Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies

Kirstin R.W. Matthews, Ana S. Iltis, Nuria Gallego Marquez, Daniel S. Wagner, Jason Scott Robert, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Marieke Bigg, Sarah Franklin, Soren Holm, Ingrid Metzler, Matteo A. Molè, Jochen Taupitz, Giuseppe Testa, Jeremy Sugarman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It now seems technically feasible to culture human embryos beyond the “fourteen-day limit,” which has the potential to increase scientific understanding of human development and perhaps improve infertility treatments. The fourteen-day limit was adopted as a compromise but subsequently has been considered an ethical line. Does it remain relevant in light of technological advances permitting embryo maturation beyond it? Should it be changed and, if so, how and why? What justifications would be necessary to expand the limit, particularly given that doing so would violate some people's moral commitments regarding human embryos? Robust stakeholder engagement preceded adoption of the fourteen-day limit and should arguably be part of efforts to reassess it. Such engagement could also consider the need for enhanced oversight of human embryo research. In the meantime, developing and implementing reliable oversight systems should help foster high-quality research and public confidence in it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-51
Number of pages5
JournalHastings Center Report
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

Keywords

  • embryo
  • fourteen-day limit
  • guidelines
  • policy
  • research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this