Resting metabolic rate in old-old women with and without frailty: Variability and estimation of energy requirements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives To measure resting metabolic rate (RMR) in old-old adults living in the community and examine the association between measured RMR and frailty status and compare it with expected RMR generated by a predictive equation. Design Physiological substudy conducted as a home visit within an observational cohort study. Setting Baltimore City and County, Maryland. Participants Seventy-seven women aged 83 to 93 enrolled in the Women's Health and Aging Study II. Measurements Resting metabolic rate with indirect calorimetry, frailty status, fat-free mass, ambient and body temperature, expected RMR according to the Mifflin-St. Jeor equation. Results Average RMR was 1,119 ± 205 kcal/d (range 595-1,560 kcal/d). Agreement between observed and expected RMR was biased and poor (between-subject coefficient of variation 38.0%, 95% confidence interval = 35.1-40.8). Variability of RMR was greater in frail individuals (heteroscedasticity F-test P =.02). Low and high RMR were associated with being frail (odds ratio 5.4, P =.04) and slower self-selected walking speed (P <.001) after adjustment for covariates. Conclusion Equations to predict RMR that are not validated in old-old adults appear to correlate poorly with measured RMR. RMR is highly variable in old-old women, with deviations from the mean predicting clinical frailty. These exploratory findings suggest a pathway to clinical frailty through high or low RMR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1695-1700
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume60
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Keywords

  • frailty
  • older adults
  • resting metabolic rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Resting metabolic rate in old-old women with and without frailty: Variability and estimation of energy requirements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this