TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk prediction tool for grade re-classification in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance
AU - Mamawala, Mufaddal M.
AU - Rao, Karthik
AU - Landis, Patricia
AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.
AU - Trock, Bruce J.
AU - Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
AU - Pienta, Kenneth J.
AU - Carter, H. Ballentine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Objective: To create a nomogram for men on active surveillance (AS) for prediction of grade re-classification (GR) above Gleason score 6 (Grade group >2) at surveillance biopsy. Patients and Methods: From a cohort of men enrolled in an AS programme, a multivariable model was used to identify clinical and pathological parameters predictive of GR. Nomogram performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: Of 1 374 men, 254 (18.50%) were re-classified to Gleason ≥7 on surveillance prostate biopsy. Variables predictive of GR were earlier year of diagnosis [≤2004 vs ≥2005; odds ratio (OR) 2.16, P < 0.001], older age (OR 1.05, P < 0.001), higher prostate-specific antigen density [OR 1.19 (per 0.1 unit increase), P = 0.04], bilateral disease (OR 2.86, P < 0.001), risk strata (low-risk vs very-low-risk, OR 1.79, P < 0.001), and total number of biopsies without GR (OR 0.68, P < 0.001). On internal validation, a nomogram created using the multivariable model had an area under the curve of 0.757 (95% confidence interval 0.730–0.797) for predicting GR at the time of next surveillance biopsy. Conclusion: The nomogram described is currently being used at each return visit to assess the need for a surveillance biopsy, and could increase retention in AS.
AB - Objective: To create a nomogram for men on active surveillance (AS) for prediction of grade re-classification (GR) above Gleason score 6 (Grade group >2) at surveillance biopsy. Patients and Methods: From a cohort of men enrolled in an AS programme, a multivariable model was used to identify clinical and pathological parameters predictive of GR. Nomogram performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: Of 1 374 men, 254 (18.50%) were re-classified to Gleason ≥7 on surveillance prostate biopsy. Variables predictive of GR were earlier year of diagnosis [≤2004 vs ≥2005; odds ratio (OR) 2.16, P < 0.001], older age (OR 1.05, P < 0.001), higher prostate-specific antigen density [OR 1.19 (per 0.1 unit increase), P = 0.04], bilateral disease (OR 2.86, P < 0.001), risk strata (low-risk vs very-low-risk, OR 1.79, P < 0.001), and total number of biopsies without GR (OR 0.68, P < 0.001). On internal validation, a nomogram created using the multivariable model had an area under the curve of 0.757 (95% confidence interval 0.730–0.797) for predicting GR at the time of next surveillance biopsy. Conclusion: The nomogram described is currently being used at each return visit to assess the need for a surveillance biopsy, and could increase retention in AS.
KW - active surveillance
KW - grade re-classification
KW - prediction nomogram
KW - prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992027437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992027437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bju.13608
DO - 10.1111/bju.13608
M3 - Article
C2 - 27469419
AN - SCOPUS:84992027437
VL - 120
SP - 25
EP - 31
JO - BJU International
JF - BJU International
SN - 1464-4096
IS - 1
ER -