Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Erich Lang, Raju Thomas, Ronald Davis, Ivan Colon, Mohamad E Allaf, Amer Hanano, Alexander Kagen, Erum Sethi, Kirsten Emery, Ernest Rudman, Leann Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To establish the efficacy of nephrolithotripsy via intercostal access route vs subcostal access route with respect to attained stone-free status, operating time, and complications. Methods: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsies via the upper pole were performed in 142 patients (93 male, 49 female, age 24-78 years) from 1998 to 2005 at our 4 academic medical centers. Selection criteria for nephrolithotripsy via upper pole access were staghorn calculi ≥5.5 cm3, upper pole calyx calculi ≥2.5 cm, and abnormal or high lying kidney, often in combination with obesity. Of 68 staghorn calculi, 49 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route. Of 57 upper calyx calculi 38 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route; all calculi in the upper ureter considered easily accessible via the intercostal route. Results: Of 103 patients with intercostal access, 91 attained a stone-free status. There were 4 major and 6 minor complications. Depending on stone location, mean operating times varied from 42 to 152 minutes. Of 39 patients in whom a subcostal access route was chosen, 29 were made stone-free. There were 3 major and 8 minor complications. The mean operating time varied from 108 to 145 minutes. Conclusions: The significantly higher rate of achieving stone-free status, lower rate of complications, and markedly reduced operating time when using intercostal access make this the route of choice for upper pole nephrolithotripsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)751-755
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Calculi
Ureter
Patient Selection
Obesity
Kidney
Staghorn Calculi

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy. / Lang, Erich; Thomas, Raju; Davis, Ronald; Colon, Ivan; Allaf, Mohamad E; Hanano, Amer; Kagen, Alexander; Sethi, Erum; Emery, Kirsten; Rudman, Ernest; Myers, Leann.

In: Urology, Vol. 74, No. 4, 10.2009, p. 751-755.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lang, E, Thomas, R, Davis, R, Colon, I, Allaf, ME, Hanano, A, Kagen, A, Sethi, E, Emery, K, Rudman, E & Myers, L 2009, 'Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy', Urology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 751-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.087
Lang, Erich ; Thomas, Raju ; Davis, Ronald ; Colon, Ivan ; Allaf, Mohamad E ; Hanano, Amer ; Kagen, Alexander ; Sethi, Erum ; Emery, Kirsten ; Rudman, Ernest ; Myers, Leann. / Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy. In: Urology. 2009 ; Vol. 74, No. 4. pp. 751-755.
@article{dcaf600bead14d6c9b3753871996d549,
title = "Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy",
abstract = "Objectives: To establish the efficacy of nephrolithotripsy via intercostal access route vs subcostal access route with respect to attained stone-free status, operating time, and complications. Methods: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsies via the upper pole were performed in 142 patients (93 male, 49 female, age 24-78 years) from 1998 to 2005 at our 4 academic medical centers. Selection criteria for nephrolithotripsy via upper pole access were staghorn calculi ≥5.5 cm3, upper pole calyx calculi ≥2.5 cm, and abnormal or high lying kidney, often in combination with obesity. Of 68 staghorn calculi, 49 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route. Of 57 upper calyx calculi 38 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route; all calculi in the upper ureter considered easily accessible via the intercostal route. Results: Of 103 patients with intercostal access, 91 attained a stone-free status. There were 4 major and 6 minor complications. Depending on stone location, mean operating times varied from 42 to 152 minutes. Of 39 patients in whom a subcostal access route was chosen, 29 were made stone-free. There were 3 major and 8 minor complications. The mean operating time varied from 108 to 145 minutes. Conclusions: The significantly higher rate of achieving stone-free status, lower rate of complications, and markedly reduced operating time when using intercostal access make this the route of choice for upper pole nephrolithotripsy.",
author = "Erich Lang and Raju Thomas and Ronald Davis and Ivan Colon and Allaf, {Mohamad E} and Amer Hanano and Alexander Kagen and Erum Sethi and Kirsten Emery and Ernest Rudman and Leann Myers",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "751--755",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

AU - Lang, Erich

AU - Thomas, Raju

AU - Davis, Ronald

AU - Colon, Ivan

AU - Allaf, Mohamad E

AU - Hanano, Amer

AU - Kagen, Alexander

AU - Sethi, Erum

AU - Emery, Kirsten

AU - Rudman, Ernest

AU - Myers, Leann

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Objectives: To establish the efficacy of nephrolithotripsy via intercostal access route vs subcostal access route with respect to attained stone-free status, operating time, and complications. Methods: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsies via the upper pole were performed in 142 patients (93 male, 49 female, age 24-78 years) from 1998 to 2005 at our 4 academic medical centers. Selection criteria for nephrolithotripsy via upper pole access were staghorn calculi ≥5.5 cm3, upper pole calyx calculi ≥2.5 cm, and abnormal or high lying kidney, often in combination with obesity. Of 68 staghorn calculi, 49 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route. Of 57 upper calyx calculi 38 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route; all calculi in the upper ureter considered easily accessible via the intercostal route. Results: Of 103 patients with intercostal access, 91 attained a stone-free status. There were 4 major and 6 minor complications. Depending on stone location, mean operating times varied from 42 to 152 minutes. Of 39 patients in whom a subcostal access route was chosen, 29 were made stone-free. There were 3 major and 8 minor complications. The mean operating time varied from 108 to 145 minutes. Conclusions: The significantly higher rate of achieving stone-free status, lower rate of complications, and markedly reduced operating time when using intercostal access make this the route of choice for upper pole nephrolithotripsy.

AB - Objectives: To establish the efficacy of nephrolithotripsy via intercostal access route vs subcostal access route with respect to attained stone-free status, operating time, and complications. Methods: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsies via the upper pole were performed in 142 patients (93 male, 49 female, age 24-78 years) from 1998 to 2005 at our 4 academic medical centers. Selection criteria for nephrolithotripsy via upper pole access were staghorn calculi ≥5.5 cm3, upper pole calyx calculi ≥2.5 cm, and abnormal or high lying kidney, often in combination with obesity. Of 68 staghorn calculi, 49 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route. Of 57 upper calyx calculi 38 were accessed via intercostal and 19 via subcostal route; all calculi in the upper ureter considered easily accessible via the intercostal route. Results: Of 103 patients with intercostal access, 91 attained a stone-free status. There were 4 major and 6 minor complications. Depending on stone location, mean operating times varied from 42 to 152 minutes. Of 39 patients in whom a subcostal access route was chosen, 29 were made stone-free. There were 3 major and 8 minor complications. The mean operating time varied from 108 to 145 minutes. Conclusions: The significantly higher rate of achieving stone-free status, lower rate of complications, and markedly reduced operating time when using intercostal access make this the route of choice for upper pole nephrolithotripsy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349437311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349437311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.087

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.087

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 751

EP - 755

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 4

ER -