TY - JOUR
T1 - SAFE Homes
T2 - Is it worth the cost? An evaluation of a group home permanency planning program for children who first enter out-of-home care
AU - DeSena, Allen D.
AU - Murphy, Robert A.
AU - Douglas-Palumberi, Heather
AU - Blau, Gary
AU - Kelly, Blandina
AU - Horwitz, Sarah M.
AU - Kaufman, Joan
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the State of Connecticut, Department of Children and Families, and the National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Veterans Administration, West Haven, Connecticut.
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the SAFE Homes (SH) program, a short-term group care program for children between 3 and 12 years of age who enter care for the first time. The program aims to improve case outcomes by consolidating resources to facilitate assessment and treatment planning. Methods: The 1-year outcomes of 342 children who received SAFE Home services and 342 matched foster care (FC) control children were compared. The 684 subjects used in this report were selected from a larger pool of 909 subjects using propensity score matching to control for hidden bias in treatment group assignment. We hypothesized that SAFE Homes would result in greater continuity of care for children (e.g., fewer placements, more placements with siblings and in towns of origin), identification of more relatives for substitute care when needed, reduced use of high-cost restrictive care settings (e.g., residential, inpatient), and reduced rates of re-abuse through earlier detection and provision of services to meet child and family treatment needs. Results: Prior to the initiation of the SAFE Homes program, 75% of the children who entered care in the State experienced three or more placements in the first year. The outcomes of both the SH and FC cases were significantly improved over pre-SAFE Home State statistics. The FC group, however, had comparable or better outcomes on most variables examined. In addition, the total cost for out-of-home care for the children in FC was significantly less, despite the fact that the two groups spent similar amounts of time in care (average time in care: 7 months). This finding held when the total placement cost was calculated using the State reimbursement rate of $206.00 per day for SAFE Home care (SH: $20,851 ± 24,231; FC: $8,441 ± 21,126, p < .001), and a conservative SAFE Home program fee of $85.00 per day that only considered the child care and custodial staffing costs uniquely associated with the program (SH: $13,314 ± 21,718; FC: $8,441 ± 21,126, p < .001). Conclusion: Improvements in outcomes related to continuity of care can be attained through staff training. The SAFE Home model of care is not cost-effective for first-time placements.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the SAFE Homes (SH) program, a short-term group care program for children between 3 and 12 years of age who enter care for the first time. The program aims to improve case outcomes by consolidating resources to facilitate assessment and treatment planning. Methods: The 1-year outcomes of 342 children who received SAFE Home services and 342 matched foster care (FC) control children were compared. The 684 subjects used in this report were selected from a larger pool of 909 subjects using propensity score matching to control for hidden bias in treatment group assignment. We hypothesized that SAFE Homes would result in greater continuity of care for children (e.g., fewer placements, more placements with siblings and in towns of origin), identification of more relatives for substitute care when needed, reduced use of high-cost restrictive care settings (e.g., residential, inpatient), and reduced rates of re-abuse through earlier detection and provision of services to meet child and family treatment needs. Results: Prior to the initiation of the SAFE Homes program, 75% of the children who entered care in the State experienced three or more placements in the first year. The outcomes of both the SH and FC cases were significantly improved over pre-SAFE Home State statistics. The FC group, however, had comparable or better outcomes on most variables examined. In addition, the total cost for out-of-home care for the children in FC was significantly less, despite the fact that the two groups spent similar amounts of time in care (average time in care: 7 months). This finding held when the total placement cost was calculated using the State reimbursement rate of $206.00 per day for SAFE Home care (SH: $20,851 ± 24,231; FC: $8,441 ± 21,126, p < .001), and a conservative SAFE Home program fee of $85.00 per day that only considered the child care and custodial staffing costs uniquely associated with the program (SH: $13,314 ± 21,718; FC: $8,441 ± 21,126, p < .001). Conclusion: Improvements in outcomes related to continuity of care can be attained through staff training. The SAFE Home model of care is not cost-effective for first-time placements.
KW - Foster care
KW - Permanency planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22144469047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22144469047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 15979706
AN - SCOPUS:22144469047
SN - 0145-2134
VL - 29
SP - 627
EP - 643
JO - Child Abuse and Neglect
JF - Child Abuse and Neglect
IS - 6
ER -