Routine pulmonary artery catheterization does not reduce morbidity and mortality of elective vascular surgery: Results of a prospective, randomized trial

Jeffrey S. Bender, Melissa A. Smith-Meek, Calvin E. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The authors determined whether the preoperative placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with optimization of hemodynamics results in outcome improvement after elective vascular surgery. Summary Background Data: The PAC commonly is used not only in patients who are critically ill, but also perioperatively in major elective surgery. Few prospective studies exist documenting its usefulness. Methods: One hundred four consecutive patients were randomized to have a PAC placed the morning of operation (group I) or to have a PAC placed only if clinically indicated (group II), Group I patients were resuscitated to preestablished endpoints before surgery and kept at these points both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Group II patients received standard care. Results: There was one death in each group. An intraoperative or postoperative complication developed in 13 patients in group I versus 7 patients in group II (p = not significant). Group I patients received more fluid than did group II patients (5137 ± 315 mL vs. 3789 ± 306 mL; p <0.003). There was no significant difference in either overall or surgical intensive care unit length of stay. Only one patient in group II required a postoperative PAC. Conclusions: Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to patients without demonstrable improvement in morbidity or mortality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-237
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume226
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Swan-Ganz Catheterization
Blood Vessels
Morbidity
Mortality
Pulmonary Artery
Catheters
Intraoperative Complications
Critical Care
Critical Illness
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Hemodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Routine pulmonary artery catheterization does not reduce morbidity and mortality of elective vascular surgery : Results of a prospective, randomized trial. / Bender, Jeffrey S.; Smith-Meek, Melissa A.; Jones, Calvin E.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 226, No. 3, 1997, p. 229-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49092d2f24b84e29b66b7640d8795fc8,
title = "Routine pulmonary artery catheterization does not reduce morbidity and mortality of elective vascular surgery: Results of a prospective, randomized trial",
abstract = "Objective: The authors determined whether the preoperative placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with optimization of hemodynamics results in outcome improvement after elective vascular surgery. Summary Background Data: The PAC commonly is used not only in patients who are critically ill, but also perioperatively in major elective surgery. Few prospective studies exist documenting its usefulness. Methods: One hundred four consecutive patients were randomized to have a PAC placed the morning of operation (group I) or to have a PAC placed only if clinically indicated (group II), Group I patients were resuscitated to preestablished endpoints before surgery and kept at these points both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Group II patients received standard care. Results: There was one death in each group. An intraoperative or postoperative complication developed in 13 patients in group I versus 7 patients in group II (p = not significant). Group I patients received more fluid than did group II patients (5137 ± 315 mL vs. 3789 ± 306 mL; p <0.003). There was no significant difference in either overall or surgical intensive care unit length of stay. Only one patient in group II required a postoperative PAC. Conclusions: Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to patients without demonstrable improvement in morbidity or mortality.",
author = "Bender, {Jeffrey S.} and Smith-Meek, {Melissa A.} and Jones, {Calvin E.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1097/00000658-199709000-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "226",
pages = "229--237",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine pulmonary artery catheterization does not reduce morbidity and mortality of elective vascular surgery

T2 - Results of a prospective, randomized trial

AU - Bender, Jeffrey S.

AU - Smith-Meek, Melissa A.

AU - Jones, Calvin E.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective: The authors determined whether the preoperative placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with optimization of hemodynamics results in outcome improvement after elective vascular surgery. Summary Background Data: The PAC commonly is used not only in patients who are critically ill, but also perioperatively in major elective surgery. Few prospective studies exist documenting its usefulness. Methods: One hundred four consecutive patients were randomized to have a PAC placed the morning of operation (group I) or to have a PAC placed only if clinically indicated (group II), Group I patients were resuscitated to preestablished endpoints before surgery and kept at these points both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Group II patients received standard care. Results: There was one death in each group. An intraoperative or postoperative complication developed in 13 patients in group I versus 7 patients in group II (p = not significant). Group I patients received more fluid than did group II patients (5137 ± 315 mL vs. 3789 ± 306 mL; p <0.003). There was no significant difference in either overall or surgical intensive care unit length of stay. Only one patient in group II required a postoperative PAC. Conclusions: Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to patients without demonstrable improvement in morbidity or mortality.

AB - Objective: The authors determined whether the preoperative placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with optimization of hemodynamics results in outcome improvement after elective vascular surgery. Summary Background Data: The PAC commonly is used not only in patients who are critically ill, but also perioperatively in major elective surgery. Few prospective studies exist documenting its usefulness. Methods: One hundred four consecutive patients were randomized to have a PAC placed the morning of operation (group I) or to have a PAC placed only if clinically indicated (group II), Group I patients were resuscitated to preestablished endpoints before surgery and kept at these points both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Group II patients received standard care. Results: There was one death in each group. An intraoperative or postoperative complication developed in 13 patients in group I versus 7 patients in group II (p = not significant). Group I patients received more fluid than did group II patients (5137 ± 315 mL vs. 3789 ± 306 mL; p <0.003). There was no significant difference in either overall or surgical intensive care unit length of stay. Only one patient in group II required a postoperative PAC. Conclusions: Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to patients without demonstrable improvement in morbidity or mortality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031419994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031419994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00002

DO - 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 9339929

AN - SCOPUS:0031419994

VL - 226

SP - 229

EP - 237

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 3

ER -