Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis

Henry A. Pitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent years, several less invasive procedures have challenged the preeminence of open choledochotomy in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Alternatives now include endoscopic sphincterotomy, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, percutaneous transhepatic stone extraction, and laparoscopic common duct exploration. In deciding whether an alternative is appropriate for an individual patient, factors to consider include the following: (1) the presence or absence of the gallbladder; (2) the severity of the presenting symptoms; (3) the results of open choledochotomy; and (4) local endoscopic, radiologic, and laparoscopic expertise. Review of available data suggests that endoscopic spincteroplasty is appropriate for older patients without a gallbladder and for those with severe toxic cholangitis. However, endoscopic sphincterotomy has not been proven to be worth-while before open surgery. Open choledochotomy has been reported to have a mortality rate of less than 2%, leaving fewer than 5% of patients with retained stones. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treatment algorithms for patients with common duct stones have seldom included open choledochotomy. However, future prospective, randomized trials of the management of patients with choledocholithiasis should include open choledochotomy as the gold standard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-486
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume165
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Choledocholithiasis
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy
Gallbladder
Therapeutics
Cholangitis
Lithotripsy
Poisons
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Shock
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. / Pitt, Henry A.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 165, No. 4, 1993, p. 483-486.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8ba69cbcad6043dab25454c83a0be159,
title = "Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis",
abstract = "In recent years, several less invasive procedures have challenged the preeminence of open choledochotomy in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Alternatives now include endoscopic sphincterotomy, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, percutaneous transhepatic stone extraction, and laparoscopic common duct exploration. In deciding whether an alternative is appropriate for an individual patient, factors to consider include the following: (1) the presence or absence of the gallbladder; (2) the severity of the presenting symptoms; (3) the results of open choledochotomy; and (4) local endoscopic, radiologic, and laparoscopic expertise. Review of available data suggests that endoscopic spincteroplasty is appropriate for older patients without a gallbladder and for those with severe toxic cholangitis. However, endoscopic sphincterotomy has not been proven to be worth-while before open surgery. Open choledochotomy has been reported to have a mortality rate of less than 2{\%}, leaving fewer than 5{\%} of patients with retained stones. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treatment algorithms for patients with common duct stones have seldom included open choledochotomy. However, future prospective, randomized trials of the management of patients with choledocholithiasis should include open choledochotomy as the gold standard.",
author = "Pitt, {Henry A.}",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80946-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "165",
pages = "483--486",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of open choledochotomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis

AU - Pitt, Henry A.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - In recent years, several less invasive procedures have challenged the preeminence of open choledochotomy in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Alternatives now include endoscopic sphincterotomy, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, percutaneous transhepatic stone extraction, and laparoscopic common duct exploration. In deciding whether an alternative is appropriate for an individual patient, factors to consider include the following: (1) the presence or absence of the gallbladder; (2) the severity of the presenting symptoms; (3) the results of open choledochotomy; and (4) local endoscopic, radiologic, and laparoscopic expertise. Review of available data suggests that endoscopic spincteroplasty is appropriate for older patients without a gallbladder and for those with severe toxic cholangitis. However, endoscopic sphincterotomy has not been proven to be worth-while before open surgery. Open choledochotomy has been reported to have a mortality rate of less than 2%, leaving fewer than 5% of patients with retained stones. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treatment algorithms for patients with common duct stones have seldom included open choledochotomy. However, future prospective, randomized trials of the management of patients with choledocholithiasis should include open choledochotomy as the gold standard.

AB - In recent years, several less invasive procedures have challenged the preeminence of open choledochotomy in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Alternatives now include endoscopic sphincterotomy, extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, percutaneous transhepatic stone extraction, and laparoscopic common duct exploration. In deciding whether an alternative is appropriate for an individual patient, factors to consider include the following: (1) the presence or absence of the gallbladder; (2) the severity of the presenting symptoms; (3) the results of open choledochotomy; and (4) local endoscopic, radiologic, and laparoscopic expertise. Review of available data suggests that endoscopic spincteroplasty is appropriate for older patients without a gallbladder and for those with severe toxic cholangitis. However, endoscopic sphincterotomy has not been proven to be worth-while before open surgery. Open choledochotomy has been reported to have a mortality rate of less than 2%, leaving fewer than 5% of patients with retained stones. Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, treatment algorithms for patients with common duct stones have seldom included open choledochotomy. However, future prospective, randomized trials of the management of patients with choledocholithiasis should include open choledochotomy as the gold standard.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027203037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027203037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80946-8

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80946-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 8480887

AN - SCOPUS:0027203037

VL - 165

SP - 483

EP - 486

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -