health factors were noted in women, but the classification based on both height and fat mass was more strongly associated with lower extremity functional limitations (odds ratio (OR)= 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.2 for low kg/ht 2; OR= 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5 for lean mass adjusted for height and fat mass). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that fat mass should be considered in estimating prevalence of sarcopenia in women and in overweight or obese individuals.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To compare two sarcopenia definitions and examine the relationship between them and lower extremity function and other health related factors using data from the baseline examination of the Health Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Two U.S. communities in Memphis, Tennessee, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 70 to 79 (N = 2,984, 52% women, 41% black). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and were classified as sarcopenic using two different approaches to adjust lean mass for body size: appendicular lean mass divided by height-squared (aLM/ht2) and appendicular lean mass adjusted for height and body fat mass (residuals). RESULTS: These methods differed substantially in the classification of individuals as being sarcopenic, especially those who were more obese. The former method was highly correlated with body mass index and identified fewer overweight or obese individuals as sarcopenic. In both men and women, none of the obese group would be considered sarcopenic using the aLM/ht2 method, compared with 11.5% of men and 21.0% of women using the residuals method. In men, both classifications of sarcopenia were associated with smoking, poorer health, lower activity, and impaired lower extremity function. Fewer associations with health factors were noted in women, but the classification based on both height and fat mass was more strongly associated with lower extremity functional limitations (odds ratio (OR)= 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.2 for low kg/ht 2; OR= 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5 for lean mass adjusted for height and fat mass). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that fat mass should be considered in estimating prevalence of sarcopenia in women and in overweight or obese individuals.

KW - Muscle mass

KW - Physical function

KW - Sarcopenia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10744227011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10744227011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51534.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51534.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 14687390

AN - SCOPUS:10744227011

VL - 51

SP - 1602

EP - 1609

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 11

ER -