Response to letter to the editor: “All models are wrong; some models are useful”

Antje Arnold; Fausto Rodriguez; Charles G. Eberhart; Eric H. Raabe

doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa137

Response to letter to the editor: “All models are wrong; some models are useful”

Antje Arnold, Fausto Rodriguez, Charles G. Eberhart, Eric H. Raabe

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1406-1407
Number of pages	2
Journal	Neuro-oncology
Volume	22
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa137
State	Published - Sep 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Oncology
Clinical Neurology
Cancer Research

Access to Document

10.1093/neuonc/noaa137

Cite this

@article{7d359c2000d74736beb6b4b116817cf2,

title = "Response to letter to the editor: “All models are wrong; some models are useful”",

author = "Antje Arnold and Fausto Rodriguez and Eberhart, {Charles G.} and Raabe, {Eric H.}",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/neuonc/noaa137",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "22",

pages = "1406--1407",

journal = "Neuro-oncology",

issn = "1522-8517",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to letter to the editor

T2 - “All models are wrong; some models are useful”

AU - Arnold, Antje

AU - Rodriguez, Fausto

AU - Eberhart, Charles G.

AU - Raabe, Eric H.

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092332133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092332133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/neuonc/noaa137

DO - 10.1093/neuonc/noaa137

M3 - Letter

C2 - 32597469

AN - SCOPUS:85092332133

SN - 1522-8517

VL - 22

SP - 1406

EP - 1407

JO - Neuro-oncology

JF - Neuro-oncology

IS - 9

ER -

Response to letter to the editor: “All models are wrong; some models are useful”

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this