Review of Russell's (1975) norms for the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale

Bruce Crosson; Carroll W. Hughes; David L. Roth; Paul G. Monkowski

doi:10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.635

Review of Russell's (1975) norms for the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale

Bruce Crosson, Carroll W. Hughes, David L. Roth, Paul G. Monkowski

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reviews and critiques the system for administering and scoring the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale presented by E. W. Russell (see record 1976-08657-001). Innovations (e.g., obtaining a delayed recall) are considered useful; however, impairment ratings for Logical Memory classify too many nonneurological Ss from other studies as impaired. A short-term alternative to Russell's scoring categories is suggested, using data from 3 studies. A long-term solution requires a more detailed system that can be reliably used between different locations so that more adequate norms will evolve. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	635-641
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume	52
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.635
State	Published - Aug 1 1984
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Visual Reproduction subtests of Wechsler Memory Scale, neurological Ss
critique of E. W. Russell's system for administration &
review &
scoring of Logical Memory &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Clinical Psychology
Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.635

Cite this

@article{a13ef193d431408b8bd83b1d95215514,

title = "Review of Russell's (1975) norms for the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale",

abstract = "Reviews and critiques the system for administering and scoring the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale presented by E. W. Russell (see record 1976-08657-001). Innovations (e.g., obtaining a delayed recall) are considered useful; however, impairment ratings for Logical Memory classify too many nonneurological Ss from other studies as impaired. A short-term alternative to Russell's scoring categories is suggested, using data from 3 studies. A long-term solution requires a more detailed system that can be reliably used between different locations so that more adequate norms will evolve. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",

keywords = "Visual Reproduction subtests of Wechsler Memory Scale, neurological Ss, critique of E. W. Russell's system for administration &, review &, scoring of Logical Memory &",

author = "Bruce Crosson and Hughes, {Carroll W.} and Roth, {David L.} and Monkowski, {Paul G.}",

year = "1984",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.635",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "52",

pages = "635--641",

journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",

issn = "0022-006X",

publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of Russell's (1975) norms for the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale

AU - Crosson, Bruce

AU - Hughes, Carroll W.

AU - Roth, David L.

AU - Monkowski, Paul G.

PY - 1984/8/1

Y1 - 1984/8/1

N2 - Reviews and critiques the system for administering and scoring the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale presented by E. W. Russell (see record 1976-08657-001). Innovations (e.g., obtaining a delayed recall) are considered useful; however, impairment ratings for Logical Memory classify too many nonneurological Ss from other studies as impaired. A short-term alternative to Russell's scoring categories is suggested, using data from 3 studies. A long-term solution requires a more detailed system that can be reliably used between different locations so that more adequate norms will evolve. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Reviews and critiques the system for administering and scoring the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale presented by E. W. Russell (see record 1976-08657-001). Innovations (e.g., obtaining a delayed recall) are considered useful; however, impairment ratings for Logical Memory classify too many nonneurological Ss from other studies as impaired. A short-term alternative to Russell's scoring categories is suggested, using data from 3 studies. A long-term solution requires a more detailed system that can be reliably used between different locations so that more adequate norms will evolve. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - Visual Reproduction subtests of Wechsler Memory Scale, neurological Ss

KW - critique of E. W. Russell's system for administration &

KW - review &

KW - scoring of Logical Memory &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021471532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021471532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.635

DO - 10.1037/0022-006X.52.4.635

M3 - Article

C2 - 6470289

AN - SCOPUS:0021471532

SN - 0022-006X

VL - 52

SP - 635

EP - 641

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

IS - 4

ER -

Review of Russell's (1975) norms for the Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this