Resource allocation in phonological working memory: Same or different principles from vision?

Christopher R. Hepner, Nazbanou Nozari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The nature of working memory resources—in particular, their quantization (discrete vs. continuous)—has been studied extensively in the visual domain, with evidence supporting models with flexibly and continuously divisible resources. It remains unclear, however, whether similar mechanisms mediate the division of resources in phonological working memory. In three experiments, we show that, despite representational differences between visual and auditory domains, the principles of resource division are indeed similar in these domains. Exp. 1 tests slot vs. resource models, Exp. 2 gauges the effect of attention on resource division, and Exp. 3 investigates the influence of attention on different stages of working memory. Collectively, the results provide support for a resource model of phonological working memory and, more generally, point to similar computational principles governing the allocation of working memory resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Resource Allocation
Short-Term Memory
Resource allocation
Data storage equipment
resources
Gages
Resources
Working Memory
experiment
Experiments
evidence

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Central executive
  • Cognitive resources
  • Domain-generality
  • Phonological working memory
  • Resource models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Resource allocation in phonological working memory : Same or different principles from vision? / Hepner, Christopher R.; Nozari, Nazbanou.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b44d056b36534d7aa85a8a8db7e9a67a,
title = "Resource allocation in phonological working memory: Same or different principles from vision?",
abstract = "The nature of working memory resources—in particular, their quantization (discrete vs. continuous)—has been studied extensively in the visual domain, with evidence supporting models with flexibly and continuously divisible resources. It remains unclear, however, whether similar mechanisms mediate the division of resources in phonological working memory. In three experiments, we show that, despite representational differences between visual and auditory domains, the principles of resource division are indeed similar in these domains. Exp. 1 tests slot vs. resource models, Exp. 2 gauges the effect of attention on resource division, and Exp. 3 investigates the influence of attention on different stages of working memory. Collectively, the results provide support for a resource model of phonological working memory and, more generally, point to similar computational principles governing the allocation of working memory resources.",
keywords = "Attention, Central executive, Cognitive resources, Domain-generality, Phonological working memory, Resource models",
author = "Hepner, {Christopher R.} and Nazbanou Nozari",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource allocation in phonological working memory

T2 - Same or different principles from vision?

AU - Hepner, Christopher R.

AU - Nozari, Nazbanou

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The nature of working memory resources—in particular, their quantization (discrete vs. continuous)—has been studied extensively in the visual domain, with evidence supporting models with flexibly and continuously divisible resources. It remains unclear, however, whether similar mechanisms mediate the division of resources in phonological working memory. In three experiments, we show that, despite representational differences between visual and auditory domains, the principles of resource division are indeed similar in these domains. Exp. 1 tests slot vs. resource models, Exp. 2 gauges the effect of attention on resource division, and Exp. 3 investigates the influence of attention on different stages of working memory. Collectively, the results provide support for a resource model of phonological working memory and, more generally, point to similar computational principles governing the allocation of working memory resources.

AB - The nature of working memory resources—in particular, their quantization (discrete vs. continuous)—has been studied extensively in the visual domain, with evidence supporting models with flexibly and continuously divisible resources. It remains unclear, however, whether similar mechanisms mediate the division of resources in phonological working memory. In three experiments, we show that, despite representational differences between visual and auditory domains, the principles of resource division are indeed similar in these domains. Exp. 1 tests slot vs. resource models, Exp. 2 gauges the effect of attention on resource division, and Exp. 3 investigates the influence of attention on different stages of working memory. Collectively, the results provide support for a resource model of phonological working memory and, more generally, point to similar computational principles governing the allocation of working memory resources.

KW - Attention

KW - Central executive

KW - Cognitive resources

KW - Domain-generality

KW - Phonological working memory

KW - Resource models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062598945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062598945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2019.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062598945

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

ER -