Roles of moral philosophy in appropriated bioethics: A response to Baker and McCullough

Jeremy Sugarman

doi:10.1353/ken.2007.0006

Roles of moral philosophy in appropriated bioethics: A response to Baker and McCullough

Jeremy Sugarman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Strong arguments support the notion that much of modern bioethics is a result of appropriation rather than strict application of traditional moral philosophy. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize these sources and approaches associated with them, even when working with appropriated theories, since traditional ethical theory does and should influence modern bioethics.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	65-67
Number of pages	3
Journal	Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Volume	17
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2007.0006
State	Published - Mar 2007
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Health(social science)
Health Policy
History and Philosophy of Science

Access to Document

10.1353/ken.2007.0006

Cite this

@article{40db1fb486f34699b4ae29d07a379c16,

title = "Roles of moral philosophy in appropriated bioethics: A response to Baker and McCullough",

abstract = "Strong arguments support the notion that much of modern bioethics is a result of appropriation rather than strict application of traditional moral philosophy. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize these sources and approaches associated with them, even when working with appropriated theories, since traditional ethical theory does and should influence modern bioethics.",

author = "Jeremy Sugarman",

year = "2007",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1353/ken.2007.0006",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "17",

pages = "65--67",

journal = "Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal",

issn = "1054-6863",

publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roles of moral philosophy in appropriated bioethics

T2 - A response to Baker and McCullough

AU - Sugarman, Jeremy

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Strong arguments support the notion that much of modern bioethics is a result of appropriation rather than strict application of traditional moral philosophy. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize these sources and approaches associated with them, even when working with appropriated theories, since traditional ethical theory does and should influence modern bioethics.

AB - Strong arguments support the notion that much of modern bioethics is a result of appropriation rather than strict application of traditional moral philosophy. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize these sources and approaches associated with them, even when working with appropriated theories, since traditional ethical theory does and should influence modern bioethics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147112831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147112831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/ken.2007.0006

DO - 10.1353/ken.2007.0006

M3 - Article

C2 - 17849665

AN - SCOPUS:34147112831

SN - 1054-6863

VL - 17

SP - 65

EP - 67

JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal

JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal

IS - 1

ER -

Roles of moral philosophy in appropriated bioethics: A response to Baker and McCullough

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this