TY - JOUR
T1 - Rifampin and pyrazinamide vs isoniazid for prevention of tuberculosis in HIV-infected persons
T2 - An international randomized trial
AU - Gordin, Fred
AU - Chaisson, Richard E.
AU - Matts, John P.
AU - Miller, Carol
AU - De Lourdes Garcia, Maria
AU - Hafner, Richard
AU - Valdespino, Jose Luis
AU - Coberly, Jacqueline
AU - Schechter, Mauro
AU - Klukowicz, Alan J.
AU - Barry, M. Anita
AU - O'Brien, Richard J.
PY - 2000/3/15
Y1 - 2000/3/15
N2 - Context: Because of problems with adherence, toxicity, and increasing resistance associated with 6- to 12-month isoniazid regimens, an alternative short-course tuberculosis preventive regimen is needed. Objective: To compare a 2-month regimen of daily rifampin and pyrazinamide with a 12-month regimen of daily isoniazid in preventing tuberculosis in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Design: Randomized, open-label controlled trial conducted from September 1991 to May 1996, with follow-up through October 1997. Setting: Outpatient clinics in the United States, Mexico, Hafti, and Brazil. Participants: A total of 1583 HIV-positive persons aged 13 years or older with a positive tuberculin skin test result. Interventions: Patients were randomized to isoniazid, 300 mg/d, with pyridoxine hydrochloride for 12 months (n = 792) or rifampin, 600 mg/d, and pyrazinamide, 20 mg/kg per day, for 2 months (n = 791). Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was culture-confirmed tuberculosis; secondary end points were proven or probable tuberculosis, adverse events, and death, compared by treatment group. Results: Of patients assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide, 80% completed the regimen compared with 69% assigned to isoniazid (P < .001). After a mean follow-up of 37 months, 19 patients (2.4%) assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide and 26 (3.3%) assigned to isoniazid developed confirmed tuberculosis at rates of 0.8 and 1.1 per 100 person- years, respectively (risk ratio, 0,72 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.31]; P = .28). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in rates for confirmed or probable tuberculosis (P = .83), HIV progression and/or death (P = .09), or overall adverse events (P=.27), although drug discontinuation was slightly higher in the rifampin and pyrazinamide group (P = .01). Neither regimen appeared to lead to the development of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Conclusions: Our data suggest that for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients, a daily 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide is similar in safety and efficacy to a daily 12-month regimen of isoniazid. This shorter regimen offers practical advantages to both patients and tuberculosis control programs.
AB - Context: Because of problems with adherence, toxicity, and increasing resistance associated with 6- to 12-month isoniazid regimens, an alternative short-course tuberculosis preventive regimen is needed. Objective: To compare a 2-month regimen of daily rifampin and pyrazinamide with a 12-month regimen of daily isoniazid in preventing tuberculosis in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Design: Randomized, open-label controlled trial conducted from September 1991 to May 1996, with follow-up through October 1997. Setting: Outpatient clinics in the United States, Mexico, Hafti, and Brazil. Participants: A total of 1583 HIV-positive persons aged 13 years or older with a positive tuberculin skin test result. Interventions: Patients were randomized to isoniazid, 300 mg/d, with pyridoxine hydrochloride for 12 months (n = 792) or rifampin, 600 mg/d, and pyrazinamide, 20 mg/kg per day, for 2 months (n = 791). Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was culture-confirmed tuberculosis; secondary end points were proven or probable tuberculosis, adverse events, and death, compared by treatment group. Results: Of patients assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide, 80% completed the regimen compared with 69% assigned to isoniazid (P < .001). After a mean follow-up of 37 months, 19 patients (2.4%) assigned to rifampin and pyrazinamide and 26 (3.3%) assigned to isoniazid developed confirmed tuberculosis at rates of 0.8 and 1.1 per 100 person- years, respectively (risk ratio, 0,72 [95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.31]; P = .28). In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in rates for confirmed or probable tuberculosis (P = .83), HIV progression and/or death (P = .09), or overall adverse events (P=.27), although drug discontinuation was slightly higher in the rifampin and pyrazinamide group (P = .01). Neither regimen appeared to lead to the development of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Conclusions: Our data suggest that for preventing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients, a daily 2-month regimen of rifampin and pyrazinamide is similar in safety and efficacy to a daily 12-month regimen of isoniazid. This shorter regimen offers practical advantages to both patients and tuberculosis control programs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007487795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007487795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jama.283.11.1445
DO - 10.1001/jama.283.11.1445
M3 - Article
C2 - 10732934
AN - SCOPUS:0007487795
SN - 0098-7484
VL - 283
SP - 1445
EP - 1450
JO - JAMA
JF - JAMA
IS - 11
ER -