Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants

A multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature

Sammy Sinno, Karan Mehta, Lee Squitieri, Kavitha Ranganathan, Michael S. Koeckert, Ashit Patel, Pierre B. Saadeh, Vishal Thanik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose The National Residency Matching Program Match is a very unique process in which applicants and programs are coupled to each other based on a ranking system. Although several studies have assessed features plastic surgery programs look for in applicants, no study in the present plastic surgery literature identifies which residency characteristics are most important to plastic surgery applicants. Therefore, we sought to perform a multi-institutional assessment as to which factors plastic surgery residency applicants consider most important when applying for residency. Methods A validated and anonymous questionnaire containing 37 items regarding various program characteristics was e-mailed to 226 applicants to New York University, Albany, University of Michigan, and University of Southern California plastic surgery residency programs. Applicants were asked to rate each feature on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most important. The 37 variables were ranked by the sum of the responses. The median rating and interquartile range as well as the mean for each factor was then calculated. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare medians in rank order. Results A total of 137 completed questionnaires were returned, yielding a 61% response rate. The characteristics candidates considered most important were impressions during the interview, experiences during away rotations, importance placed on resident training/support/mentoring by faculty, personal experiences with residents, and the amount of time spent in general surgery. The characteristics candidates considered least important were second-look experiences, compensation/benefits, program reputation from Internet forums, accessibility of program coordinator, opportunity for laboratory research, and fellowship positions available at the program. Conclusions Applicants value personal contact and time spent in general surgery when selecting residency programs. As the number of integrated programs continues to grow, programs will benefit from learning what factors their applicants value most.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-717
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of plastic surgery
Volume74
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 26 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Internship and Residency
Training Support
Health Services Accessibility
Nonparametric Statistics
Internet
Learning
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • applicant
  • application
  • away rotation
  • integrated residency
  • interview
  • match
  • match process
  • match program
  • medical school
  • plastic surgery
  • questionnaire
  • residency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants : A multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature. / Sinno, Sammy; Mehta, Karan; Squitieri, Lee; Ranganathan, Kavitha; Koeckert, Michael S.; Patel, Ashit; Saadeh, Pierre B.; Thanik, Vishal.

In: Annals of plastic surgery, Vol. 74, No. 6, 26.06.2015, p. 713-717.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sinno, Sammy ; Mehta, Karan ; Squitieri, Lee ; Ranganathan, Kavitha ; Koeckert, Michael S. ; Patel, Ashit ; Saadeh, Pierre B. ; Thanik, Vishal. / Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants : A multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature. In: Annals of plastic surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 74, No. 6. pp. 713-717.
@article{93237bd952bd4a79b9fed9b3d7e4ac96,
title = "Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants: A multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature",
abstract = "Purpose The National Residency Matching Program Match is a very unique process in which applicants and programs are coupled to each other based on a ranking system. Although several studies have assessed features plastic surgery programs look for in applicants, no study in the present plastic surgery literature identifies which residency characteristics are most important to plastic surgery applicants. Therefore, we sought to perform a multi-institutional assessment as to which factors plastic surgery residency applicants consider most important when applying for residency. Methods A validated and anonymous questionnaire containing 37 items regarding various program characteristics was e-mailed to 226 applicants to New York University, Albany, University of Michigan, and University of Southern California plastic surgery residency programs. Applicants were asked to rate each feature on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most important. The 37 variables were ranked by the sum of the responses. The median rating and interquartile range as well as the mean for each factor was then calculated. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare medians in rank order. Results A total of 137 completed questionnaires were returned, yielding a 61{\%} response rate. The characteristics candidates considered most important were impressions during the interview, experiences during away rotations, importance placed on resident training/support/mentoring by faculty, personal experiences with residents, and the amount of time spent in general surgery. The characteristics candidates considered least important were second-look experiences, compensation/benefits, program reputation from Internet forums, accessibility of program coordinator, opportunity for laboratory research, and fellowship positions available at the program. Conclusions Applicants value personal contact and time spent in general surgery when selecting residency programs. As the number of integrated programs continues to grow, programs will benefit from learning what factors their applicants value most.",
keywords = "applicant, application, away rotation, integrated residency, interview, match, match process, match program, medical school, plastic surgery, questionnaire, residency",
author = "Sammy Sinno and Karan Mehta and Lee Squitieri and Kavitha Ranganathan and Koeckert, {Michael S.} and Ashit Patel and Saadeh, {Pierre B.} and Vishal Thanik",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1097/SAP.0000000000000511",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "713--717",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants

T2 - A multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature

AU - Sinno, Sammy

AU - Mehta, Karan

AU - Squitieri, Lee

AU - Ranganathan, Kavitha

AU - Koeckert, Michael S.

AU - Patel, Ashit

AU - Saadeh, Pierre B.

AU - Thanik, Vishal

PY - 2015/6/26

Y1 - 2015/6/26

N2 - Purpose The National Residency Matching Program Match is a very unique process in which applicants and programs are coupled to each other based on a ranking system. Although several studies have assessed features plastic surgery programs look for in applicants, no study in the present plastic surgery literature identifies which residency characteristics are most important to plastic surgery applicants. Therefore, we sought to perform a multi-institutional assessment as to which factors plastic surgery residency applicants consider most important when applying for residency. Methods A validated and anonymous questionnaire containing 37 items regarding various program characteristics was e-mailed to 226 applicants to New York University, Albany, University of Michigan, and University of Southern California plastic surgery residency programs. Applicants were asked to rate each feature on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most important. The 37 variables were ranked by the sum of the responses. The median rating and interquartile range as well as the mean for each factor was then calculated. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare medians in rank order. Results A total of 137 completed questionnaires were returned, yielding a 61% response rate. The characteristics candidates considered most important were impressions during the interview, experiences during away rotations, importance placed on resident training/support/mentoring by faculty, personal experiences with residents, and the amount of time spent in general surgery. The characteristics candidates considered least important were second-look experiences, compensation/benefits, program reputation from Internet forums, accessibility of program coordinator, opportunity for laboratory research, and fellowship positions available at the program. Conclusions Applicants value personal contact and time spent in general surgery when selecting residency programs. As the number of integrated programs continues to grow, programs will benefit from learning what factors their applicants value most.

AB - Purpose The National Residency Matching Program Match is a very unique process in which applicants and programs are coupled to each other based on a ranking system. Although several studies have assessed features plastic surgery programs look for in applicants, no study in the present plastic surgery literature identifies which residency characteristics are most important to plastic surgery applicants. Therefore, we sought to perform a multi-institutional assessment as to which factors plastic surgery residency applicants consider most important when applying for residency. Methods A validated and anonymous questionnaire containing 37 items regarding various program characteristics was e-mailed to 226 applicants to New York University, Albany, University of Michigan, and University of Southern California plastic surgery residency programs. Applicants were asked to rate each feature on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 being the most important. The 37 variables were ranked by the sum of the responses. The median rating and interquartile range as well as the mean for each factor was then calculated. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare medians in rank order. Results A total of 137 completed questionnaires were returned, yielding a 61% response rate. The characteristics candidates considered most important were impressions during the interview, experiences during away rotations, importance placed on resident training/support/mentoring by faculty, personal experiences with residents, and the amount of time spent in general surgery. The characteristics candidates considered least important were second-look experiences, compensation/benefits, program reputation from Internet forums, accessibility of program coordinator, opportunity for laboratory research, and fellowship positions available at the program. Conclusions Applicants value personal contact and time spent in general surgery when selecting residency programs. As the number of integrated programs continues to grow, programs will benefit from learning what factors their applicants value most.

KW - applicant

KW - application

KW - away rotation

KW - integrated residency

KW - interview

KW - match

KW - match process

KW - match program

KW - medical school

KW - plastic surgery

KW - questionnaire

KW - residency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929887861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929887861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000511

DO - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000511

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 713

EP - 717

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

IS - 6

ER -