Safety is part of quality: A proposal for a continuum in performance measurement

Vahé A. Kazandjian, Karol G. Wicker, Nikolas Matthes, Sam Ogunbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Safer care is a strategic priority for health care organizations worldwide. Yet, the measurement and evaluation of key processes and outcomes associated with safer care remains challenging, even with existing performance measurement indicators. The multi-national Quality Indicator Project (QI Project®) data are analysed to [1] document the patterns of safety indicators used between 1999 and 2006 among hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA; and [2] to identify trends in using both organization-level and patient-level data in hospital performance improvement. Design and setting: Retrospective data are used to ascertain how the use of safety indicators has changed in comparison to other QI Project® indicators. 'Continent' rather than 'hospital' is used as the unit of analysis and P-values of the differences in use percentages across Asia, Europe and the USA are calculated. Results: There was a significant increase in the use of QI Project® indicators in Asia between 1999 and 2006. Measured as the mean percentage of usage, the safety versus 'all other' indicators' increase in Asia was 43.7% versus 27% (P <0.05) and 37.2% versus 24.4% (P <0.05), respectively, during the study's time period. The European participants used both safety and all other indicators less frequently, 14.7% versus 18% (P <0.05) and 9.5% versus 19.8% (P <0.05), respectively. Finally, USA hospitals demonstrated a larger difference in the decrease of QI Project® indicator use than European hospitals between the 'safety' and 'all other' indicators, 12.7% decrease for safety indicators and 7.1% for all others (P <0.05). These findings are consistent with trends reported in a previous study. Conclusion: Traditional performance measures continue to assist hospitals in identifying crucial aspects of safety in the delivery of care. Building on the findings of a previous study, there are emerging trends in the type of measures used in hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA pursuing the improvement of overall performance. The increasing use of patient-level data specifically, in tandem with organizational level indicators, may signal the continuum of measurement strategies, now still predominately in the USA but anticipated to be adopted both in Europe and Asia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)354-359
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Safety
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Patient-level data
  • Quality Indicator Project®
  • Safety of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Safety is part of quality : A proposal for a continuum in performance measurement. / Kazandjian, Vahé A.; Wicker, Karol G.; Matthes, Nikolas; Ogunbo, Sam.

In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 14, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 354-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kazandjian, Vahé A. ; Wicker, Karol G. ; Matthes, Nikolas ; Ogunbo, Sam. / Safety is part of quality : A proposal for a continuum in performance measurement. In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 354-359.
@article{7c21da3c34f545409a4ccd1306f64e49,
title = "Safety is part of quality: A proposal for a continuum in performance measurement",
abstract = "Objectives: Safer care is a strategic priority for health care organizations worldwide. Yet, the measurement and evaluation of key processes and outcomes associated with safer care remains challenging, even with existing performance measurement indicators. The multi-national Quality Indicator Project (QI Project{\circledR}) data are analysed to [1] document the patterns of safety indicators used between 1999 and 2006 among hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA; and [2] to identify trends in using both organization-level and patient-level data in hospital performance improvement. Design and setting: Retrospective data are used to ascertain how the use of safety indicators has changed in comparison to other QI Project{\circledR} indicators. 'Continent' rather than 'hospital' is used as the unit of analysis and P-values of the differences in use percentages across Asia, Europe and the USA are calculated. Results: There was a significant increase in the use of QI Project{\circledR} indicators in Asia between 1999 and 2006. Measured as the mean percentage of usage, the safety versus 'all other' indicators' increase in Asia was 43.7{\%} versus 27{\%} (P <0.05) and 37.2{\%} versus 24.4{\%} (P <0.05), respectively, during the study's time period. The European participants used both safety and all other indicators less frequently, 14.7{\%} versus 18{\%} (P <0.05) and 9.5{\%} versus 19.8{\%} (P <0.05), respectively. Finally, USA hospitals demonstrated a larger difference in the decrease of QI Project{\circledR} indicator use than European hospitals between the 'safety' and 'all other' indicators, 12.7{\%} decrease for safety indicators and 7.1{\%} for all others (P <0.05). These findings are consistent with trends reported in a previous study. Conclusion: Traditional performance measures continue to assist hospitals in identifying crucial aspects of safety in the delivery of care. Building on the findings of a previous study, there are emerging trends in the type of measures used in hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA pursuing the improvement of overall performance. The increasing use of patient-level data specifically, in tandem with organizational level indicators, may signal the continuum of measurement strategies, now still predominately in the USA but anticipated to be adopted both in Europe and Asia.",
keywords = "Patient-level data, Quality Indicator Project{\circledR}, Safety of care",
author = "Kazandjian, {Vah{\'e} A.} and Wicker, {Karol G.} and Nikolas Matthes and Sam Ogunbo",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00960.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "354--359",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety is part of quality

T2 - A proposal for a continuum in performance measurement

AU - Kazandjian, Vahé A.

AU - Wicker, Karol G.

AU - Matthes, Nikolas

AU - Ogunbo, Sam

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objectives: Safer care is a strategic priority for health care organizations worldwide. Yet, the measurement and evaluation of key processes and outcomes associated with safer care remains challenging, even with existing performance measurement indicators. The multi-national Quality Indicator Project (QI Project®) data are analysed to [1] document the patterns of safety indicators used between 1999 and 2006 among hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA; and [2] to identify trends in using both organization-level and patient-level data in hospital performance improvement. Design and setting: Retrospective data are used to ascertain how the use of safety indicators has changed in comparison to other QI Project® indicators. 'Continent' rather than 'hospital' is used as the unit of analysis and P-values of the differences in use percentages across Asia, Europe and the USA are calculated. Results: There was a significant increase in the use of QI Project® indicators in Asia between 1999 and 2006. Measured as the mean percentage of usage, the safety versus 'all other' indicators' increase in Asia was 43.7% versus 27% (P <0.05) and 37.2% versus 24.4% (P <0.05), respectively, during the study's time period. The European participants used both safety and all other indicators less frequently, 14.7% versus 18% (P <0.05) and 9.5% versus 19.8% (P <0.05), respectively. Finally, USA hospitals demonstrated a larger difference in the decrease of QI Project® indicator use than European hospitals between the 'safety' and 'all other' indicators, 12.7% decrease for safety indicators and 7.1% for all others (P <0.05). These findings are consistent with trends reported in a previous study. Conclusion: Traditional performance measures continue to assist hospitals in identifying crucial aspects of safety in the delivery of care. Building on the findings of a previous study, there are emerging trends in the type of measures used in hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA pursuing the improvement of overall performance. The increasing use of patient-level data specifically, in tandem with organizational level indicators, may signal the continuum of measurement strategies, now still predominately in the USA but anticipated to be adopted both in Europe and Asia.

AB - Objectives: Safer care is a strategic priority for health care organizations worldwide. Yet, the measurement and evaluation of key processes and outcomes associated with safer care remains challenging, even with existing performance measurement indicators. The multi-national Quality Indicator Project (QI Project®) data are analysed to [1] document the patterns of safety indicators used between 1999 and 2006 among hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA; and [2] to identify trends in using both organization-level and patient-level data in hospital performance improvement. Design and setting: Retrospective data are used to ascertain how the use of safety indicators has changed in comparison to other QI Project® indicators. 'Continent' rather than 'hospital' is used as the unit of analysis and P-values of the differences in use percentages across Asia, Europe and the USA are calculated. Results: There was a significant increase in the use of QI Project® indicators in Asia between 1999 and 2006. Measured as the mean percentage of usage, the safety versus 'all other' indicators' increase in Asia was 43.7% versus 27% (P <0.05) and 37.2% versus 24.4% (P <0.05), respectively, during the study's time period. The European participants used both safety and all other indicators less frequently, 14.7% versus 18% (P <0.05) and 9.5% versus 19.8% (P <0.05), respectively. Finally, USA hospitals demonstrated a larger difference in the decrease of QI Project® indicator use than European hospitals between the 'safety' and 'all other' indicators, 12.7% decrease for safety indicators and 7.1% for all others (P <0.05). These findings are consistent with trends reported in a previous study. Conclusion: Traditional performance measures continue to assist hospitals in identifying crucial aspects of safety in the delivery of care. Building on the findings of a previous study, there are emerging trends in the type of measures used in hospitals in Asia, Europe and the USA pursuing the improvement of overall performance. The increasing use of patient-level data specifically, in tandem with organizational level indicators, may signal the continuum of measurement strategies, now still predominately in the USA but anticipated to be adopted both in Europe and Asia.

KW - Patient-level data

KW - Quality Indicator Project®

KW - Safety of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40449095181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40449095181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00960.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00960.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18324943

AN - SCOPUS:40449095181

VL - 14

SP - 354

EP - 359

JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

SN - 1356-1294

IS - 2

ER -