TY - JOUR
T1 - Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Amblyopic Eyes
AU - Repka, Michael X.
AU - Goldenberg-Cohen, Nitza
AU - Edwards, Allison R.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/8
Y1 - 2006/8
N2 - Purpose: To compare the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness of sound and amblyopic eyes. Design: Prospective observational case series. Methods: setting: Institutional. study population: Patients with unilateral strabismic, anisometropic, or combined amblyopia. observation: Fast RNFL analysis with ocular coherence tomography (OCT) of sound and amblyopic eyes. measure: Mean RNFL thickness. Results: For the 17 patients (mean age 10.7 years) in whom both eyes were imaged, the mean thickness of the sound eye was 109.2 μm (median 112.7) and of the amblyopic eye was 104.2 μm (median 105.0), and the average difference (sound eye less amblyopic eye) was 5.0 μm (median 3.0) (95% confidence interval -2.3, 12.2, P = .17). The sound eye was 10 μm or more thicker than the amblyopic eye in four patients; the amblyopic eye was 10 μm or more thicker than the sound eye in one patient; and the difference was within 10 μm in 12 patients. Test-retest data were obtained for 23 pairs of sound eyes and 21 pairs of amblyopic eyes, with 75% of the test-retest pairs within 7%. Conclusions: We found a small, but not clinically significant, difference in nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness between amblyopic and sound eyes. Reliability was excellent, with most eyes testing within 7% of the first test.
AB - Purpose: To compare the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness of sound and amblyopic eyes. Design: Prospective observational case series. Methods: setting: Institutional. study population: Patients with unilateral strabismic, anisometropic, or combined amblyopia. observation: Fast RNFL analysis with ocular coherence tomography (OCT) of sound and amblyopic eyes. measure: Mean RNFL thickness. Results: For the 17 patients (mean age 10.7 years) in whom both eyes were imaged, the mean thickness of the sound eye was 109.2 μm (median 112.7) and of the amblyopic eye was 104.2 μm (median 105.0), and the average difference (sound eye less amblyopic eye) was 5.0 μm (median 3.0) (95% confidence interval -2.3, 12.2, P = .17). The sound eye was 10 μm or more thicker than the amblyopic eye in four patients; the amblyopic eye was 10 μm or more thicker than the sound eye in one patient; and the difference was within 10 μm in 12 patients. Test-retest data were obtained for 23 pairs of sound eyes and 21 pairs of amblyopic eyes, with 75% of the test-retest pairs within 7%. Conclusions: We found a small, but not clinically significant, difference in nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness between amblyopic and sound eyes. Reliability was excellent, with most eyes testing within 7% of the first test.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746302614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746302614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 16876504
AN - SCOPUS:33746302614
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 142
SP - 247-251.e2
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
IS - 2
ER -