Rural hospital nursing: Results of a national survey of nurse executives

Robin P. Newhouse, Laura Morlock, Peter Pronovost, Sara Breckenridge Sproat

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe nursing characteristics in small and larger rural hospitals and determine whether differences exist in market, hospital, and nursing characteristics. BACKGROUND: A better description of nursing in rural settings is needed to understand the work context. METHODS: A national sample of rural hospital nurse executives (n ≤ 280) completed the Nurse Environment Survey and Essentials of Magnetism instrument. RESULTS: Larger rural hospitals are more likely than small hospitals to have a clinical ladder (32.4% vs 19.4%), more baccalaureate-prepared RNs (20.8% vs 17.1%), greater perceived economic (mean, 9.5 vs 8.5) and external influences (mean, 41.1 vs 39.8), lower shared vision among hospital staff (mean, 18.4 vs 19.4), and higher levels of quality and safety engagement (mean, 16.9 vs 16.1). Most nurses employed in rural hospitals are educated at the associate degree (77.4%) level. CONCLUSIONS: Contextual differences exist between small and larger rural hospitals. To promote the best patient outcomes, attention to contextual differences is needed to tailor nursing interventions to fit the resources, environment, and patient needs in a given healthcare setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-137
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nursing Administration
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'Rural hospital nursing: Results of a national survey of nurse executives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this