Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement

Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings

Dorothea C. Lerman, Brian A. Iwata, Bridget A. Shore, Sung Woo Kahng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Results of basic research have demonstrated that behavior maintained on an intermittent schedule of reinforcement (INT) will be extinguished more slowly than behavior maintained on a continuous schedule (CRF). Although these findings suggest that problem behaviors may be difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than on CRF schedules, few applied studies have examined this phenomenon with human behavior in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether problem behavior maintained on CRF schedules would be extinguished more rapidly than behavior maintained on INT schedules. Three individuals diagnosed with profound mental retardation participated after results of pretreatment functional analyses had identified the sources of reinforcement that were maintaining their self-injury, aggression, or disruption. Subjects were exposed to extinction following baseline conditions with CRF or INT schedules alternated within reversal or multielement designs. Results suggested that problem behaviors may not be more difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than CRF schedules. However, switching from an INT to a CRF schedule prior to extinction may lower the baseline response rate as well as the total number of responses exhibited during extinction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-171
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume29
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reinforcement
Appointments and Schedules
Reinforcement Schedule
basic research
Psychological Extinction
Problem Behavior
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Behavior Problems
Reinforcement
Extinction
Aggression
Intellectual Disability
aggression
iodonitrotetrazolium
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Disruption
  • Extinction
  • Intermittent reinforcement
  • Partial-reinforcement extinction effect
  • Reinforcement schedule
  • Resistance to extinction
  • Self-injurious behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement : Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings. / Lerman, Dorothea C.; Iwata, Brian A.; Shore, Bridget A.; Kahng, Sung Woo.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 2, 06.1996, p. 153-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lerman, Dorothea C. ; Iwata, Brian A. ; Shore, Bridget A. ; Kahng, Sung Woo. / Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement : Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings. In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1996 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 153-171.
@article{e753425d255544ce9d53934059d4419f,
title = "Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings",
abstract = "Results of basic research have demonstrated that behavior maintained on an intermittent schedule of reinforcement (INT) will be extinguished more slowly than behavior maintained on a continuous schedule (CRF). Although these findings suggest that problem behaviors may be difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than on CRF schedules, few applied studies have examined this phenomenon with human behavior in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether problem behavior maintained on CRF schedules would be extinguished more rapidly than behavior maintained on INT schedules. Three individuals diagnosed with profound mental retardation participated after results of pretreatment functional analyses had identified the sources of reinforcement that were maintaining their self-injury, aggression, or disruption. Subjects were exposed to extinction following baseline conditions with CRF or INT schedules alternated within reversal or multielement designs. Results suggested that problem behaviors may not be more difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than CRF schedules. However, switching from an INT to a CRF schedule prior to extinction may lower the baseline response rate as well as the total number of responses exhibited during extinction.",
keywords = "Aggression, Disruption, Extinction, Intermittent reinforcement, Partial-reinforcement extinction effect, Reinforcement schedule, Resistance to extinction, Self-injurious behavior",
author = "Lerman, {Dorothea C.} and Iwata, {Brian A.} and Shore, {Bridget A.} and Kahng, {Sung Woo}",
year = "1996",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "153--171",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement

T2 - Implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings

AU - Lerman, Dorothea C.

AU - Iwata, Brian A.

AU - Shore, Bridget A.

AU - Kahng, Sung Woo

PY - 1996/6

Y1 - 1996/6

N2 - Results of basic research have demonstrated that behavior maintained on an intermittent schedule of reinforcement (INT) will be extinguished more slowly than behavior maintained on a continuous schedule (CRF). Although these findings suggest that problem behaviors may be difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than on CRF schedules, few applied studies have examined this phenomenon with human behavior in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether problem behavior maintained on CRF schedules would be extinguished more rapidly than behavior maintained on INT schedules. Three individuals diagnosed with profound mental retardation participated after results of pretreatment functional analyses had identified the sources of reinforcement that were maintaining their self-injury, aggression, or disruption. Subjects were exposed to extinction following baseline conditions with CRF or INT schedules alternated within reversal or multielement designs. Results suggested that problem behaviors may not be more difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than CRF schedules. However, switching from an INT to a CRF schedule prior to extinction may lower the baseline response rate as well as the total number of responses exhibited during extinction.

AB - Results of basic research have demonstrated that behavior maintained on an intermittent schedule of reinforcement (INT) will be extinguished more slowly than behavior maintained on a continuous schedule (CRF). Although these findings suggest that problem behaviors may be difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than on CRF schedules, few applied studies have examined this phenomenon with human behavior in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether problem behavior maintained on CRF schedules would be extinguished more rapidly than behavior maintained on INT schedules. Three individuals diagnosed with profound mental retardation participated after results of pretreatment functional analyses had identified the sources of reinforcement that were maintaining their self-injury, aggression, or disruption. Subjects were exposed to extinction following baseline conditions with CRF or INT schedules alternated within reversal or multielement designs. Results suggested that problem behaviors may not be more difficult to treat with extinction if they have been maintained on INT rather than CRF schedules. However, switching from an INT to a CRF schedule prior to extinction may lower the baseline response rate as well as the total number of responses exhibited during extinction.

KW - Aggression

KW - Disruption

KW - Extinction

KW - Intermittent reinforcement

KW - Partial-reinforcement extinction effect

KW - Reinforcement schedule

KW - Resistance to extinction

KW - Self-injurious behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030160510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030160510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 153

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 2

ER -