Rural versus urban compliance in the management of cryptorchidism: is there a difference?

Dana Point, Chad Morley, Ali Tourchi, Sunil Reddy, Pokket Sirisreetreerux, John Phillip Gearhart, Osama Al-Omar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors compared the age and referral patterns of pediatric patients undergoing surgical intervention for cryptorchidism at a rural, West Virginia University, versus urban, Johns Hopkins University, tertiary center. A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical evaluation for cryptorchidism was performed. Patients treated for reasons unrelated to cryptorchidism or referred for multiple urologic diagnoses were excluded. The patients at each institution were then divided into four groups based on their corrected gestational age at time of surgery. Referral times and provider specialties were also obtained. A total of 131 cases at the urban center and 100 cases at the rural center were identified. At the rural center, the average age of referral and surgery were 48.3 and 53.8 months, respectively, compared to 59.6 and 65.2 months at the urban center. Only 40% of patients at the rural site and 29% at the urban institution underwent intervention at less than 18 months of age. There was no significant difference in time of referral to surgery between the institutions. The majority of referrals were made by private practice pediatricians. Conclusion: In this study, a pattern of delayed referral and intervention was observed at both institutions despite differing geographic regions and heterogeneous patient populations. It is important that referring providers realize that scrotal U/S does not change management of UDT and should not delay prompt referral.What is known:• Significant referral delay is a challenging issue in the management of cryptorchidism.• Ultrasound is not a valid method for the detection of cryptorchidism.What is new:• The rural and urban management of cryptorchidism is not that different.• More emphasis should be put on the detection management of cryptorchidism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1067-1073
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Pediatrics
Volume176
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cryptorchidism
Compliance
Referral and Consultation
Private Practice
Gestational Age
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Cryptorchidism
  • Orchiopexy
  • Referral
  • Urban

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Rural versus urban compliance in the management of cryptorchidism : is there a difference? / Point, Dana; Morley, Chad; Tourchi, Ali; Reddy, Sunil; Sirisreetreerux, Pokket; Gearhart, John Phillip; Al-Omar, Osama.

In: European Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 176, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 1067-1073.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Point, D, Morley, C, Tourchi, A, Reddy, S, Sirisreetreerux, P, Gearhart, JP & Al-Omar, O 2017, 'Rural versus urban compliance in the management of cryptorchidism: is there a difference?', European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 176, no. 8, pp. 1067-1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2946-4
Point, Dana ; Morley, Chad ; Tourchi, Ali ; Reddy, Sunil ; Sirisreetreerux, Pokket ; Gearhart, John Phillip ; Al-Omar, Osama. / Rural versus urban compliance in the management of cryptorchidism : is there a difference?. In: European Journal of Pediatrics. 2017 ; Vol. 176, No. 8. pp. 1067-1073.
@article{3ff67b31ab864f2a8582d52577c9c6dd,
title = "Rural versus urban compliance in the management of cryptorchidism: is there a difference?",
abstract = "The authors compared the age and referral patterns of pediatric patients undergoing surgical intervention for cryptorchidism at a rural, West Virginia University, versus urban, Johns Hopkins University, tertiary center. A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical evaluation for cryptorchidism was performed. Patients treated for reasons unrelated to cryptorchidism or referred for multiple urologic diagnoses were excluded. The patients at each institution were then divided into four groups based on their corrected gestational age at time of surgery. Referral times and provider specialties were also obtained. A total of 131 cases at the urban center and 100 cases at the rural center were identified. At the rural center, the average age of referral and surgery were 48.3 and 53.8 months, respectively, compared to 59.6 and 65.2 months at the urban center. Only 40{\%} of patients at the rural site and 29{\%} at the urban institution underwent intervention at less than 18 months of age. There was no significant difference in time of referral to surgery between the institutions. The majority of referrals were made by private practice pediatricians. Conclusion: In this study, a pattern of delayed referral and intervention was observed at both institutions despite differing geographic regions and heterogeneous patient populations. It is important that referring providers realize that scrotal U/S does not change management of UDT and should not delay prompt referral.What is known:• Significant referral delay is a challenging issue in the management of cryptorchidism.• Ultrasound is not a valid method for the detection of cryptorchidism.What is new:• The rural and urban management of cryptorchidism is not that different.• More emphasis should be put on the detection management of cryptorchidism.",
keywords = "Cryptorchidism, Orchiopexy, Referral, Urban",
author = "Dana Point and Chad Morley and Ali Tourchi and Sunil Reddy and Pokket Sirisreetreerux and Gearhart, {John Phillip} and Osama Al-Omar",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00431-017-2946-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "1067--1073",
journal = "European Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "0340-6199",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural versus urban compliance in the management of cryptorchidism

T2 - is there a difference?

AU - Point, Dana

AU - Morley, Chad

AU - Tourchi, Ali

AU - Reddy, Sunil

AU - Sirisreetreerux, Pokket

AU - Gearhart, John Phillip

AU - Al-Omar, Osama

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - The authors compared the age and referral patterns of pediatric patients undergoing surgical intervention for cryptorchidism at a rural, West Virginia University, versus urban, Johns Hopkins University, tertiary center. A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical evaluation for cryptorchidism was performed. Patients treated for reasons unrelated to cryptorchidism or referred for multiple urologic diagnoses were excluded. The patients at each institution were then divided into four groups based on their corrected gestational age at time of surgery. Referral times and provider specialties were also obtained. A total of 131 cases at the urban center and 100 cases at the rural center were identified. At the rural center, the average age of referral and surgery were 48.3 and 53.8 months, respectively, compared to 59.6 and 65.2 months at the urban center. Only 40% of patients at the rural site and 29% at the urban institution underwent intervention at less than 18 months of age. There was no significant difference in time of referral to surgery between the institutions. The majority of referrals were made by private practice pediatricians. Conclusion: In this study, a pattern of delayed referral and intervention was observed at both institutions despite differing geographic regions and heterogeneous patient populations. It is important that referring providers realize that scrotal U/S does not change management of UDT and should not delay prompt referral.What is known:• Significant referral delay is a challenging issue in the management of cryptorchidism.• Ultrasound is not a valid method for the detection of cryptorchidism.What is new:• The rural and urban management of cryptorchidism is not that different.• More emphasis should be put on the detection management of cryptorchidism.

AB - The authors compared the age and referral patterns of pediatric patients undergoing surgical intervention for cryptorchidism at a rural, West Virginia University, versus urban, Johns Hopkins University, tertiary center. A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical evaluation for cryptorchidism was performed. Patients treated for reasons unrelated to cryptorchidism or referred for multiple urologic diagnoses were excluded. The patients at each institution were then divided into four groups based on their corrected gestational age at time of surgery. Referral times and provider specialties were also obtained. A total of 131 cases at the urban center and 100 cases at the rural center were identified. At the rural center, the average age of referral and surgery were 48.3 and 53.8 months, respectively, compared to 59.6 and 65.2 months at the urban center. Only 40% of patients at the rural site and 29% at the urban institution underwent intervention at less than 18 months of age. There was no significant difference in time of referral to surgery between the institutions. The majority of referrals were made by private practice pediatricians. Conclusion: In this study, a pattern of delayed referral and intervention was observed at both institutions despite differing geographic regions and heterogeneous patient populations. It is important that referring providers realize that scrotal U/S does not change management of UDT and should not delay prompt referral.What is known:• Significant referral delay is a challenging issue in the management of cryptorchidism.• Ultrasound is not a valid method for the detection of cryptorchidism.What is new:• The rural and urban management of cryptorchidism is not that different.• More emphasis should be put on the detection management of cryptorchidism.

KW - Cryptorchidism

KW - Orchiopexy

KW - Referral

KW - Urban

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021082902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021082902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00431-017-2946-4

DO - 10.1007/s00431-017-2946-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 28639144

AN - SCOPUS:85021082902

VL - 176

SP - 1067

EP - 1073

JO - European Journal of Pediatrics

JF - European Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 0340-6199

IS - 8

ER -