Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites.

Linda X. Jin, Andrew M. Ibrahim, Naeem A. Newman, Danil V. Makarov, Peter J. Pronovost, Martin A Makary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To examine the prevalence and content of robotic surgery information presented on websites of U.S. hospitals. We completed a systematic analysis of 400 randomly selected U.S. hospital websites in June of 2010. Data were collected on the presence and location of robotic surgery information on a hospital's website; use of images or text provided by the manufacturer; use of direct link to manufacturer website; statements of clinical superiority; statements of improved cancer outcome; mention of a comparison group for a statement; citation of supporting data and mention of specific risks. Forty-one percent of hospital websites described robotic surgery. Among these, 37% percent presented robotic surgery on their homepage, 73% used manufacturer-provided stock images or text, and 33% linked to a manufacturer website. Statements of clinical superiority were made on 86% of websites, with 32% describing improved cancer control, and 2% described a reference group. No hospital website mentioned risks. Materials provided by hospitals regarding the surgical robot overestimate benefits, largely ignore risks and are strongly influenced by the manufacturer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-52
Number of pages5
JournalJournal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Volume33
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

State Hospitals
Robotics
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. / Jin, Linda X.; Ibrahim, Andrew M.; Newman, Naeem A.; Makarov, Danil V.; Pronovost, Peter J.; Makary, Martin A.

In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, Vol. 33, No. 6, 11.2011, p. 48-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jin, Linda X. ; Ibrahim, Andrew M. ; Newman, Naeem A. ; Makarov, Danil V. ; Pronovost, Peter J. ; Makary, Martin A. / Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites. In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 48-52.
@article{b464be7259c74a3ea0e53015190bc5e9,
title = "Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites.",
abstract = "To examine the prevalence and content of robotic surgery information presented on websites of U.S. hospitals. We completed a systematic analysis of 400 randomly selected U.S. hospital websites in June of 2010. Data were collected on the presence and location of robotic surgery information on a hospital's website; use of images or text provided by the manufacturer; use of direct link to manufacturer website; statements of clinical superiority; statements of improved cancer outcome; mention of a comparison group for a statement; citation of supporting data and mention of specific risks. Forty-one percent of hospital websites described robotic surgery. Among these, 37{\%} percent presented robotic surgery on their homepage, 73{\%} used manufacturer-provided stock images or text, and 33{\%} linked to a manufacturer website. Statements of clinical superiority were made on 86{\%} of websites, with 32{\%} describing improved cancer control, and 2{\%} described a reference group. No hospital website mentioned risks. Materials provided by hospitals regarding the surgical robot overestimate benefits, largely ignore risks and are strongly influenced by the manufacturer.",
author = "Jin, {Linda X.} and Ibrahim, {Andrew M.} and Newman, {Naeem A.} and Makarov, {Danil V.} and Pronovost, {Peter J.} and Makary, {Martin A}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "48--52",
journal = "Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality",
issn = "1062-2551",
publisher = "National Association for Healthcare Quality",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic surgery claims on United States hospital websites.

AU - Jin, Linda X.

AU - Ibrahim, Andrew M.

AU - Newman, Naeem A.

AU - Makarov, Danil V.

AU - Pronovost, Peter J.

AU - Makary, Martin A

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - To examine the prevalence and content of robotic surgery information presented on websites of U.S. hospitals. We completed a systematic analysis of 400 randomly selected U.S. hospital websites in June of 2010. Data were collected on the presence and location of robotic surgery information on a hospital's website; use of images or text provided by the manufacturer; use of direct link to manufacturer website; statements of clinical superiority; statements of improved cancer outcome; mention of a comparison group for a statement; citation of supporting data and mention of specific risks. Forty-one percent of hospital websites described robotic surgery. Among these, 37% percent presented robotic surgery on their homepage, 73% used manufacturer-provided stock images or text, and 33% linked to a manufacturer website. Statements of clinical superiority were made on 86% of websites, with 32% describing improved cancer control, and 2% described a reference group. No hospital website mentioned risks. Materials provided by hospitals regarding the surgical robot overestimate benefits, largely ignore risks and are strongly influenced by the manufacturer.

AB - To examine the prevalence and content of robotic surgery information presented on websites of U.S. hospitals. We completed a systematic analysis of 400 randomly selected U.S. hospital websites in June of 2010. Data were collected on the presence and location of robotic surgery information on a hospital's website; use of images or text provided by the manufacturer; use of direct link to manufacturer website; statements of clinical superiority; statements of improved cancer outcome; mention of a comparison group for a statement; citation of supporting data and mention of specific risks. Forty-one percent of hospital websites described robotic surgery. Among these, 37% percent presented robotic surgery on their homepage, 73% used manufacturer-provided stock images or text, and 33% linked to a manufacturer website. Statements of clinical superiority were made on 86% of websites, with 32% describing improved cancer control, and 2% described a reference group. No hospital website mentioned risks. Materials provided by hospitals regarding the surgical robot overestimate benefits, largely ignore risks and are strongly influenced by the manufacturer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856848076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856848076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 48

EP - 52

JO - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

JF - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

SN - 1062-2551

IS - 6

ER -