TY - JOUR
T1 - Research and informed consent in africa — another look
AU - Ijsselmuiden, Carel B.
AU - Faden, Ruth R.
PY - 1992/3/19
Y1 - 1992/3/19
N2 - The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi “scientists” — an extreme instance of ignoring the value of individual human beings allegedly in the pursuit of knowledge.1 2 3 Similar but less dramatic disrespect for the subjects of medical research was common just after the Second World War and reflected the paternalistic atmosphere that pervaded medical practice at that time.1,4 More recent examples of unethical research, which stimulated the development of the current theory.
AB - The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi “scientists” — an extreme instance of ignoring the value of individual human beings allegedly in the pursuit of knowledge.1 2 3 Similar but less dramatic disrespect for the subjects of medical research was common just after the Second World War and reflected the paternalistic atmosphere that pervaded medical practice at that time.1,4 More recent examples of unethical research, which stimulated the development of the current theory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026538303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026538303&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM199203193261212
DO - 10.1056/NEJM199203193261212
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 1538731
AN - SCOPUS:0026538303
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 326
SP - 830
EP - 834
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 12
ER -