TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of apalutamide in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy
T2 - Final report for the Japanese subpopulation analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III TITAN study
AU - Uemura, Hirotsugu
AU - Arai, Gaku
AU - Uemura, Hiroji
AU - Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
AU - Aoyama, Junya
AU - Hatayama, Tomoyoshi
AU - Ito, Miku
AU - Lefresne, Florence
AU - McCarthy, Sharon
AU - Mundle, Suneel
AU - He, Jin
AU - Chi, Kim N.
N1 - Funding Information:
Hirotsugu Uemura has received lecture fees from Pfizer Japan, Ono, Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, MSD; research fees/grants from Taiho, JPKK, Mebix, MSD, Astellas, Quintiles, Covance, Bayer Yakuhin, Parexel International, Pfizer Japan, ICON Japan, Ono, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, EPS, PPDSNBL, Takeda, Chugai, IQVIA, Mediscience Planning, and Osaka Urology Research Foundation; and scholarship/encouragement donations from Asahi Kasei, Kissei, and Novartis. Gaku Arai has received lecture fees from JPKK. Hiroji Uemura has received lecture fees from JPKK, Bayer Yakuhin, and Takeda; scholarship/encouragement donations from Takeda; and travel fees from JPKK, Bayer Yakuhin, Takeda, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, and Kyowa Kirin. Hiroyoshi Suzuki has received lecture fees from Takeda, Astellas, AstraZeneca, JPKK, Sanofi, Bayer Yakuhin, MSD; research fee/grants from Takeda, Astellas, JPKK, AstraZeneca, Roche/Chugai; and scholarship/encouragement donations from Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Kissei, Ono, Bayer Yakuhin, Sanofi, Nihon Shinyaku. Junya Aoyama, Tomoyoshi Hatayama, and Miku Ito are employees of JPKK. Florence Lefresne is an employee of Janssen Research and Development. Sharon McCarthy and Suneel Mundle are employees of Janssen R&D US. Jin He is an employee of Janssen Asia Pacific. Kim N Chi has received lecture fees and research fees/grants from Janssen R&D.
Funding Information:
The authors thank the study patients, without whom this study would never have been accomplished, and all the investigators and study coordinators for their contributions. They also thank ASCA Corporation for medical writing assistance, Ryo Yano, PhD (CMIC Ashfield Co., Ltd.) for publication support, Keiichiro Imanaka, MD, PhD and Koji Fujii, PhD, MBA (Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. [JPKK]) for medical advice for Japanese patients in the TITAN study. The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and JPKK.
Funding Information:
The authors thank the study patients, without whom this study would never have been accomplished, and all the investigators and study coordinators for their contributions. They also thank ASCA Corporation for medical writing assistance, Ryo Yano, PhD (CMIC Ashfield Co., Ltd.) for publication support, Keiichiro Imanaka, MD, PhD and Koji Fujii, PhD, MBA (Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. [JPKK]) for medical advice for Japanese patients in the TITAN study. The study was funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC and Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Objectives: The TITAN study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial that evaluated apalutamide with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. At the first interim analysis in the Japanese subpopulation (median follow-up 25.7 months), there was an improvement in overall survival and radiological progression-free survival with apalutamide versus placebo. Here, we report the final analysis results for the Japanese subpopulation. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apalutamide 240 mg or placebo. After the first interim analysis, protocol treatment was unblinded, and crossover was allowed. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in the preplanned, event-driven final analysis. Results: Fifty-one patients were Japanese (apalutamide n = 28; placebo n = 23). After a median follow-up of 46.0 months, the median overall survival was not reached neither in the apalutamide nor the placebo group; the hazard ratio was 0.45, favoring apalutamide, which was consistent with the overall population. Hazard ratios for time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (0.39), time to pain progression (0.87), and time to chronic opioid use (0.82) also favored apalutamide and were comparable with those of the overall population. Time to prostate-specific antigen progression and progression-free survival 2, respectively, was favored in the apalutamide group (0.21 and 0.44). Apalutamide was associated with higher incidences of rash and fracture in the Japanese subpopulation compared with the overall population. Conclusions: The efficacy of apalutamide with androgen deprivation therapy in Japanese patients was consistent with efficacy demonstrated in the overall population. No new safety concerns emerged with long-term follow-up.
AB - Objectives: The TITAN study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial that evaluated apalutamide with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. At the first interim analysis in the Japanese subpopulation (median follow-up 25.7 months), there was an improvement in overall survival and radiological progression-free survival with apalutamide versus placebo. Here, we report the final analysis results for the Japanese subpopulation. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apalutamide 240 mg or placebo. After the first interim analysis, protocol treatment was unblinded, and crossover was allowed. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in the preplanned, event-driven final analysis. Results: Fifty-one patients were Japanese (apalutamide n = 28; placebo n = 23). After a median follow-up of 46.0 months, the median overall survival was not reached neither in the apalutamide nor the placebo group; the hazard ratio was 0.45, favoring apalutamide, which was consistent with the overall population. Hazard ratios for time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (0.39), time to pain progression (0.87), and time to chronic opioid use (0.82) also favored apalutamide and were comparable with those of the overall population. Time to prostate-specific antigen progression and progression-free survival 2, respectively, was favored in the apalutamide group (0.21 and 0.44). Apalutamide was associated with higher incidences of rash and fracture in the Japanese subpopulation compared with the overall population. Conclusions: The efficacy of apalutamide with androgen deprivation therapy in Japanese patients was consistent with efficacy demonstrated in the overall population. No new safety concerns emerged with long-term follow-up.
KW - Japan
KW - androgen deprivation therapy
KW - apalutamide
KW - metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126188220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126188220&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iju.14843
DO - 10.1111/iju.14843
M3 - Article
C2 - 35293030
AN - SCOPUS:85126188220
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 29
SP - 533
EP - 540
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 6
ER -