Risk factors for injuries in landslide- and flood-affected populations in Uganda.

Shreya Agrawal, Tisha Gopalakrishnan, Yuri Gorokhovich, Shannon Doocy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The frequency of occurrence of natural disasters has increased over the past several decades, which necessitates a better understanding of human vulnerability, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper assesses risk factors for injury in the March 2010 floods and landslides in Eastern Uganda, and compares the effects of location, injury type, and severity. A stratified cluster survey of the disaster-affected populations was conducted five months after onset of the disasters. Probability proportional to size sampling was used to sample 800 households, including 400 affected by floods in Butaleja District and 400 affected by landslides in Bududa District. Flood- and landslide-affected populations were surveyed in July 2010 using a stratified cluster design. The odds of injury were 65% higher in the flood-affected groups than the landslide-affected groups in a logistic regression (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; P <.001). The injury rate was greater in individuals under 42 years of age, and location of injury was a contributing factor. More people were injured in the flood-affected population as compared with the landslide-affected population, and injuries were more severe. This study illustrates differences between populations injured by flood and landslide disasters that occurred simultaneously in Eastern Uganda in 2010. In areas where landslides are prone to occur due to massive rainfalls or floods, preventative measures, such as early warning systems and evacuation, are more likely to increase the likelihood of people surviving, while for areas with massive floods, immediate and effective medical attention can save lives and improve injury outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-321
Number of pages8
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Landslides
Uganda
Wounds and Injuries
Disasters
Population
Logistic Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Risk factors for injuries in landslide- and flood-affected populations in Uganda. / Agrawal, Shreya; Gopalakrishnan, Tisha; Gorokhovich, Yuri; Doocy, Shannon.

In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 314-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agrawal, Shreya ; Gopalakrishnan, Tisha ; Gorokhovich, Yuri ; Doocy, Shannon. / Risk factors for injuries in landslide- and flood-affected populations in Uganda. In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 314-321.
@article{cbe7e912138e43bd9d83e85fb668eb54,
title = "Risk factors for injuries in landslide- and flood-affected populations in Uganda.",
abstract = "The frequency of occurrence of natural disasters has increased over the past several decades, which necessitates a better understanding of human vulnerability, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper assesses risk factors for injury in the March 2010 floods and landslides in Eastern Uganda, and compares the effects of location, injury type, and severity. A stratified cluster survey of the disaster-affected populations was conducted five months after onset of the disasters. Probability proportional to size sampling was used to sample 800 households, including 400 affected by floods in Butaleja District and 400 affected by landslides in Bududa District. Flood- and landslide-affected populations were surveyed in July 2010 using a stratified cluster design. The odds of injury were 65{\%} higher in the flood-affected groups than the landslide-affected groups in a logistic regression (OR = 0.35; 95{\%} CI, 0.24-0.52; P <.001). The injury rate was greater in individuals under 42 years of age, and location of injury was a contributing factor. More people were injured in the flood-affected population as compared with the landslide-affected population, and injuries were more severe. This study illustrates differences between populations injured by flood and landslide disasters that occurred simultaneously in Eastern Uganda in 2010. In areas where landslides are prone to occur due to massive rainfalls or floods, preventative measures, such as early warning systems and evacuation, are more likely to increase the likelihood of people surviving, while for areas with massive floods, immediate and effective medical attention can save lives and improve injury outcomes.",
author = "Shreya Agrawal and Tisha Gopalakrishnan and Yuri Gorokhovich and Shannon Doocy",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S1049023X13000356",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "314--321",
journal = "Prehospital and Disaster Medicine",
issn = "1049-023X",
publisher = "World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors for injuries in landslide- and flood-affected populations in Uganda.

AU - Agrawal, Shreya

AU - Gopalakrishnan, Tisha

AU - Gorokhovich, Yuri

AU - Doocy, Shannon

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The frequency of occurrence of natural disasters has increased over the past several decades, which necessitates a better understanding of human vulnerability, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper assesses risk factors for injury in the March 2010 floods and landslides in Eastern Uganda, and compares the effects of location, injury type, and severity. A stratified cluster survey of the disaster-affected populations was conducted five months after onset of the disasters. Probability proportional to size sampling was used to sample 800 households, including 400 affected by floods in Butaleja District and 400 affected by landslides in Bududa District. Flood- and landslide-affected populations were surveyed in July 2010 using a stratified cluster design. The odds of injury were 65% higher in the flood-affected groups than the landslide-affected groups in a logistic regression (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; P <.001). The injury rate was greater in individuals under 42 years of age, and location of injury was a contributing factor. More people were injured in the flood-affected population as compared with the landslide-affected population, and injuries were more severe. This study illustrates differences between populations injured by flood and landslide disasters that occurred simultaneously in Eastern Uganda in 2010. In areas where landslides are prone to occur due to massive rainfalls or floods, preventative measures, such as early warning systems and evacuation, are more likely to increase the likelihood of people surviving, while for areas with massive floods, immediate and effective medical attention can save lives and improve injury outcomes.

AB - The frequency of occurrence of natural disasters has increased over the past several decades, which necessitates a better understanding of human vulnerability, particularly in low-resource settings. This paper assesses risk factors for injury in the March 2010 floods and landslides in Eastern Uganda, and compares the effects of location, injury type, and severity. A stratified cluster survey of the disaster-affected populations was conducted five months after onset of the disasters. Probability proportional to size sampling was used to sample 800 households, including 400 affected by floods in Butaleja District and 400 affected by landslides in Bududa District. Flood- and landslide-affected populations were surveyed in July 2010 using a stratified cluster design. The odds of injury were 65% higher in the flood-affected groups than the landslide-affected groups in a logistic regression (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.52; P <.001). The injury rate was greater in individuals under 42 years of age, and location of injury was a contributing factor. More people were injured in the flood-affected population as compared with the landslide-affected population, and injuries were more severe. This study illustrates differences between populations injured by flood and landslide disasters that occurred simultaneously in Eastern Uganda in 2010. In areas where landslides are prone to occur due to massive rainfalls or floods, preventative measures, such as early warning systems and evacuation, are more likely to increase the likelihood of people surviving, while for areas with massive floods, immediate and effective medical attention can save lives and improve injury outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886781798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886781798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X13000356

DO - 10.1017/S1049023X13000356

M3 - Article

C2 - 23746361

AN - SCOPUS:84886781798

VL - 28

SP - 314

EP - 321

JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

SN - 1049-023X

IS - 4

ER -