Sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis: Classification and risk factors

Sang Hun Lee, Ki Tack Kim, Kyung Soo Suk, Jung Hee Lee, Eun Min Seo, Dae Seok Huh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design.: A retrospective study Objective.: To classify the types and identify related factors on sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK). Summary of Background Data.: There has been a skeptical view of surgical treatment of LDK owing to loss of sagittal balance even after correction of kyphosis. However, there had been no report on the classification and risk factors of sagittal decompensation. Methods.: A total of 23 LDK patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 45.7 months. Radiographic parameters including sagittal balance, the cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles, were analyzed. We classified the type of sagittal decompensation into thoracic (Group T) and lumbar decompensation (Group L) with a reference line from the posterosuperior corner of the sacrum to the center of the T12-L1 disc. The type of sagittal decompensation was defined with the location of T1 and the reference line at the last follow-up radiographs. Results.: The mean number of fusion segments was 7.7. Sagittal balance improved from 26.4 cm to 4 cm immediately after operation but deteriorated to 11.2 cm at the last follow-up. The decompensation was greater in Group T (11 cases) than in Group L (12 cases) (9.1 cm vs. 5.2 cm, P = 0.03). The comparative analysis showed significant differences between groups T and L in thoracic kyphosis at the last follow-up (Group T:L = 40.5°:27.5°, P = 0.04), preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle (Group T:L = 19.6°:-1°, P = 0.01), mean ratio of cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles to intervertebral disc in T12-L1, and incidence of the preoperative compensatory thoracic lordosis (Group T:L = 27.3%:100%, P = 0). Conclusion.: The mean sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for LDK was 38.3%. The etiology was loss of lumbosacral lordosis in Group L and progression of kyphosis at the proximal unfused segments in addition to lumbosacral loss in Group T. The decompensation was greater in the thoracic type than in the lumbar type and was considered relevant to a large preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle, absence of compensatory thoracic lordosis, and atrophy of paravertebral muscles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSpine
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kyphosis
Osteotomy
Thorax
Lordosis
Sacrum
Muscles
Muscular Atrophy
Intervertebral Disc
Retrospective Studies
Incidence

Keywords

  • corrective osteotomy
  • lumbar degenerative kyphosis
  • risk factors
  • sagittal decompensation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis : Classification and risk factors. / Lee, Sang Hun; Kim, Ki Tack; Suk, Kyung Soo; Lee, Jung Hee; Seo, Eun Min; Huh, Dae Seok.

In: Spine, Vol. 36, No. 8, 15.04.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Sang Hun ; Kim, Ki Tack ; Suk, Kyung Soo ; Lee, Jung Hee ; Seo, Eun Min ; Huh, Dae Seok. / Sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis : Classification and risk factors. In: Spine. 2011 ; Vol. 36, No. 8.
@article{17655e420a67491882a6f16e62338407,
title = "Sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis: Classification and risk factors",
abstract = "Study Design.: A retrospective study Objective.: To classify the types and identify related factors on sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK). Summary of Background Data.: There has been a skeptical view of surgical treatment of LDK owing to loss of sagittal balance even after correction of kyphosis. However, there had been no report on the classification and risk factors of sagittal decompensation. Methods.: A total of 23 LDK patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 45.7 months. Radiographic parameters including sagittal balance, the cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles, were analyzed. We classified the type of sagittal decompensation into thoracic (Group T) and lumbar decompensation (Group L) with a reference line from the posterosuperior corner of the sacrum to the center of the T12-L1 disc. The type of sagittal decompensation was defined with the location of T1 and the reference line at the last follow-up radiographs. Results.: The mean number of fusion segments was 7.7. Sagittal balance improved from 26.4 cm to 4 cm immediately after operation but deteriorated to 11.2 cm at the last follow-up. The decompensation was greater in Group T (11 cases) than in Group L (12 cases) (9.1 cm vs. 5.2 cm, P = 0.03). The comparative analysis showed significant differences between groups T and L in thoracic kyphosis at the last follow-up (Group T:L = 40.5°:27.5°, P = 0.04), preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle (Group T:L = 19.6°:-1°, P = 0.01), mean ratio of cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles to intervertebral disc in T12-L1, and incidence of the preoperative compensatory thoracic lordosis (Group T:L = 27.3{\%}:100{\%}, P = 0). Conclusion.: The mean sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for LDK was 38.3{\%}. The etiology was loss of lumbosacral lordosis in Group L and progression of kyphosis at the proximal unfused segments in addition to lumbosacral loss in Group T. The decompensation was greater in the thoracic type than in the lumbar type and was considered relevant to a large preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle, absence of compensatory thoracic lordosis, and atrophy of paravertebral muscles.",
keywords = "corrective osteotomy, lumbar degenerative kyphosis, risk factors, sagittal decompensation",
author = "Lee, {Sang Hun} and Kim, {Ki Tack} and Suk, {Kyung Soo} and Lee, {Jung Hee} and Seo, {Eun Min} and Huh, {Dae Seok}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f45a17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis

T2 - Classification and risk factors

AU - Lee, Sang Hun

AU - Kim, Ki Tack

AU - Suk, Kyung Soo

AU - Lee, Jung Hee

AU - Seo, Eun Min

AU - Huh, Dae Seok

PY - 2011/4/15

Y1 - 2011/4/15

N2 - Study Design.: A retrospective study Objective.: To classify the types and identify related factors on sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK). Summary of Background Data.: There has been a skeptical view of surgical treatment of LDK owing to loss of sagittal balance even after correction of kyphosis. However, there had been no report on the classification and risk factors of sagittal decompensation. Methods.: A total of 23 LDK patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 45.7 months. Radiographic parameters including sagittal balance, the cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles, were analyzed. We classified the type of sagittal decompensation into thoracic (Group T) and lumbar decompensation (Group L) with a reference line from the posterosuperior corner of the sacrum to the center of the T12-L1 disc. The type of sagittal decompensation was defined with the location of T1 and the reference line at the last follow-up radiographs. Results.: The mean number of fusion segments was 7.7. Sagittal balance improved from 26.4 cm to 4 cm immediately after operation but deteriorated to 11.2 cm at the last follow-up. The decompensation was greater in Group T (11 cases) than in Group L (12 cases) (9.1 cm vs. 5.2 cm, P = 0.03). The comparative analysis showed significant differences between groups T and L in thoracic kyphosis at the last follow-up (Group T:L = 40.5°:27.5°, P = 0.04), preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle (Group T:L = 19.6°:-1°, P = 0.01), mean ratio of cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles to intervertebral disc in T12-L1, and incidence of the preoperative compensatory thoracic lordosis (Group T:L = 27.3%:100%, P = 0). Conclusion.: The mean sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for LDK was 38.3%. The etiology was loss of lumbosacral lordosis in Group L and progression of kyphosis at the proximal unfused segments in addition to lumbosacral loss in Group T. The decompensation was greater in the thoracic type than in the lumbar type and was considered relevant to a large preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle, absence of compensatory thoracic lordosis, and atrophy of paravertebral muscles.

AB - Study Design.: A retrospective study Objective.: To classify the types and identify related factors on sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK). Summary of Background Data.: There has been a skeptical view of surgical treatment of LDK owing to loss of sagittal balance even after correction of kyphosis. However, there had been no report on the classification and risk factors of sagittal decompensation. Methods.: A total of 23 LDK patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 45.7 months. Radiographic parameters including sagittal balance, the cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles, were analyzed. We classified the type of sagittal decompensation into thoracic (Group T) and lumbar decompensation (Group L) with a reference line from the posterosuperior corner of the sacrum to the center of the T12-L1 disc. The type of sagittal decompensation was defined with the location of T1 and the reference line at the last follow-up radiographs. Results.: The mean number of fusion segments was 7.7. Sagittal balance improved from 26.4 cm to 4 cm immediately after operation but deteriorated to 11.2 cm at the last follow-up. The decompensation was greater in Group T (11 cases) than in Group L (12 cases) (9.1 cm vs. 5.2 cm, P = 0.03). The comparative analysis showed significant differences between groups T and L in thoracic kyphosis at the last follow-up (Group T:L = 40.5°:27.5°, P = 0.04), preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle (Group T:L = 19.6°:-1°, P = 0.01), mean ratio of cross-sectional area of paravertebral muscles to intervertebral disc in T12-L1, and incidence of the preoperative compensatory thoracic lordosis (Group T:L = 27.3%:100%, P = 0). Conclusion.: The mean sagittal decompensation after corrective osteotomy for LDK was 38.3%. The etiology was loss of lumbosacral lordosis in Group L and progression of kyphosis at the proximal unfused segments in addition to lumbosacral loss in Group T. The decompensation was greater in the thoracic type than in the lumbar type and was considered relevant to a large preoperative thoracic kyphotic angle, absence of compensatory thoracic lordosis, and atrophy of paravertebral muscles.

KW - corrective osteotomy

KW - lumbar degenerative kyphosis

KW - risk factors

KW - sagittal decompensation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955071104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955071104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f45a17

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f45a17

M3 - Article

C2 - 21240054

AN - SCOPUS:79955071104

VL - 36

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 8

ER -