Research funding: The case for a modified lottery

Ferric C. Fang, Arturo Casadevall

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

The time-honored mechanism of allocating funds based on ranking of proposals by scientific peer review is no longer effective, because review panels cannot accurately stratify proposals to identify the most meritorious ones. Bias has a major influence on funding decisions, and the impact of reviewer bias is magnified by low funding paylines. Despite more than a decade of funding crisis, there has been no fundamental reform in the mechanism for funding research. This essay explores the idea of awarding research funds on the basis of a modified lottery in which peer review is used to identify the most meritorious proposals, from which funded applications are selected by lottery. We suggest that a modified lottery for research fund allocation would have many advantages over the current system, including reducing bias and improving grantee diversity with regard to seniority, race, and gender.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere00422-16
JournalmBio
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 12 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Virology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Research funding: The case for a modified lottery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this