Risk Implications of the New CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Equation Compared With the MDRD Study Equation for Estimated GFR: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Kunihiro Matsushita, Elizabeth Selvin, Lori D. Bash, Brad C. Astor, Josef Coresh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) recently published an equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the same variables (serum creatinine level, age, sex, and race) as the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation. Although the CKD-EPI equation estimates GFR more precisely compared with the MDRD Study equation, whether this equation improves risk prediction is unknown. Study Design: Prospective cohort study, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Setting & Participants: 13,905 middle-aged participants without a history of cardiovascular disease with median follow-up of 16.9 years. Predictor: eGFR. Outcomes & Measurements: We compared the association of eGFR in categories (≥120, 90-119, 60-89, 30-59, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) using the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations with risk of incident end-stage renal disease, all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease, and stroke. Results: The median value for eGFRCKD-EPI was higher than that for eGFRMDRD (97.6 vs 88.8 mL/min/1.73 m2; P < 0.001). The CKD-EPI equation reclassified 44.9% (n = 3,079) and 43.5% (n = 151) of participants with eGFRMDRD of 60-89 and 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, upward to a higher eGFR category, but reclassified no one with eGFRMDRD of 90-119 or <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, decreasing the prevalence of CKD stages 3-5 from 2.7% to 1.6%. Participants with eGFRMDRD of 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2 who were reclassified upward had lower risk compared with those who were not reclassified (end-stage renal disease incidence rate ratio, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.33]; all-cause mortality, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.19-0.48]; coronary heart disease, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.21-0.61]; and stroke, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.24-1.02]). Similar results were observed for participants with eGFRMDRD of 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2. More frequent reclassification of younger, female, and white participants explained some of these trends. Net reclassification improvement in participants with eGFR < 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 was positive for all outcomes (P < 0.001). Limitations: Limited number of cases with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and no measurement of albuminuria. Conclusions: The CKD-EPI equation more appropriately categorized individuals with respect to long-term clinical risk compared with the MDRD Study equation, suggesting improved clinical usefulness in this middle-aged population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)648-659
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Keywords

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate
  • cardiovascular disease
  • end-stage renal disease
  • epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Implications of the New CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Equation Compared With the MDRD Study Equation for Estimated GFR: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this