Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: Comparison with standard manual access

Li Ming Su, Dan Stoianovici, Thomas W. Jarrett, Alexandru Patriciu, William W. Roberts, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu, Sanjay Ramakumar, Stephen B. Solomon, Louis R. Kavoussi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of robotic percutaneous access to the kidney (PAKY) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in comparison with conventional manual techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the intraoperative access variables (number of access attempts, time to successful access, estimated blood loss, complications) of 23 patients who underwent robotic PAKY with the remote center of motion device (PAKY-RCM) with the same data from a contemporaneous series of 23 patients who underwent conventional manual percutaneous access to the kidney. The PAKY-RCM incorporates a robotic arm and a friction transmission with axial loading system to accurately position and insert a standard 18-gauge needle percutaneously into the kidney. The blood loss during percutaneous access was estimated on a four-point scale (1 = minimal to 4 = large). The color of effluent urine was graded on a four-point scale (1 = clear to 4 = red). Results: The mean target calix width was 13.5 ± 9.2 mm in the robotic group and 12.2 ± 4.5 mm in the manual group (P = 0.57). When comparing PAKY-RCM with standard manual techniques, the mean number of attempts was 2.2 ± 1.6 v 3.2 ± 2.5 (P = 0.14), time to access was 10.4 ± 6.5 minutes v 15.1 ± 8.8 minutes (P = 0.06), estimated blood loss score was 1.3 ± 0.49 v 1.7 ± 0.66 (P = 0.14), and color of effluent urine following access was 2.0 ± 0.90 v 2.1 ± 0.7 (P = 0.82). The PAKY-RCM was successful in obtaining access in 87% (20 of 23) of cases. The other three patients (13%) required conversion to manual techniques. There were no major intraoperative complications in either group. Conclusions: Robotic PAKY is a feasible, safe, and efficacious method of obtaining renal access for nephrolithotomy. The number of attempts and time to access were comparable to those of standard manual percutaneous access techniques. These findings provide the groundwork for the development of a completely automated robot-assisted percutaneous renal access device.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-475
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume16
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Robotics
Kidney
Color
Urine
Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Equipment and Supplies
Friction
Intraoperative Complications
Weight-Bearing
Needles
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Su, L. M., Stoianovici, D., Jarrett, T. W., Patriciu, A., Roberts, W. W., Cadeddu, J. A., ... Kavoussi, L. R. (2002). Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: Comparison with standard manual access. Journal of Endourology, 16(7), 471-475.

Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney : Comparison with standard manual access. / Su, Li Ming; Stoianovici, Dan; Jarrett, Thomas W.; Patriciu, Alexandru; Roberts, William W.; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.; Ramakumar, Sanjay; Solomon, Stephen B.; Kavoussi, Louis R.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2002, p. 471-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Su, LM, Stoianovici, D, Jarrett, TW, Patriciu, A, Roberts, WW, Cadeddu, JA, Ramakumar, S, Solomon, SB & Kavoussi, LR 2002, 'Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: Comparison with standard manual access', Journal of Endourology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 471-475.
Su LM, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW, Patriciu A, Roberts WW, Cadeddu JA et al. Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: Comparison with standard manual access. Journal of Endourology. 2002;16(7):471-475.
Su, Li Ming ; Stoianovici, Dan ; Jarrett, Thomas W. ; Patriciu, Alexandru ; Roberts, William W. ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ; Ramakumar, Sanjay ; Solomon, Stephen B. ; Kavoussi, Louis R. / Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney : Comparison with standard manual access. In: Journal of Endourology. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 471-475.
@article{8c4864ce126f45f7bdc059ba141ab816,
title = "Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: Comparison with standard manual access",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of robotic percutaneous access to the kidney (PAKY) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in comparison with conventional manual techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the intraoperative access variables (number of access attempts, time to successful access, estimated blood loss, complications) of 23 patients who underwent robotic PAKY with the remote center of motion device (PAKY-RCM) with the same data from a contemporaneous series of 23 patients who underwent conventional manual percutaneous access to the kidney. The PAKY-RCM incorporates a robotic arm and a friction transmission with axial loading system to accurately position and insert a standard 18-gauge needle percutaneously into the kidney. The blood loss during percutaneous access was estimated on a four-point scale (1 = minimal to 4 = large). The color of effluent urine was graded on a four-point scale (1 = clear to 4 = red). Results: The mean target calix width was 13.5 ± 9.2 mm in the robotic group and 12.2 ± 4.5 mm in the manual group (P = 0.57). When comparing PAKY-RCM with standard manual techniques, the mean number of attempts was 2.2 ± 1.6 v 3.2 ± 2.5 (P = 0.14), time to access was 10.4 ± 6.5 minutes v 15.1 ± 8.8 minutes (P = 0.06), estimated blood loss score was 1.3 ± 0.49 v 1.7 ± 0.66 (P = 0.14), and color of effluent urine following access was 2.0 ± 0.90 v 2.1 ± 0.7 (P = 0.82). The PAKY-RCM was successful in obtaining access in 87{\%} (20 of 23) of cases. The other three patients (13{\%}) required conversion to manual techniques. There were no major intraoperative complications in either group. Conclusions: Robotic PAKY is a feasible, safe, and efficacious method of obtaining renal access for nephrolithotomy. The number of attempts and time to access were comparable to those of standard manual percutaneous access techniques. These findings provide the groundwork for the development of a completely automated robot-assisted percutaneous renal access device.",
author = "Su, {Li Ming} and Dan Stoianovici and Jarrett, {Thomas W.} and Alexandru Patriciu and Roberts, {William W.} and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A.} and Sanjay Ramakumar and Solomon, {Stephen B.} and Kavoussi, {Louis R.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "471--475",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney

T2 - Comparison with standard manual access

AU - Su, Li Ming

AU - Stoianovici, Dan

AU - Jarrett, Thomas W.

AU - Patriciu, Alexandru

AU - Roberts, William W.

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.

AU - Ramakumar, Sanjay

AU - Solomon, Stephen B.

AU - Kavoussi, Louis R.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of robotic percutaneous access to the kidney (PAKY) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in comparison with conventional manual techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the intraoperative access variables (number of access attempts, time to successful access, estimated blood loss, complications) of 23 patients who underwent robotic PAKY with the remote center of motion device (PAKY-RCM) with the same data from a contemporaneous series of 23 patients who underwent conventional manual percutaneous access to the kidney. The PAKY-RCM incorporates a robotic arm and a friction transmission with axial loading system to accurately position and insert a standard 18-gauge needle percutaneously into the kidney. The blood loss during percutaneous access was estimated on a four-point scale (1 = minimal to 4 = large). The color of effluent urine was graded on a four-point scale (1 = clear to 4 = red). Results: The mean target calix width was 13.5 ± 9.2 mm in the robotic group and 12.2 ± 4.5 mm in the manual group (P = 0.57). When comparing PAKY-RCM with standard manual techniques, the mean number of attempts was 2.2 ± 1.6 v 3.2 ± 2.5 (P = 0.14), time to access was 10.4 ± 6.5 minutes v 15.1 ± 8.8 minutes (P = 0.06), estimated blood loss score was 1.3 ± 0.49 v 1.7 ± 0.66 (P = 0.14), and color of effluent urine following access was 2.0 ± 0.90 v 2.1 ± 0.7 (P = 0.82). The PAKY-RCM was successful in obtaining access in 87% (20 of 23) of cases. The other three patients (13%) required conversion to manual techniques. There were no major intraoperative complications in either group. Conclusions: Robotic PAKY is a feasible, safe, and efficacious method of obtaining renal access for nephrolithotomy. The number of attempts and time to access were comparable to those of standard manual percutaneous access techniques. These findings provide the groundwork for the development of a completely automated robot-assisted percutaneous renal access device.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency, accuracy, and safety of robotic percutaneous access to the kidney (PAKY) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in comparison with conventional manual techniques. Materials and Methods: We compared the intraoperative access variables (number of access attempts, time to successful access, estimated blood loss, complications) of 23 patients who underwent robotic PAKY with the remote center of motion device (PAKY-RCM) with the same data from a contemporaneous series of 23 patients who underwent conventional manual percutaneous access to the kidney. The PAKY-RCM incorporates a robotic arm and a friction transmission with axial loading system to accurately position and insert a standard 18-gauge needle percutaneously into the kidney. The blood loss during percutaneous access was estimated on a four-point scale (1 = minimal to 4 = large). The color of effluent urine was graded on a four-point scale (1 = clear to 4 = red). Results: The mean target calix width was 13.5 ± 9.2 mm in the robotic group and 12.2 ± 4.5 mm in the manual group (P = 0.57). When comparing PAKY-RCM with standard manual techniques, the mean number of attempts was 2.2 ± 1.6 v 3.2 ± 2.5 (P = 0.14), time to access was 10.4 ± 6.5 minutes v 15.1 ± 8.8 minutes (P = 0.06), estimated blood loss score was 1.3 ± 0.49 v 1.7 ± 0.66 (P = 0.14), and color of effluent urine following access was 2.0 ± 0.90 v 2.1 ± 0.7 (P = 0.82). The PAKY-RCM was successful in obtaining access in 87% (20 of 23) of cases. The other three patients (13%) required conversion to manual techniques. There were no major intraoperative complications in either group. Conclusions: Robotic PAKY is a feasible, safe, and efficacious method of obtaining renal access for nephrolithotomy. The number of attempts and time to access were comparable to those of standard manual percutaneous access techniques. These findings provide the groundwork for the development of a completely automated robot-assisted percutaneous renal access device.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036393465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036393465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12396439

AN - SCOPUS:0036393465

VL - 16

SP - 471

EP - 475

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 7

ER -