Respiratory syncytial virus detection by remel Xpect, Binax Now RSV, direct immunofluorescent staining, and tissue culture

Anita P. Borek, Susan H. Clemens, Valerie K. Gaskins, Deborah Z. Aird, Alexandra Valsamakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The performance characteristics of Xpect RSV (XP) and Binax Now RSV (BN) were compared to those of direct fluorescent-antibody staining and/or tissue culture for detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in nasopharyngeal aspirate and wash samples from children (n = 110) and adults (n = 66). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of XP were 75%, 98%, 95%, and 90%, respectively; and those of BN were 74%, 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. The performances of the assays were similar within a given age group and specimen type (nasopharyngeal aspirate or wash specimen). XP and BN are useful for screening for RSV in respiratory specimens when large volumes are tested or low levels of staffing occur.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1105-1107
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of clinical microbiology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Respiratory syncytial virus detection by remel Xpect, Binax Now RSV, direct immunofluorescent staining, and tissue culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this