Revisiting the minimum wage-employment debate: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

David Neumark, John Michael Ian Salas, William Wascher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors revisit the long-running minimum wage-employment debate to assess new studies claiming that estimates produced by the panel data approach commonly used in recent minimum wage research are flawed by that approach's failure to account for spatial heterogeneity. The new studies use research designs intended to control for this heterogeneity and conclude that minimum wages in the United States have not reduced employment. The authors explore the ability of the new research designs to isolate reliable identifying information, and they test the designs' untested assumptions about the construction of better control groups. Their analysis reveals problems with the new research designs. Moreover, using methods that let the data identify the appropriate control groups, their results reaffirm the evidence of disemployment effects, with teen employment elasticities near -0.15. This evidence, they conclude, still shows that minimum wages pose a tradeoff of higher wages for some against job losses for others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)608-648
Number of pages41
JournalIndustrial and Labor Relations Review
Volume67
Issue numberSUPPL
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wages
Elasticity
Minimum wage
Research design

Keywords

  • Minimum wage effect
  • Spatial heterogeneity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Revisiting the minimum wage-employment debate : Throwing out the baby with the bathwater? / Neumark, David; Salas, John Michael Ian; Wascher, William.

In: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 67, No. SUPPL, 2014, p. 608-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f90e54ee5bfb4ba7830b405750d199ee,
title = "Revisiting the minimum wage-employment debate: Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?",
abstract = "The authors revisit the long-running minimum wage-employment debate to assess new studies claiming that estimates produced by the panel data approach commonly used in recent minimum wage research are flawed by that approach's failure to account for spatial heterogeneity. The new studies use research designs intended to control for this heterogeneity and conclude that minimum wages in the United States have not reduced employment. The authors explore the ability of the new research designs to isolate reliable identifying information, and they test the designs' untested assumptions about the construction of better control groups. Their analysis reveals problems with the new research designs. Moreover, using methods that let the data identify the appropriate control groups, their results reaffirm the evidence of disemployment effects, with teen employment elasticities near -0.15. This evidence, they conclude, still shows that minimum wages pose a tradeoff of higher wages for some against job losses for others.",
keywords = "Minimum wage effect, Spatial heterogeneity",
author = "David Neumark and Salas, {John Michael Ian} and William Wascher",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "608--648",
journal = "ILR Review",
issn = "0019-7939",
publisher = "Cornell University",
number = "SUPPL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the minimum wage-employment debate

T2 - Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?

AU - Neumark, David

AU - Salas, John Michael Ian

AU - Wascher, William

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The authors revisit the long-running minimum wage-employment debate to assess new studies claiming that estimates produced by the panel data approach commonly used in recent minimum wage research are flawed by that approach's failure to account for spatial heterogeneity. The new studies use research designs intended to control for this heterogeneity and conclude that minimum wages in the United States have not reduced employment. The authors explore the ability of the new research designs to isolate reliable identifying information, and they test the designs' untested assumptions about the construction of better control groups. Their analysis reveals problems with the new research designs. Moreover, using methods that let the data identify the appropriate control groups, their results reaffirm the evidence of disemployment effects, with teen employment elasticities near -0.15. This evidence, they conclude, still shows that minimum wages pose a tradeoff of higher wages for some against job losses for others.

AB - The authors revisit the long-running minimum wage-employment debate to assess new studies claiming that estimates produced by the panel data approach commonly used in recent minimum wage research are flawed by that approach's failure to account for spatial heterogeneity. The new studies use research designs intended to control for this heterogeneity and conclude that minimum wages in the United States have not reduced employment. The authors explore the ability of the new research designs to isolate reliable identifying information, and they test the designs' untested assumptions about the construction of better control groups. Their analysis reveals problems with the new research designs. Moreover, using methods that let the data identify the appropriate control groups, their results reaffirm the evidence of disemployment effects, with teen employment elasticities near -0.15. This evidence, they conclude, still shows that minimum wages pose a tradeoff of higher wages for some against job losses for others.

KW - Minimum wage effect

KW - Spatial heterogeneity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904024070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904024070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904024070

VL - 67

SP - 608

EP - 648

JO - ILR Review

JF - ILR Review

SN - 0019-7939

IS - SUPPL

ER -